pISSN 1738-6586   eISSN 2005-5013
Open Access, Peer-reviewed
    J Clin Neurol. 2018 Apr;14(2):141-152. English.
    Published online Jan 10, 2018.
    https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2018.14.2.141
    Copyright © 2018 Korean Neurological Association
    Review

    The Influence of Sex in Stroke Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Mingsu Liu, Guangqin Li, Jie Tang, Yan Liao, Lin Li, Yang Zheng, Tongli Guo, Xin Kang and Maoting Yuan
      • Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
    • Correspondence: Guangqin Li, MD. Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No 1, Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China. Tel +86 13608311389, Fax +86 89012106, Email: liguangqin@tom.com
    Received May 11, 2017; Revised August 05, 2017; Accepted August 08, 2017.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose

    There is increasing recognition of the importance of stroke in females to both clinical and public health. The natural course of stroke is worse in females than in males, but the evidence regarding sex disparities in the responses to thrombolysis in stroke patents is still controversial. We compared outcomes after thrombolysis treatment between females and males.

    Methods

    Clinical trials reported in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases up to March 13, 2017 were included in this analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and conducted quality assessments. Statistical tests were performed to check for heterogeneity and publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to evaluate the stability of the conclusions.

    Results

    Sixteen reports involving 60,159 patients were available for analysis. The female patients were a 0.89-fold [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87–0.90, p<0.001], 0.89-fold (95% CI=0.87–0.91, p<0.001), and 1.24-fold (95% CI=1.11–1.36, p<0.001) more likely to obtain good, excellent, and poor functional outcomes, respectively, with no significant difference in the complications of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage among the sexes [risk ratios (RR)=0.99, 95% CI=0.92–1.07, p=0.81] after thrombolysis treatment. In addition, the prevalence of a good functional outcome did not differ significantly between females and males in the intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) group (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.85–1.29, p=0.67) in a subgroup analysis.

    Conclusions

    This study has demonstrated that females often exhibit a worse outcome than males after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), whereas no relevant sex differences were found in outcome or recanalization after IAT, with safety regarding hemorrhage complications from thrombolysis being the same for the sexes. However, IVT should not be withheld from female stroke patients solely based on their sex before the findings are confirmed in further large-scale research.

    Keywords
    sex; stroke; thrombolysis; meta-analysis

    INTRODUCTION

    In recent years there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of stroke in females to both clinical and public health.1, 2 Females have a higher stroke incidence due to their higher life expectancy, since the stroke rate increases dramatically with age.1, 3, 4 Women receive a lower quality of care5 and less frequent use of medication-based guidelines,6, 7 and they are also less likely to receive thrombolysis than men.8, 9, 10, 11 These sex-related differences might be due to females being, older at onset, having a higher severity of the neurological state, atypical syndromes, delayed time from symptom onset to hospital or from door to needle, greater likelyhood of living alone, or being more unwilling to accept thrombolysis.12, 13, 14 Many population-based and multicenter studies have shown that women have a longer stroke-related course, worse functional outcome, lower likelihood of being discharged to home, and a lower quality of life than men during the natural course of stroke.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 However, a post-hoc analysis of five pooled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggested women can benefit more than men from recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) thrombolysis and exhibit a similar outcome to men after thrombolysis independently of other variables.21 A similar conclusion was reached based on post-hoc analysises of the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study22 database, Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Register23 study on intravenous t-PA and Prolyse for Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism-224 study on intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT), and some other studies,25, 26, 27, 28, 29 which included an unadjusted partial meta-analysis that appeared to indicate thrombolysis could nullify or reverse the usual sex effect. In contrast to these findings, there are other reports of worse 3-month functional outcomes in females after thrombolysis, as has also been found for the natural course of stroke.28, 29 Buijs et al.30 reported that women and men exhibit different prognoses after thrombolysis, with older women appearing to have a worse outcome than men after recombinant t-PA treatment. In contrast, while a recent large cohort study31 also found that a poor functional outcome was more common in women than in men, this difference was not dependent on age.

