Open Access

Identifying the differentially expressed microRNAs in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh patients in Xinjiang

  • Authors:
    • Liyun Cheng
    • Guijun Shi
    • Chunxiao Fang
    • Guanghua Li
    • Yong Zheng
    • Weigang Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 8, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.9904
  • Pages: 2657-2668
  • Copyright: © Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, the survival of patients with advanced stages of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor. Therefore, novel biomarkers that can assist with early detection of ESCC are required. In the present study, three paired ESCC and normal esophageal tissue samples from Xinjiang Kazakh patients were obtained and microRNA (miRNA) microarray analysis was used to detect the differentially‑expressed miRNAs. The target genes of the identified miRNAs were predicted using miRWalk software. A total of 23 miRNAs were differently expressed in Kazakh patients with ESCC. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis demonstrated that the upregulated miRNAs were predominantly associated with the ‘vesicle’ and ‘membrane‑bounded vesicle’ terms, while the downregulated miRNAs were primarily associated with the term ‘negative regulation of integrin‑mediated signaling pathway’. The most highly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway for the differentially‑expressed miRNAs was ‘Endocrine and other factor‑regulated calcium reabsorption’. Protein‑protein interaction network analysis revealed that IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 1, RAB11A, lysine acetyltransferase 2B, catenin α 1 and tight junction protein 2 were hub genes of the network. In conclusion, a number of differentially‑expressed miRNAs were identified in ESCC tissues samples from Xinjiang Kazakh patients, which may improve the understanding of the processes of tumorigenesis and development.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer is a common type of malignant tumor of the digestive tract that originates from the esophageal epithelium or glands (1). Based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer statistics, 455,800 new esophageal cancer cases were estimated and 400,200 mortalities occurred in 2012 worldwide, which makes the incidence and mortality rates of esophageal cancer the eighth and sixth highest in the world, respectively (2). Esophageal cancer can predominantly be divided into esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma, and >90% of esophageal cancer cases are classified as ESCC in China (3). Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, the survival rate of patients with advanced stages of ESCC remains poor. In 2014, based on a long-term follow-up survey of 21 cancer registries, the National Cancer Center estimated that the 5-year survival rate of esophageal cancer in China was 20.9% (4). The Xinjing Kazakh ethnic group is a Chinese minority with a high incidence of esophageal carcinoma (5). Studies suggest that the mortality rate of esophageal cancer for people of Kazakh ethnicity in the Xinyuan County of Xinjiang was 0.0411% between 2000 to 2005, which was much higher compared with that for individuals of the local Han ethnicity (0.0088%) (6), which suggests ESCC poses a serious threat to the health condition of Kazakh individuals. Therefore, novel biomarkers that can assist with the early detection of ESCC in Kazakh patients are urgently required.

microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs comprising of 19–24 nucleotides that regulate gene expression through post-transcriptional, RNA interference and gene silencing pathways (7). miRNAs can inhibit gene expression through complementary binding to the 3′-untranslated region of the target mRNAs (8). miRNAs have been demonstrated to be crucial for cancer initiation, progression and dissemination (9). It has been identified that >50% of miRNAs are encoded in chromosome fragile sites, which are frequently absent, amplified or rearranged in malignant tumor cells, thereby resulting in the dysregulated expression of miRNAs (10). An estimated 30% of human protein-coding genes are regulated by miRNAs (11). Furthermore, miRNAs serve key roles in tumor progression and resistance to chemotherapy by regulating the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (12). Previous studies have indicated that various miRNAs are associated with ESCC in Kazakh patients (13,14). However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have performed an analysis on the whole genome level. In recent years, the combination of high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis has made it possible to analyze the role of miRNAs that are differently expressed in ESCC in Kazakh patients. In the present study, to identify miRNA signatures in ESCC in Kazakh patients and uncover their potential mechanisms, microarray analysis was used to identify differently-expressed miRNAs between three paired ESCC and normal esophageal tissue samples from Kazakh patients. Furthermore, bioinformatic methods were used to analyze the functions of the differentially-expressed miRNAs.

