Reference Hub15
Time, Attitude, and User Participation: How Prior Events Determine User Attitudes in ERP Implementation

Time, Attitude, and User Participation: How Prior Events Determine User Attitudes in ERP Implementation

Lene Pries-Heje
Copyright: © 2008 |Volume: 4 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 18
ISSN: 1548-1115|EISSN: 1548-1123|ISSN: 1548-1115|EISBN13: 9781615202720|EISSN: 1548-1123|DOI: 10.4018/jeis.2008070104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Pries-Heje, Lene. "Time, Attitude, and User Participation: How Prior Events Determine User Attitudes in ERP Implementation." IJEIS vol.4, no.3 2008: pp.48-65. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2008070104

APA

Pries-Heje, L. (2008). Time, Attitude, and User Participation: How Prior Events Determine User Attitudes in ERP Implementation. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 4(3), 48-65. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2008070104

Chicago

Pries-Heje, Lene. "Time, Attitude, and User Participation: How Prior Events Determine User Attitudes in ERP Implementation," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS) 4, no.3: 48-65. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2008070104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Assimilation of a standard ERP system to an organization is difficult. User involvement seems to be the crux of the matter. However, even the best intentions for user involvement may come to nothing. A case study of a five-year ERP implementation process reveals that a main reason may be that the perception of usefulness of the system in any given phase of the implementation is heavily dependent on preceding events—the process. A process model analysis identifies eight episodes and nine encounters in the case showing that the user’s attitude towards the ERP system changes between acceptance, equivocation, resistance and rejection depending on three things: (1) the dynamic between user and consultants, (2) the dynamic between different user groups, and (3) the understanding of technical, organizational and socio-technical options. When relating the empirical findings to existing theory on user participation, it is argued that the changes could be explained as a slide from influential user participation toward pseudo participation and back to influential participation, and that user participation in the context of ERP implementations raises new issues regarding user participation. Thus further research regarding new approaches and/or new techniques and tools for user participation in the context of ERP implementations is needed.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.