    It therefore remains unclear whether thrombolysis has the potential to eliminate the sex difference in the functional outcome poststroke. In addition, primary randomization is obviously not possible given that sex is a nature-determined factor, and no previous post-hoc-analysis-based or cohort-based meta-analysis has compared outcomes between female and male stroke patients after they received thrombolysis. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether sex is a predictor of outcomes in stroke patients after thrombolysis in order to provide useful clinical information for choosing of therapeutic strategies and determining the prognosis following stroke.

    METHODS

    Search strategy

    We performed a computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies up to March 13, 2017 using the following terms: (‘gender’ OR ‘sex’ OR ‘women’ OR ‘men’ OR ‘male’ OR ‘female’) AND (‘thrombolysis’ OR ‘tissue plasminogen activator’). We read the title and abstract of reports that met our search strategy, followed by the full text if the research was identified as being either relevant or unclear. We also reviewed reference lists and citations from these studies to seek additional eligible research. All of the identified references were managed using EndNote.

    Outcomes and definitions

    The functional outcome at 3 months was categorized using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) into good (mRS score=0–2), excellent (mRS score=0 or 1), or poor (mRS score=3–6). Recanalization was defined when patients with any thrombolysis had a thrombolysis assessed as myocardial ischemic grades 2 or 3 in computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was defined according to the criteria used in the original studies.

    Eligibility and exclusion criteria

    Eligible articles described post-hoc analyses of RCTs or original observational cohort studies that investigated the influence of sex difference in the response to thrombolysis in stroke. Included studies were required to have available data on the functional outcome at 3 months. The following exclusion criteria were applied: 1) editorial, case report, systematic review, meta-analysis, pooled analysis, non-original study; 2) retrospective case-control study; or 3) inability to extract relevant data.

    Data extraction and quality assessment

    Data were independently extracted by two of the authors (Liu and Li) using a standardized criteria with any disagreement resolved by consensus. The extracted data consisted of the study title, year, country, study period, study design, sample size, subject ages, baseline stroke severity, time to treatment, differences in baseline, and main outcome variables. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) with NOS scores of ≥6 points considered to indicate high quality and those of 5 or 6 points considered to indicate moderate quality.

    Statistical analysis

    Risk ratios (RRs) and related statistics were calculated using Stata (version 12, https://www.stata.com). We calculated RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) either from the total number of events or from the number of events for each outcome when RR was not directly available in original studies. We then pooled the summary effect based on RRs and 95% CIs of outcomes using a fixed-effects models, with p<0.05 regarded as indicative of statistical significance. The chi-squared (χ2) and I-squared (I2) tests were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity, with a probability value of p<0.05 indicating that significant heterogeneity existed and that I2 values of 25, 50, and 75% indicating low, moderate, and high levels of heterogeneity respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the possible sources of between-study variations. A-priori subgroup analysis was applied to 1) location (Europe, North America, or other), 2) study design (single-center hospital or multiple center hospital; post-hoc analyses of RCTs or original observational cohorts), and 3) subgroup of the method of thrombolysis (intravenous or intra-arterial). A sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the analysis model to random-effects model, sequentially removing individual studies. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and a funnel plot if the number of included studies was sufficient.

    RESULTS

    Search results and study characteristics

    Overall, 1,685 studies were identified and screened for retrieval from the analyzed databases. Careful selection based on the criteria described above identified the following 16 reports involving 60,159 patients as being suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis: Spaander et al.,31 Buijs et al.,30 Hametner et al.,32 Al-hussain et al.,33 Lasek-Bal et al.,34 Nathanson et al.,35 Lorenzano et al.,23 Martinez-Sanchez et al.,29 Forster et al.,25 Jovanovic et al.,36 Meseguer et al.,26 Kent et al.,22 Gomez-Choco et al.,37 Arnold et al.,27 Elkind et al.,28 Hill et al.24 The flowchart for these studies is shown in Fig. 1.

    Fig. 1
    Trial selection process.