Patients and methods

Clinical characteristics and tissue samples

A total of 13 samples of ESCC tissue and corresponding adjacent normal tissue were obtained from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated surgically at the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University (Shihezi, China) from November 2014 to September 2015. Among them, three samples were used for microarray testing, including two samples obtained from males and one from a female (age range, 63–70 years). In addition, ten samples were used for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis, including five from males and five from females (age range, 62–75 years). No patients had a history of smoking and drinking, and no chemoradiotherapy was received prior to surgery. All tumors were stage T2N1M0 (15). All tumor samples were confirmed by two pathologists as moderately differentiated ESCC. The collection of specimens was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University and authorized by the patients or family members. Each tissue sample was transferred to liquid nitrogen immediately following surgery and stored in a −80°C freezer. All microarray experiments were completed at CapitalBio Corporation (Beijing, China).

RNA extraction and whole genome miRNA profiling

Total RNA was isolated from ~2–3 g (2×2×2 cm3) of tumor tissue samples and the corresponding normal tissue samples. Total RNA from frozen tumor tissue samples was extracted using an Ambion mirVana miRNA Isolation kit (Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality and quantity of total RNA samples were tested using a spectrophotometer. A preparation of RNA with an A260/A280 ratio of 1.8–2.0 was used for the microarray analysis. Formaldehyde denaturing gel electrophoresis was also used to test the quality of total RNA. When the 28S:18S ribosomal RNA ≥1:1, it met the experimental requirements for gene chip array analysis. Affymetrix GeneChip miRNA 4.0 Arrays (Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were used to detect the miRNAs in the samples. All miRNAs were labeled with biotin using a FlashTap RNA Labeling kit (Genisphere LLC, Hatfield, PA, USA), and subsequently chip hybridization and data analysis were performed. According to Significance Analysis of Microarrays software R2.0 (16), q<0.05 and fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5 indicated a statistically significant differentially expressed miRNA.

Prediction of miRNA targets and functional enrichment analysis

The target genes of the identified miRNAs were predicted using miRWalk (http://mirwalk.uni-hd.de/), which includes 12 databases, including TargetScan, miRanda and MiRmap. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were applied using KOBAS 2.0 (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn.). Fisher's exact test was performed to classify the GO terms and KEGG pathways, and P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant GO term or KEGG pathway.

Generation of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database (https://string-db.org/cgi/input.pl) is an online tool for analyzing protein-protein interaction information. To analyze the interactions of the target genes, the genes were mapped to the STRING database and a PPI network was constructed. Cytoscape 3.6.0 (17) was used to visualize the PPI network and identify the hub genes. The node degrees of the target genes were analyzed and the first five were selected as the network's hub genes.

Integration of miRNA-mRNA co-expression network

The correlation test within the ‘stats’ package in R 2.15.3 (http://www.R-project.org/) was used for the co-expression analysis. According to the principle of negative interaction between miRNA and mRNA, a miRNA-mRNA co-expression network was integrated using P<0.05 and correlation coefficient <-0.99, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for the correlation analysis. Cytoscape software was then used to generate a co-expression network.

