Comparison of Different Methods for Determination of Modulus of Elasticity of Composite Reinforcement Produced from Roving

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently, high performance concrete (HPC) is becoming more and more popular mainly because of its great mechanical parameters. As in the case of ordinary power concrete (OPC) it is necessary to improve the load bearing capacity with using of reinforcement. The present age calls for using of very thin structures for reasons of both environmental parameters and visual quality. Based on this fact, reinforcement start to use durable composite materials, such as technical textiles made of them. Element of HPC with this type of reinforcement is called textile reinforced high performance concrete (TRHPC). It is impossible to use the traditional approach for usually used steel reinforcement if we want to design these extra-thin structures. Modeled structures are very sensitive for input parameters and the development of standards for TRC material lags. The present study is focused on the different method of approach for the determination of tensile modulus of composite reinforcement. Three used methods are compared with each other using numerical analysis of four point bending test of façade element for one type of used reinforcement. Curves from numerical analysis are finally compared with the curve from real experiment and based on this the final evaluation is generated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

104-109

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. Brameshuber (Ed. ), Textile reinforced concrete, State-of-the-Art Report of RILEM Technical Committee 201-TRC, RILEM Publ. S.A.R.L., Bagneux, France, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Contamine, A. Si Larbi, P. Hamelin, Contribution to direct tensile testing of textile reinforced concrete (TRC) composites, Materials Science and Engineering A 528 (2011) 8589-8598.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.009

Google Scholar

[3] W. Graf, A. Hoffmann, B. Möller, J. Sickert, F. Steinigen, Analysis of textile-reinforced concrete structures under consideration of non-traditional uncertainty models, Engineering Structures 29 (2007) 3420-3431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.013

Google Scholar

[4] S. Gopinath, V. Ramesh Kumar, H. Sheth, A. Ramachandra Murthy, NR. Iyer, Pre-fabricated sandwich panels using cold-formed steel and textile reinforced concrete, Construction and Building Materials 64 (2014) 54-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.068

Google Scholar

[5] S. Holler, C. Butenweg, S. Noh, K. Meskouris, Computational model of textile-reinforced concrete structures, Computers and Structures 82 (2004) 1971-(1979).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.076

Google Scholar

[6] J. Hegger, S. Voss, Investigations on the bearing behaviour and application potential of textile reinforced concrete, Engineering Structures 30 (2008) 2050-(2056).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.006

Google Scholar

[7] Cem-FIL® 5325, Product Data Sheet, http: /www. ocvreinforcements. com/uploadedFiles/ Reinforcement/CemFil/Doc/10010692-D_CemFil_5325_ww_12_2010_Rev7_EN_A4. pdf.

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /www. solutions-in-textile. com/114_sitgrid. html.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Vlach, M. Novotná, C. Fiala, L. Laiblová, P. Hájek, Cohesion of composite reinforcement produced from rovings with high performance concrete, Proceeding Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Switzerland, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.732.397

Google Scholar

[10] Sikafloor® - 156, Product Data Sheet, http: /cze. sika. com/dms/getdocument. get/24bcfb62-e97c-3809-bd0c-84260131775e/Sikafloor-156. pdf.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Kynclova, Environmentally effective waffle floor structures from fibre concrete, Proceedings of the 8th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] ACI 440. 3R-03, Guide Test Methods for Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) for Reinforcing or Strengthening of Concrete Structures, ACI Committee 440, (2012).

Google Scholar

[13] Reiterman, P., Jogl, M., Baumelt, V., Seifrt, J., 2014, Development and mix design of HPC and UHPFRC, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 982, pp.130-135.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.982.130

Google Scholar

[14] ACI 440. 3R-03, Guide Test Methods for Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) for Reinforcing or Strengthening of Concrete Structures, ACI Committee 440, (2012).

Google Scholar

[15] T. Vlach, Cohesion of Carbon and Basalt Composite Reinforcement with UHPC, 16th International Conference of PhD Students Juniorstav, Brno University of Technology, Brno, (2014).

Google Scholar

[16] L. Laiblová, Textile reinforcement for elements from high performance concrete - experimental verification and evaluation, CTU in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Building Structures, supervisor P. Hájek, diploma thesis (Ing. ), Prague (2014).

Google Scholar

[17] CSN EN 12390-5: Zkoušení ztvrdlého betonu – Část 5: Pevnost v tahu ohybem zkušebních těles. Vydavatelství ÚNM. Praha. (2009).

Google Scholar

[18] Information on http: /www. cervenka. cz/products/atena.

Google Scholar

[19] J. Vorel, J. Zeman, M. Šejnoha, Homogenization of plain weave composites with imperfect microstructure, part II. analysis of real-world materials, Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering 11 (5) (2013) 443-462.

DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.2013004866

Google Scholar

[20] J. Vorel, E. Grippon, M. Šejnoha, Effective thermoelastic properties of polysiloxane matrix based plain weave textile composites, Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering.

DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.2014011020

Google Scholar