Comparison of Evaluation Based on Different Atmospheric Correction Methods for HJ-1A Hyperspectral Imaging Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

HJ-1 Hyperspectral image radiometer is on the HJ-1A satellite. It will provide images about 115 spectral bands between 0.45 and 0.95μm, with spatial resolution of 100 meters and give a return visit every 96 hours. Atmospheric correction models of 6S and FLAASH were applied to the image. The results showed that both models could carry out the radiation correction to radiation-induced distortion caused by atmospheric effects, but correction results were different. 6S had well results comparing to the in-situ spectrum of vegetation. The image quality was better which had the further application ability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

224-229

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Nie Aixiu, Zhang Liting and Chen Zhuan. A Practical atmospheric correction method and its applications in the hyperion image. Journal of East China institute of Technology(Natural Science Edition), vol. 30, 2007, pp.751-1061.

Google Scholar

[2] Sun Lin, Liu Qinhuo, Chen Liangfu. The Application of HJ-1 Hyperspectral Imaging Radiometer to Retrieve Aerosol Optical Thickness over Land. Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 10, 2006, pp.770-776.

Google Scholar

[3] Li Guojian, Zhang Zhongyuan, Zheng Yanfen. Atmospheric correction of MODIS and its application in cyanobacteria bloom monitoring in Lake Taihu. Journal of Lake science, vol. 20, No. 2, 2008, pp.160-166.

DOI: 10.18307/2008.0204

Google Scholar

[4] Song Xiaoyu, Wang Jihua, Liu Liangyun, et al. Atmospheric Correction of Hyper- spectral Imagery: Evaluation of the FLAASH Algorithm with AVRIS Data. Remote sensing technology and application, vol. 20, 2005, pp.493-893.

Google Scholar

[5] Luo Cailian, Chen Jie, Le Tongchao. Atmospheric Correction on Landsat ETM+ Satellite Image Based on FLAASH Model. protection Forest Science and Technology, vol. 5, 2008, pp.64-84.

Google Scholar

[6] Didier Tanre, Jean Luc Deuze, Maurice Herman, et al. Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6s: An Overview. Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing. vol. 35, no. 3, 1997, pp.675-686.

DOI: 10.1109/36.581987

Google Scholar

[7] Wang Zhao. Analysis of 6S radiation model algorithm and its applications in the atmospheric correction of MODIS. Shanxi Meteorology, vol. 5, 2006, pp.43-73.

Google Scholar

[8] GHULAMAbduWasit, Qin Qiming, Zhu Lijiang. 6S Model Based Atmospheric Correction of Visibleand Near-Infrared Data and Sensitivity Analysis. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universities pekinensis, vol. 40, no. 4, 2004, pp.116-816.

Google Scholar

[9] Zheng Wei, Zeng Zhiyuan. A Review on Methods of Atmospheric Correction for Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing Information, 2004, pp.66-96.

Google Scholar

[10] Xu Meng, Yu Fan, Li Yachun, et al., The Method of Atmospheric Correction on the EOS/ MODIS Data with 6S Model. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Sciences), vol. 42, 2006, pp.285-985.

Google Scholar

488-0. 490.

Google Scholar

1637 b33.

Google Scholar

537-0. 539.

Google Scholar

1319 b40.

Google Scholar

557-0. 560.

Google Scholar

1220 b46.

Google Scholar

576-0. 580.

Google Scholar

1140 b67.

Google Scholar

654-0. 658.

Google Scholar

0881 b86.

Google Scholar

745-0. 751.

Google Scholar

0679 b89.

Google Scholar

762-0. 768.

Google Scholar

0648 b92.

Google Scholar

780-0. 786.

Google Scholar

0619 b99.

Google Scholar

824-0. 831.

Google Scholar

0217 (1-a) (1-b) (1-c) (1-d) Fig. 1 Comparison among in-situ spectrum, radiance and atmospheric correction (2-a) Histogram of radiance (2-b) Histogram of 6S correction (2-c) Histogram of FLAASH correction Fig. 2 Comparison of histogram before and after atmospheric correction.

DOI: 10.17816/dd70479-40209

Google Scholar