RT-qPCR

An additional 10 Kazakh ESCC tissue samples and corresponding adjacent normal tissue samples were obtained for RT-qPCR verification. Total RNA extraction was performed using the aforementioned method. Subsequently, a miRcute miRNA First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit and a miRcute miRNA qPCR Detection kit (SYBR® Green; both from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were used to detect the levels of miRNA, according to the manufacturer's protocols. U6 was used as an internal control. The RT reaction system (20 µl) contained 2 µl total RNA, 10 µl 2X miRNA RT reaction buffer, 2 µl miRNA RT enzyme mix and 6 µl RNase-free ddH2O. The reactions were performed at 42°C for 60 min and 95°C for 3 min. The 20 µl reaction system for qPCR included 10 µl 2X miRcute Plus miRNA Premix (with SYBR and ROX), 1 µl forward primer, 0.4 µl reverse primer (10 µM), 2 µl first-strand cDNA and 6.6 µl ddH2O. Amplification was performed under the following reaction conditions: 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 20 sec and 60°C for 34 sec. qPCR was performed on a CFX96 Real-Time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) using the following forward primers: U6, 5′-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′; miR-664b-5p, 5′-TGGGCTAAGGGAGATGATTGGGTA-3′; miR-767-5p, 5′-TGCACCATGGTTGTCTGAGCATG-3′; miR-223-3p, 5′-GCGTGTCAGTTTGTCAAATACCCCA-3′; miR-203a, 5′-cgcAGTGGTTCTTAACAGTTCAACAGTT-3′; miR-373, 5′-GACGAGCCCCTCGCACAAAC-3′. The reverse primers were contained in the miRcute miRNA qPCR Detection kit. Relative quantification of miRNA expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method (18) the data were statistically analyzed by Student's t-tests, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant differences between groups. For each sample, all experiments were performed in triplicate.

Results

Identification of differentially-expressed miRNAs

To determine the miRNA expression patterns in ESCC tissue samples and their corresponding normal tissue samples, miRNA microarray analysis was conducted. A total of 23 miRNAs were identified to be significantly differentially expressed between the two groups; 12 miRNAs were upregulated and 11 miRNAs were downregulated. As demonstrated in Figs. 1 and 2, the expression of these miRNAs differed between Kazakh ESCC and matched normal tissues. The differentially expressed-miRNAs are displayed in Table I.

Table I.

Expression of microRNAs in Kazakh esophagus squamous cell carcinoma tissues and corresponding normal tissues.

Table I.

Expression of microRNAs in Kazakh esophagus squamous cell carcinoma tissues and corresponding normal tissues.

Gene nameFold changeq-valueRegulation
hsa-miR-664b-5p26.48850.0316Up
hsa-miR-767-5p25.06850.0316Up
hsa-miR-1301-3p8.50110Up
hsa-miR-93-3p8.38470Up
hsa-miR-21-3p7.98490Up
hsa-miR-25-5p6.93620.0195Up
hsa-miR-36515.97440Up
hsa-miR-99b-5p5.04150.0316Up
hsa-miR-223-3p4.34350Up
hsa-miR-505-5p3.58620Up
hsa-miR-1273h-5p3.02830Up
hsa-miR-423-5p2.40300.0195Up
hsa-miR-60860.41950.0397Down
hsa-miR-3663-3p0.33560.0373Down
hsa-miR-378e0.31600.0373Down
hsa-miR-51000.29010.0498Down
hsa-miR-1273g-3p0.21630Down
hsa-miR-422a0.13720.0397Down
hsa-miR-1224-5p0.12770.0373Down
hsa-miR-203a0.10940.0397Down
hsa-miR-6170.08180Down
hsa-miR-3750.06660.0373Down
hsa-miR-5580-3p0.01860Down
Target gene prediction

miRWalk 2.0 was used to predict the target genes of the differentially-expressed miRNAs. Of the 23 differentially-expressed miRNAs, 224 target genes were predicted for 21 miRNAs, as presented in Table II.

Table II.

Target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs.

Table II.

Target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs.