    Three of the included researches22, 24, 28 were post-hoc analyses of RCTs and the other 13 were observational cohort studies. The patients were from Europe in 12 studies, North America in 3 studies,22, 24, 28 and Saudi Arabia in 1 studies.33 The definition of sICH differed slightly with two studies22, 35 defining it as a hemorrhage that was not seen on a previous CT scan, with a subsequently been a decline in neurological functional status as defined in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke trial,38 five studies23, 26, 31, 32, 36 defining it as an intracranial hemorrhage on a CT scan with a decrease in the score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of at least 4 or more points as applied by the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study trial,39 and one studies37 was defining it in accordance with the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke trials.40 sICH was not defined in the reports for the remaining studies.25, 27, 33, 34 The detailed individual characteristics of the studies are tabulated in Table 1, while particularly interesting outcomes obtained in the meta-analysis are listed in Table 2.

    Table 1
    Characteristics of clinical trials included in the meta-analysis

    Table 2
    Various outcomes in the clinical trials

    The NOS score was 9 points for two studies, 8 points for ten studies, 7 points for two studies, and 6 points for two studies (Table 3). According to the criteria described above, all of the cohort studies were of high quality, which indicated that all of the included studies were reliable.

    Table 3
    Quality assessment of included studies using the NOS

    Good functional outcome at 3 months

    Statistical analysis was applied to 11 studies for which the reported good functional outcome was good (mRS score=0–2) at 3 months. The meta-analysis revealed that the probability of a good functional outcome after administering intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) was significantly lower among female patients than male patients (RR=0.89, 95% CI=0.87–0.90, p<0.001) (Fig. 2). A moderate heterogeneity was found (p=0.02, I2=54.50%) at the 5% level, but the sources of heterogeneity were not revealed by subgroup analyses of the location, study design or method of thrombolysis. The result for the IAT group was of not significant (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.85–1.29, p=0.67) (Fig. 3), while the IVT group still showed a statistically significant difference in the subgroup analysis of the method of thrombolysis.

    Fig. 2
    Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values for exhibiting good functional outcomes in females versus males with stroke who received thrombolysis; fixed-effects model.

    Fig. 3
    Subgroup analysis of the method of thrombolysis for the likelihood of exhibiting a good functional outcomes in females versus males with stroke who received thrombolysis. CI: confidence interval, IAT: intra-arterial thrombolysis, IVT: intravenous thrombolysis, RR: relative risk.

    The sensitivity analysis was performed in three aspects: 1) changing the analysis model to a random-effects model, which also producted similar results (RR=0.89, 95% CI=0.84–0.94, p<0.001), 2) sequentially removing individual studies, which produced minor changes in the results only for the study of Lorenzano et al.23 (Supplementary Fig. 1 in the onlineonly Data Supplement); however, the significant difference in the combined RR and CI was still present after removing the that study (RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.83–0.89, p<0.001), which indicated that the conclusion were reliable; and 3) removing studies with small samples,24, 34, 36 which also produced similar results (RR=0.89, 95% CI=0.87–0.90, p<0.001).

    Excellent functional outcome at 3 months

    The functional outcome at 3 months was excellent in 10 studies. The combined RR was calculated to be 0.89 (95% CI=0.86–0.91, p<0.001) (Fig. 4), with the likelihood of an excellent functional outcome at 3 months after receiving thrombolysis being significantly lower in females than in males. No significant heterogeneity was found (p=0.31) and so a fixed-effects model was applied (Fig. 4). The sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the analysis model to a random-effects model, which produced the same results (RR=0.88, 95% CI= 0.84–0.92, p<0.001), while sequentially removing individual studies produced minor changes in the results again only for the study of Lorenzano et al.23 (Supplementary Fig. 2 in the online-only Data Supplement). However, the conclusions were consistent, because when removing that study there was still a significant difference in the combined RR and CI (RR=0.84, 95% CI=0.80–0.89, p<0.001).

