Paper Titles

FrFT Angle Division Multiple Access with Optimal Time-Frequency-Angle Resource Distribution
p.1012

Efficient LLR Optimization Based on GMI for LDPC Coded BICM Systems
p.1016

A Novel Approach for PAPR Reduction of NC-OFDM System
p.1021

Covariance-Based Wavefield Separation and its Application in Crosswell Seismic Data
p.1027

A Novel Decoupled LOS Rate Estimator for Terminal Guidance
p.1032

Coarse-To-Fine 3D Randomized Hough Transform for Dim Target Detection
p.1040

Simulation on the Track Integration of Radar System and ADS-B
p.1046

Blind Complex Source Separation Based on Cyclostationary Statistics
p.1051

Wavelet De-Noising Method Based on a New Kind of Threshold Function
p.1057

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 519-520A Novel Decoupled LOS Rate Estimator for Terminal...

A Novel Decoupled LOS Rate Estimator for Terminal Guidance

Article Preview

Abstract:

An novel decoupled estimation algorithm based on kalman filter is presented to solve the line-of-sight (LOS) rate estimation problem in terminal guidance of air-to-air combat. The measurements of target azimuth and elevation are obtained by missile-borne active radar seeker which use a monopulse doppler radar. As it cant be directly measured by this kind of radar, the LOS rate which is needed as the input of guidance law should be estimated from these angle measurements. The close-loop simulation of LOS rate estimation in typical terminal guidance scenario that an air-to-air missile seeks a military fighter validates the presented algorithm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Computer and Information Technology

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 519-520)

Pages:

1032-1039

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.519-520.1032

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Qing Lin Zhai, Da Wei Lu, Jun Zhang

Keywords:

Close-Loop Simulation, Decoupled Channel, Kalman Filter, LOS Rate Estimation, Monopulse Radar, Terminal Guidance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] T. Srinivasan, P. K. Kar, A. K. Sarkar, and M. R. Ananthasayanam. Performance Study of Radar and Seeker Estimation in a Realistic Tactical Scenario [P]. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2008, p.1–21.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-7462

[2] M. R. Ananthasayanam, A. K. Sarkar, P. Vohra, A. Bhattacharya, and R. Srivastava. Estimation of LOS Rates and Angles Using EKF from Noisy Seeker Measurements [P]. International Conference on Signal Processing & Communicatons, 2004. p.1–5.

DOI: 10.1109/spcom.2004.1458515

[3] Dowdle J R, Athans M, Gully S, Willasky A S. An Optimal Control and Estimation Algorithm For Missile Endgame Guidance [P], Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decission and Control, (1982).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1982.268329

[4] Kim Y, Seo J H. The Realization of the Three Dimensional Guidance Law Using Augmunted Proportional Navigation[P], Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decission and Control. December (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1996.573514

[5] J. Waldmann, Line-of-Sight Rate Estimation and Linearizing Control of an Imaging Seeker in a Tactical Missile Guided by Proportional Navigation [J], IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, p.556–567, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2002.1014675

[6] B. Ekstrand, Tracking Filters and Models for Seeker Applications [J], IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 37, No. 3, p.965–977, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/7.953250

[7] J. H. Blakelock, Automatic Control of Aircraft and Missile: Second Edition [M]. New York: A Wiley-Interscience publication, (1991).

[8] G. M. Siouris. Missile Guidance and Control Systems [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., (2004).

[9] Merrill I. Skolnik. Radar Handbook, Second Edition [M]. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (1980).

[10] George W. Stimson. Introduction to Airborne Radar Second Edition [M]. SciTech Pulishing Inc., (1998).

[11] Y. -P. Lin, C. -L. Lin, and Y. -H. Li, Development of 3-D Modified Proportional Navigation Guidance Law against High-Speed Targets [J], IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 1, p.677–687, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/taes.2013.6404133

[12] M. R. Ananthasayanam, A. K. Sarkar, A. Bhattacharya, P. K. Tiwari, and P. Vohra, Nonlinear Observer State Estimation From Seeker Measurements and Seeker-Radar Measurements Fusion [P]. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California, 2005, p.1.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-6066

[13] H. R. Zhou, K. S. P. Kumar. A"Current"Statistical Model and Adaptive Algorithm for Estimating Maneuvering Targets[J]. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Vol. 7, No. 5, p.596–602, (1984).

DOI: 10.2514/3.19900

[14] X. R. Li, V. P. Jilkov. Survey of Maneuvering Target Tracking. Part I: Dynamic Models [J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 39, No. 4, p.1333–1364, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/taes.2003.1261132

[15] W. -S. Ra, I. -H. Whang, and J. -Y. Ahn. Robust Horizontal line-of-sight rate estimator for sea skimming anti-ship missile with two-axis gimballed seeker [J]. IEE Proc. -Radar Sonar Navi., Vol. 152, No. 1, p.9–15, (2005).

DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20041177