Abstract
One objective of the WelfareQuality® project was to propose a standardised assessment method that could be used to provide transparent information on farm animal welfare to all relevant stakeholders. As described in earlier chapters, Welfare Quality® therefore built welfare assessment systems for cattle, pigs and poultry incorporating numerous measures based preferably on the animals but also to a lesser extent on resources and management of animal units (farms or slaughter plants). Of course, the substantial amount of data gathered during assessment needs to be meaningfully interpreted in terms of welfare and then integrated to provide an overall evaluation of the animal unit. Therefore, Welfare Quality® designed a scoring model to integrate the data and to translate value judgements into refined and easily understandable information that could serve various purposes and guide the decisions of stakeholders (including consumers) with regard to farm animal welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bekoff, M. (2008). Why ‘good welfare’ isn’t ‘good enough’: minding animals and increasing our compassionate footprint. ARBS Annual Review of Biomedical Sciences, Theme Topic on ‘Unraveling Animal Welfare’, 10, T1-T14.
Botreau, R., Bracke, M.B.M., Perny, P., Butterworth, A., Capdeville, J., Van Reenen, C.G. and Veissier, I. (2007). Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare: Part 2 – Analysis of constraints. Animal, 1, 1188–1197.
Botreau, R., Capdeville, J., Perny, P. and Veissier, I. (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of animal welfare at farm level; an application to MCDA methodologies. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 33, 287–316.
Botreau, R. and Veissier, I. (2011). Priorities between welfare issues: experts’ choices made in the Welfare Quality®project. In: UFAW (ed.) UFAW International Symposium 2011: Making animal welfare improvements: economic and other incentives and constraints, UFAW, London, UK.
Botreau, R., Veissier, I. and Perny, P. (2009). Overall assessment of cow welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality®. Animal Welfare, 18, 363–370.
Bracke, M.B.M., Spruijt, B.M. and Metz, J.H.M. (1999). Overall animal welfare assessment reviewed. Part 1: Is it possible? Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 47, 273–291.
Butterworth, A. (2009). Animal welfare indicators and their use in society. In: Smulders, H. and Algers, B. (eds.) Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks. Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health Series no. 5. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 371–389.
De Vries, M., Van Schaik, G., Bokkers, E.A.M., Dijkstra, T. and De Boer, I.J.M. (2011). Characteristics of dairy herds in different Welfare Quality catergories. In: Widowski, T., Lawlis, P. and Sheppard, K. (eds.), Proceedings of 5th international conference on the assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, p. 9.
Faure, J.M., Bessei, W. and Jones, R.B. (2003). Direct selection for improvement of animal well-being. In: Muir, Aggrey, E. (eds.) Poultry breeding and biotechnology. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 221–245.
Fraser, D. (1995). Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Animal Welfare, 4, 103–117.
Grabisch, M. and Roubens, M. (2000). Application of the Choquet integral in multicriteria decision making. In: Grabish, M., Murofushi, T. and Sugeno, M. (eds.) Fuzzy measures and Integrals – theory and applications; studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 348–374.
Holm, L., Ritz, C. and Ladewig, J. (2007). Measuring animal preferences: shape of double demand curves and the effect of procedure used for varying workloads on their cross-point. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 107, 133–146.
Miele, M., Veissier, I. and Evans, A. (2011). Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare, 20, 103–117.
Tuyttens, F.A.M., Vanhonacker, F., Van Poucke, E. and Verbeke, W. (2010). Quantitative verification of the correspondence between the Welfare Quality® operational definition of farm animal welfare and the opinion of Flemish farmers, citizens and vegetarians. Livestock Science, 131, 108–114.
Veissier, I., Jensen, K.K., Botreau, R. and Sandøe, P. (2011). Highlighting ethical choices underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare Quality® scheme. Animal Welfare, special issue Knowing animals, 20, 89–101.
Whay, H.R., Main, D.C.J., Green, L.E. and Webster, A.J.F. (2003). An animal-based welfare assessment of group-housed calves on UK dairy farms. Animal Welfare, 12, 611–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Botreau, R. et al. (2013). Integration of data collected on farms or at slaughter to generate an overall assessment of animal welfare. In: Blokhuis, H., Miele, M., Veissier, I., Jones, B. (eds) Improving farm animal welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-770-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-770-7_7
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-770-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)