    Fig. 4
    Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values for exhibiting an excellent functional outcome in females versus males with stroke who received thrombolysis; fixed-effects models.

    Poor functional outcome at 3 months

    On the basis of four studies, a poor functional outcome at 3 months was more likely in females than in males (RR=1.44, 95% CI=1.07–1.93, p<0.001) (Fig. 5). Moderate significant heterogeneity was found (p=0.02, I2=70.40%) and so a random-effects model was applied.

    Fig. 5
    Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values for exhibiting a poor functional outcome in females versus males with stroke who received thrombolysis; fixed-effects models.

    Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage

    The incidence of sICH was reported for 12 studies. The risk of sICH did not differ significantly between female and male stroke patients after thrombolysis treatment (RR=0.99, 95% CI=0.92–1.07, p=0.81) (Fig. 6). No significant heterogeneity was found (p=0.10) and so a fixed-effects model was applied.

    Fig. 6
    Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values for exhibiting a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization in females versus males with stroke who received thrombolysis; fixed-effects models.

    Recanalization

    Recanalization was reported for two IAT studies. There was no significant difference in the recanalization rate was demonstrated between female and male stroke patients who received IAT (RR=1.08, 95% CI=0.93–1.24, p=0.12) (Fig. 6). No significant heterogeneity was found (p=0.91, I2=0.00%) and so a fixed-effects model was applied.

    Publication bias evaluation

    Overall, no significant publication bias was detected by Egger's test (p=0.42) and Begger's test (p=0.76) for a good functional outcome or for an excellent functional outcome (p=0.59 and p=0.72, respectively). Moreover, there was no obvious asymmetry in the shape of the funnel plot on visual inspection respectively (Figs. 7 and 8). However, insufficient studies were available to test for funnel-plot asymmetry for the other outcomes.

    Fig. 7
    Funnel plot for a good functional outcome.

    Fig. 8
    Funnel plot for an excellent functional outcome.

    DISCUSSION

    It is widely accepted that stroke is a common cause of death and disability and that functional outcome is worse for females than males during the natural course of stroke. However, whether there is a sex disparity in the response to intravenous or IAT in AIS is still controversial. The present meta-nalysis based on 3 post-hoc analyses of RCTs and 13 cohort studies comparing the sex disparity in the functional outcomes of stroke patients who received pharmacological thrombolysis treatment produced the following main findings: 1) a good or excellent functional outcome was less likely and a poor functional outcome was more likely after IVT in females than in males, 2) the rates of a good functional outcome and recanalization after IAT did not differ between females and males, and 3) the rate of sICH did not differ between females and males after they received thrombolysis treatment.

    Our finding that females had poor functional outcomes more often than males after receiving thrombolysis is consistent with the findings of several other studies.28, 29, 30, 31 One possible explanation of is sex disparities in fibrinolytic factors. Kain et al.41, 42 reported that the level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) was significantly higher in females than in males with acute stroke, while Ribo et al.43 found PAI-1 to be an independent predictor of thrombolysis resistance. However, female experience more cardioembolic strokes, which are characterized by uniform fibrin-rich and smaller volume embolic clots and therefore a higher affinity for t-PA, making them prone to faster and more frequent recanalization compared with atherosclerotic strokes of the platelet-rich and larger volume occlusions that typically occur in males after IVT.1, 25, 44 Nevertheless, atrial fibrillation and cardioembolic strokes are associated with worse outcomes including severe neurological impairment and mortality.6, 15, 17 Thus, whether the advantage of recanalization based on thrombolysis in females can eliminate or reverse the poor outcome of the natural course of stroke is still uncertain. In addition, reperfusion (the goal of thrombolysis) is impacted not only by the recanalization status, but also by other factors such as collateralization and flow changes in communicating arteries.45 Recanalization is associated with good outcomes, but the time from symptom onset to recanalization is also a better predictor of a good clinical outcome.46, 47, 48, 49 However, female stroke patients usually experience delay in the time from symptom onset to hospital or from door to needle.12, 13, 14 To some extent all of these features support the findings of the present study.

