CO2 Abatement Allocation among Different Provinces of China Based on MACC

Hai Lin Mu; Xiao Han; Han Xin Zhao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.675-677.1869

Paper Titles

The Organization of SMEs Innovation Research Based on Circular Economy
p.1846

Technological Innovation in the Development of Agricultural Eco-Economy in China
p.1851

Analysis of Carbon Emission Structure of Agricultural Ecosystem - A Case Study of Rural Areas Surrounding Yuqiao Reservoir in Ji County of Tianjin, China
p.1859

Analysis of Hubei Province Industry’s Carbon Emissions Based on the LMDI
p.1865

CO₂ Abatement Allocation among Different Provinces of China Based on MACC
p.1869

Research on the Influence of Carbon Trading on Jibei Grid Considering the Co-Ordination of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province
p.1875

Specific Electrical Energy Consumption and CO₂ Emissions Assessment of Agrifood Industries in the Central Region of Portugal
p.1880

Study on Evaluation Method of Carbon Reduction Capability in Real Estate Development Projects Based on AFSA
p.1887

The Changing of Climate Determined by Silicon
p.1893

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 675-677CO2 Abatement Allocation among Different Provinces...

CO₂ Abatement Allocation among Different Provinces of China Based on MACC

Abstract:

Based on Nordhaus’ classic marginal abatement cost form, and the marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) for China calculated by EPPA model, this paper obtains the optimal CO₂ abatement allocation among different provinces in China with a minimum total abatement cost. In order to verify the effectiveness of the allocation scheme, we also consider the allocation program of carbon dioxide emissions reduction in population, GDP, and energy consumption, and the result shows that the optimal allocation we propose is the most cost-effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Environmental Technology and Resource Utilization II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 675-677)

Pages:

1869-1874

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.675-677.1869

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Hai Lin Mu, Xiao Han*, Han Xin Zhao

Keywords:

Abatement Allocation, Carbon Intensity, CO₂ Emission, MACC

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Ellerman, D.A., Decaux, A. Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 Emission Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves [C]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 40, (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] Deng JL. Grey system fundamental method. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, China, (1982).

Google Scholar

[3] IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [M]. (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] NORDHAUS W D. The Cost of Slowing Climate Change: A Survey [J]. Energy Journal. 1991, 12: 37-65.

Google Scholar

[5] Empirical Study for CO2 Abatement Allocation among Provinces in China: Based on a Nonlinear Programming Model [J]. Management Review, 2010, 22(6): 54-60.

Google Scholar

[6] China N B o S o. China Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2002-(2013).

Google Scholar

[7] China N B o S o. China Energy Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2002-(2013).

Google Scholar

[8] JENNIFER M, SERGEY p , JOHN R. Marginal Abatement Cost and Marginal Welfare Costs for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: Results from the EPPA Model [J]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change , Report 164 , (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s10666-011-9298-7

Google Scholar