Reference Hub1
Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing

Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing

Xiang Ren
ISBN13: 9781466688568|ISBN10: 1466688564|EISBN13: 9781466688575
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.ch013
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Ren, Xiang. "Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing." Open Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education: Curriculum Models and Institutional Policies, edited by Shirley Reushle, et al., IGI Global, 2016, pp. 245-262. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.ch013

APA

Ren, X. (2016). Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing. In S. Reushle, A. Antonio, & M. Keppell (Eds.), Open Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education: Curriculum Models and Institutional Policies (pp. 245-262). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.ch013

Chicago

Ren, Xiang. "Quality Assessment and Certification in Open Scholarly Publishing and Inspiration for MOOC Credentialing." In Open Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education: Curriculum Models and Institutional Policies, edited by Shirley Reushle, Amy Antonio, and Mike Keppell, 245-262. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8856-8.ch013

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter looks at the changing landscape of quality assessment and certification/credentialing in open knowledge systems by a comparative study between open publishing and open education. Despite the disruptive changes driven by open publishing in scholarly communication, it is challenging to develop widely accepted methods for quality assessment and certification. Similar challenges exist in open education platforms like the massive open online course (MOOC). This work reviews four types of innovations in open publishing in terms of quality control, namely “light touch” peer review, post-publication assessment, social peer review, and open peer review. Synthesising the principles and strategies of these innovations, it discusses how they might be inspiring for developing solutions and models for MOOC assessment and credentialing. This chapter concludes by suggesting future research directions. It argues that the open initiatives are co-evolving with the “traditional” systems and integrating with the established models.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.