    Another possible mechanism underlying the worse outcome after IVT in women could be the change in endogenous estrogen levels with increasing age. Animal studies have shown that estrogen is neuroprotective to the severity of ischemia and brain injury,50, 51 while human research has shown that applying estrogen replacement therapy sooner after menopause decreased the incidence of vascular events.52 These findings indicate that higher estrogen levels exert a neuroprotective effect. Estrogen can also alter the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis by lowering the level of platelet activator 1, which is a serine protease inhibitor that could decrease the efficacy of IVT. Shahar et al.53 found the levels of PAI-1 was lower in those receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and similarly Gebara et al.54 reported that premenopausal females with high estrogen levels and postmenopausal females receiving HRT had lower PAI-1 levels than males as well as postmenopausal female not receiving HRT. Therefore, the benefit from IVT in females will decline as their endogenous estrogen levels decrease with the increasing age. This is consistent with Buijs et al.30 finding that women have a better outcome in middle age after IVT but a worse outcome in old age. Furthermore, Spaander et al.31 showed that the turning point from a good functional outcome to a poor functional outcome occurred at around the age of 40 years although women had a worse functional outcome than men was independently of age. These mechanisms support our finding that females more often had worse outcomes than males after IVT, since the patients in all of the included studies were older and so estrogen had a lesser effect.

    The conclusions from previous studies of the relationship between sex differences and functional outcome after IVT were controversial. Our analysis reveals that this could be due to the following reasons. Firstly, several studies did not adjust for many baseline differences between females and males, such as age, stroke severity, time to treatment, stroke subtype, size and position of embolus, and comorbidities. Even though some researches adjusted for these baseline differences using conventional methods (restriction and multivariable regression) or even new methods (propensity score adjustment and the instrumental variable approach), the confounding factors were still not adequately controlled, leaving the possibility of residual confounding.55, 56, 57, 58 Secondly, the prestroke status, sociodemographics, living situation, family background poststroke care, and poststroke complications were not recorded or assessed in almost all previous studies, and these characteristics that could influence the functional outcome might differ between females and males. Lastly, the discrepancies in the conclusions might also attributable to differences in study designs and populations of interest and, in some cases, to the smallness of the included samples.23 Thus, a further studies with large-scale cohorts and that address the aforementioned imperfections are needed to confirm these findings.

    The present study found no significant difference in outcomes or recanalization after IAT between the two sexes. This is consistent with some previous studies,24, 27, 59 but it contrasts with the results for IVT in our study. It is well known that IVT is administered in a fixed-dose fashion while IAT is administered in a flexible-dose fashion, with infusion continuing until recanalization is achieved or a maximum dose is reached. The higher local concentrations of fibrinolytic agent achieved by IAT may overwhelm the hemostatic and thrombus volume differences and even modest differences between females and males, permitting equal recanalization rates and outcomes between the sexes. The other finding of no difference in sICH between females and males after IVT indicated that thrombolysis is equally safe in both sexes.

    As far as we are aware, this is the first meta-analysis to have systematically determined the relationship between outcomes after thrombolysis treatment and sex. Although the method of thrombolysis varied somewhat between the studies, this was not the source of interstudy heterogeneity. Our subgroup analysis produced different results for IVT and IAT. In addition, the large sample, sufficient observational outcomes (good, excellent, and poor functional outcomes, recanalization, and sICH) and absence of publication bias also represent considerable strengths of the present study.

    However, some limitations should also be mentioned before generalizing the present findings. Firstly, the included studies were observational studies, which are particularly prone to selection bias and confounding the real relationship between two sexes, various comparative cohort observational designs are now the most appropriate research methods for exploring whether sex is a predictor of outcome after thrombolysis. Secondly, the RR and CI values for some of the included studies were not adjusted for baseline characteristics, which might have resulted in confounding bias. This cannot be adjusted for in logistic regression analysis or multiple regression analysis due to the nonavailability of data for individual patients. Thirdly, heterogeneity was present between the studies. Although, we were unable to identify the sources of this heterogeneity in subgroup analysis, our conclusions were not changed when we performed sensitivity analysis. Fourthly, only 369 patients received IAT in the subgroup analysis of thrombolysis methods. The smallness of this samples means that caution is required when attempting to draw conclusions, and hence further studies with large-scale cohorts are needed to confirm our findings regarding IAT.

