Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub2
Exploring Student Engagement With Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on L2 Writing

Exploring Student Engagement With Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on L2 Writing

Maggie Ma
Copyright: © 2022 |Volume: 12 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 19
ISSN: 2155-7098|EISSN: 2155-7101|EISBN13: 9781683182337|DOI: 10.4018/IJCALLT.305828
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Ma, Maggie. "Exploring Student Engagement With Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on L2 Writing." IJCALLT vol.12, no.2 2022: pp.1-19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.305828

APA

Ma, M. (2022). Exploring Student Engagement With Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on L2 Writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 12(2), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.305828

Chicago

Ma, Maggie. "Exploring Student Engagement With Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on L2 Writing," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) 12, no.2: 1-19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.305828

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

From a sociocultural perspective, this case study explored two intermediate-level Chinese university EFL students’ multi-dimensional engagement with asynchronous computer-mediated mode of peer feedback. Data sources included student drafts, peer feedback, think-aloud protocols, stimulated recall, and semi-structured interviews. The two students displayed different responses to asynchronous computer-mediated peer feedback with different foci when engaging with it affectively, cognitively, and behaviorally. In particular, their cognitive engagement was characterized by noticing and interpretation, evaluation, and decision-making. The two student writers’ engagement was not just related to the computer-mediated mode of peer feedback, but also to their motives and roles adopted in the activity of engaging with peer feedback, both of which may be influenced by the community (i.e., the classroom instructional context), its rule (i.e., word limit), and the division of labour in the community (i.e., the role adopted by student reviewer). Pedagogical implications are discussed.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.