    CONCLUSION

    This study has demonstrated that females appear to often exhibit worse outcomes than males after IVT, while there are no relevant sex differences in outcomes and recanalization after IAT, with equivalently safety regarding hemorrhage complications from thrombolysis for both sexes. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution regarding whether females should receive additional therapy after IVT or change to thrombolytic treatment strategies (e.g. females receive IAT primarily after admission or dosing adjustment according to clot size in IVT). Thus, IVT should not be withheld from female stroke patients by physicians solely based on their sex before further large-scale cohorts research confirms the present findings.

    Supplementary Materials

    The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2018.14.2.141.

    Supplementary Fig. 1

    Sensitivity analysis of a good functional outcome by sequentially removing individual studies. CI: confidence interval.

    Click here to view.(16K, pdf)

    Supplementary Fig. 2

    Sensitivity analysis of an excellent functional outcome by sequentially removing individual studies. CI: confidence interval.

    Click here to view.(16K, pdf)

    Notes

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

    References

      1. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:915–926.
      1. Bushnell CD, Hurn P, Colton C, Miller VM, del Zoppo G, Elkind MS, et al. Advancing the study of stroke in women: summary and recommendations for future research from an NINDS-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Working Group. Stroke 2006;37:2387–2399.
      1. Petrea RE, Beiser AS, Seshadri S, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Wolf PA. Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study. Stroke 2009;40:1032–1037.
      1. Niewada M, Kobayashi A, Sandercock PA, Kamiński B, Członkowska A. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Influence of gender on baseline features and clinical outcomes among 17,370 patients with confirmed ischaemic stroke in the international stroke trial. Neuroepidemiology 2005;24:123–128.
      1. Reeves MJ, Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Schwamm LH. Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Steering Committee & Investigators. Quality of care in women with ischemic stroke in the GWTG program. Stroke 2009;40:1127–1133.
      1. Roquer J, Campello AR, Gomis M. Sex differences in first-ever acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34:1581–1585.
      1. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terént A, Hulter-Asberg K, Wester PO, et al. Sex differences in management and outcome after stroke: a Swedish national perspective. Stroke 2003;34:1970–1975.
      1. Reid JM, Dai D, Gubitz GJ, Kapral MK, Christian C, Phillips SJ. Gender differences in stroke examined in a 10-year cohort of patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. Stroke 2008;39:1090–1095.
      1. Reed SD, Cramer SC, Blough DK, Meyer K, Jarvik JG. Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator and inpatient mortality rates for patients with ischemic stroke treated in community hospitals. Stroke 2001;32:1832–1840.
      1. Deng YZ, Reeves MJ, Jacobs BS, Birbeck GL, Kothari RU, Hickenbottom SL, et al. IV tissue plasminogen activator use in acute stroke: experience from a statewide registry. Neurology 2006;66:306–312.
      1. Reeves M, Bhatt A, Jajou P, Brown M, Lisabeth L. Sex differences in the use of intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2009;40:1743–1749.
      1. Kapral MK, Devon J, Winter AL, Wang J, Peters A, Bondy SJ. Gender differences in stroke care decision-making. Med Care 2006;44:70–80.
      1. Turtzo LC, McCullough LD. Sex differences in stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:462–474.
      1. Gargano JW, Wehner S, Reeves MJ. Do presenting symptoms explain sex differences in emergency department delays among patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2009;40:1114–1120.
      1. Kapral MK, Fang J, Hill MD, Silver F, Richards J, Jaigobin C, et al. Sex differences in stroke care and outcomes: results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke 2005;36:809–814.
      1. Niewada M, Kobayashi A, Sandercock PA, Kamiński B, Członkowska A. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Influence of gender on baseline features and clinical outcomes among 17,370 patients with confirmed ischaemic stroke in the international stroke trial. Neuroepidemiology 2005;24:123–128.
      1. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Wolfe CD, et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke 2003;34:1114–1119.
      1. Bousser MG. Stroke in women: the 1997 Paul Dudley White International Lecture. Circulation 1999;99:463–467.
      1. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Kapral MK, Austin PC, Tu JV. Sex differences and similarities in the management and outcome of stroke patients. Stroke 2000;31:1833–1837.
      1. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, et al. Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2004;35:2340–2345.
      1. Kent DM, Price LL, Ringleb P, Hill MD, Selker HP. Sex-based differences in response to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke: a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stroke 2005;36:62–65.
      1. Kent DM, Buchan AM, Hill MD. The gender effect in stroke thrombolysis: of CASES, controls, and treatment-effect modification. Neurology 2008;71:1080–1083.
      1. Lorenzano S, Ahmed N, Falcou A, Mikulik R, Tatlisumak T, Roffe C, et al. Does sex influence the response to intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke?: answers from safe implementation of treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. Stroke 2013;44:3401–3406.
      1. Hill MD, Kent DM, Hinchey J, Rowley H, Buchan AM, Wechsler LR, et al. Sex-based differences in the effect of intra-arterial treatment of stroke: analysis of the PROACT-2 study. Stroke 2006;37:2322–2325.
      1. Förster A, Gass A, Kern R, Wolf ME, Ottomeyer C, Zohsel K, et al. Gender differences in acute ischemic stroke: etiology, stroke patterns and response to thrombolysis. Stroke 2009;40:2428–2432.
      1. Meseguer E, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Arnaiz C, Cabrejo L, Slaoui T, et al. Outcomes of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy according to gender: a clinical registry study and systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:2104–2110.
      1. Arnold M, Kappeler L, Nedeltchev K, Brekenfeld C, Fischer U, Keserue B, et al. Recanalization and outcome after intra-arterial thrombolysis in middle cerebral artery and internal carotid artery occlusion: does sex matter. Stroke 2007;38:1281–1285.
      1. Elkind MS, Prabhakaran S, Pittman J, Koroshetz W, Jacoby M, Johnston KC. GAIN Americas Investigators. Sex as a predictor of outcomes in patients treated with thrombolysis for acute stroke. Neurology 2007;68:842–848.
      1. Martínez-Sánchez P, Fuentes B, Alonso de, Masjuan J, Simal P, Egido J, et al. Female gender is a factor of worse outcome in acute stroke even after thrombolytic treatment. Int J Stroke 2011;6:371–372.
      1. Buijs JE, Uyttenboogaart M, Brouns R, de Keyser J, Kamphuisen PW, Luijckx GJ. The effect of age and sex on clinical outcome after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:312–316.
      1. Spaander FH, Zinkstok SM, Baharoglu IM, Gensicke H, Polymeris A, Traenka C, et al. Sex differences and functional outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 2017;48:699–703.
      1. Hametner C, Kellert L, Ringleb PA. Impact of sex in stroke thrombolysis: a coarsened exact matching study. BMC Neurol 2015;15:10.
      1. Al-hussain F, Hussain MS, Molina C, Uchino K, Shuaib A, Demchuk AM, et al. Does the sex of acute stroke patients influence the effectiveness of rt-PA? BMC Neurol 2014;14:60.
      1. Lasek-Bal A, Puz P, Kazibutowska Z. Efficacy and safety assessment of alteplase in the treatment of stroke-gender differences. Neurol Res 2014;36:851–856.
      1. Nathanson D, Patrone C, Nyström T, von Euler M. Sex, diastolic blood pressure, and outcome after thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Stroke Res Treat 2014;2014:747458.
      1. Jovanović DR, Beslać-Bumbasirević Lj, Budimkić M, Pekmezović T, Zivković M, Kostić VS. Do women benefit more from systemic thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke? A Serbian experience with thrombolysis in ischemic stroke (SETIS) study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:729–732.
      1. Gómez-Choco M, Obach V, Urra X, Amaro S, Cervera A, Vargas M, et al. The response to IV rt-PA in very old stroke patients. Eur J Neurol 2008;15:253–256.
      1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587.
      1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 1998;352:1245–1251.
      1. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 2007;369:275–282.
      1. Kain K, Carter AM, Bamford JM, Grant PJ, Catto AJ. Gender differences in coagulation and fibrinolysis in white subjects with acute ischemic stroke. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:390–392.
      1. Kain K, Catto AJ, Carter AM, Young J, Bamford J, Bavington J, et al. Decreased fibrinolytic potential in South Asian women with ischaemic cerebrovascular disease. Br J Haematol 2001;114:155–161.
      1. Ribo M, Montaner J, Molina CA, Arenillas JF, Santamarina E, Alvarez-Sabín J. Admission fibrinolytic profile predicts clot lysis resistance in stroke patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Thromb Haemost 2004;91:1146–1151.
      1. Savitz SI, Schlaug G, Caplan L, Selim M. Arterial occlusive lesions recanalize more frequently in women than in men after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration for acute stroke. Stroke 2005;36:1447–1451.
      1. De Silva DA, Ebinger M, Davis SM. Gender issues in acute stroke thrombolysis. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:501–504.
      1. Mazighi M, Serfaty JM, Labreuche J, Laissy JP, Meseguer E, Lavallée PC, et al. Comparison of intravenous alteplase with a combined intravenous-endovascular approach in patients with stroke and confirmed arterial occlusion (RECANALISE study): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:802–809.
      1. Khatri P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA;. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009;73:1066–1072.
      1. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014;384:1929–1935.
      1. Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, Khatri P, Skoloudik D, Mokin M, et al. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation 2013;127:1980–1985.
      1. Yang SH, Shi J, Day AL, Simpkins JW. Estradiol exerts neuroprotective effects when administered after ischemic insult. Stroke 2000;31:745–749.
      1. Liao S, Chen W, Kuo J, Chen C. Association of serum estrogen level and ischemic neuroprotection in female rats. Neurosci Lett 2001;297:159–162.
      1. Schierbeck LL, Rejnmark L, Tofteng CL, Stilgren L, Eiken P, Mosekilde L, et al. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in recently postmenopausal women: randomised trial. BMJ 2012;345:e6409
      1. Shahar E, Folsom AR, Salomaa VV, Stinson VL, McGovern PG, Shimakawa T, et al. Relation of hormone-replacement therapy to measures of plasma fibrinolytic activity. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Circulation 1996;93:1970–1975.
      1. Gebara OC, Mittleman MA, Sutherland P, Lipinska I, Matheney T, Xu P, et al. Association between increased estrogen status and increased fibrinolytic potential in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation 1995;91:1952–1958.
      1. Klungel OH, Martens EP, Psaty BM, Grobbee DE, Sullivan SD, Stricker BH, et al. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1223–1231.
      1. Bosco JL, Silliman RA, Thwin SS, Geiger AM, Buist DS, Prout MN, et al. A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:64–74.
      1. Liang W, Zhao Y, Lee AH. An investigation of the significance of residual confounding effect. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:658056.
      1. Groenwold RH, Klungel OH, Altman DG, van der Graaf Y, Hoes AW, Moons KG. PROTECT WP2. Adjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confounding. CMAJ 2013;185:401–406.
      1. Shah SH, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Starkman S, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, et al. Influence of gender on outcomes after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2006;66:1745–1746.
    Cited by
    Crossref 4
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 10
    Scopus 18
    Web of Science 14
    MeSH Terms
    Female
    Hemorrhage
    Humans
    Intracranial Hemorrhages
    Male
    Population Characteristics
    Prevalence
    Public Health
    Publication Bias
    Sex Characteristics
    Stroke*
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 8

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    PERMALINK