miRNATarget geneExpression
hsa-miR-99b-5pN4BP3Up
hsa-miR-93-3pABLIM1, AMFR, C6orf132, CCNG2, COL4A3BP, CYP11A1, FAM46B, FYCO1, GANC, GIPC1, H2AFY, IKZF2, KLF8, KLHL2, LCOR, LYNX1, MUC1, N4BP3, NFIA, PRNP, RMND5B, SIM2, SLC12A7, SORT1, TMEM201, TPCN1, TRPS1Up
hsa-miR-767-5pABLIM1, ARSB, ATP1B1, CCNG2, CD276, CDH3, CHIC2, CUL3, CYP24A1, ELOVL6, ERAP1, FAM126B, FNDC3B, FUT2, GABRP, GANC, GLI2, IQGAP1, LAMC2, LCOR, NDST1, NFIA, PHACTR4, PI15, PIK3C2A, PPL, PRDM1, RAB11A, SCNN1B, SDK1, SEC24A, SERAC1, SFXN3, SH3TC2, TET2, TGIF2, TJP2, TMEM79, TRPS1, ZBTB43Up
hsa-miR-664b-5pNFIA, LCOR, TGIF2Up
hsa-miR-505-5pAGFG2, AIF1L, CAPN5, CCDC120, CD276, CDK18, EPN3, FAM189A2, FMO2, GABRP, GANC, GDI1, IL1RN, KCNQ2, KIAA0232, KIF1C, KREMEN1, TET2, MARK2, N4BP3, NDST1, NT5C2, OCLN, PITPNM3, PRNP, RARG, RMND5B, SCP2, SDK1, SLC25A23, SLC2A3, SMAGP, SORT1,TGIF2, TMPRSS2, UNC13BUp
hsa-miR-423-5pARSB, ABR, ADCY6, AGFG2, ANXA9, ARHGAP32, ARHGEF10L, B4GALNT1, BAG1, CACNG4, CAPN5, CD276, CSF1, CUL3, CYP4F22,DIAPH1, ELF3, ELOVL6, EMP1, ESRP2, FAM129B, FBXO34, FOSL2, FYCO1,GANC, GATSL3, GDI1, GPX3, HEXIM1, HLF, KREMEN1, LCOR, LYNX1,MAP3K9, MARK2, MGLL, MKNK2, N4BP3, NAT14, NCCRP1, NDST1, NPR3,PAQR8, PDLIM5, PI15, PIM1, PMM1, PRDM1, PTK6, RAB25, RABGAP1L,RALB, RFFL, SAR1B, SDK1, SH3TC2, SLC25A23, SLC2A3, SLC35C1, SORT1,ST6GALNAC6, THRB, TMEM144, TMEM201, TOM1, TPCN1, TRPS1, TYRO3, VAT1, VAV3Up
hsa-miR-3651COBLL1, FBXO34, IKZF2, MGLL, NFIA, SLC17A5, ST3GAL4, TRIM13, VAV3Up
hsa-miR-25-5pABR, BNIPL, EXPH5, FAM114A1, FUT2, MARK2, KIF1C, OCLN, PHACTR4, TGIF2, TRIM9, ZNF185Up
hsa-miR-223-3pABLIM1, ACPP, AIM1, ATP1B1, C1orf116, CAMSAP1, CAPN14, CDKN2AIP, CDOCK9, FAM219B, HEXIM1, HLF, LAMC2, LCOR, LIN54, LNPEP, TAOK3, RALGPS2, MSMO1, NCCRP1, NFIA, PIK3C2A, PLD1, PRDM1, RAB11FIP1, ABGAP1L, RASEF, SFXN3, SH3TC2, SIM2, SLC26A2, TRPS1, TWF1, DS1Up
hsa-miR-21-3pAMFR, ATP1B1, CAMSAP1, CAPN5, CD46, CDK18, COBLL1, CUL3, WDR47, FAM135A, FAM219B, FNDC3B, FYCO1, HLF, LCOR, LIN54, LYNX1, STAU2, MGLL, MLLT4, NPR3, OCLN, PCYOX1, PI15, PLOD1, PMM1, PRDM1, TET2, PRKCH, RBM47, ROBO2, SAR1B, SLC26A2, ST6GALNAC6Up
hsa-miR-1301-3pAGFG2, ARHGAP32, BACH1, CAMSAP1, CAPN14, CCNG2, CD276, MOXD1, CLCN3, CXCL1, DIAPH1, ELF3, EPN3, FAM114A1, FAM219B, CD46, FYCO1, GANC, GRHL1, IKZF2, KLHL2, KREMEN1, LAMB3, LCOR, PRDM1, SORT1, FUT2, LIN54, LYNX1, MMP11, FBXO34, TET2, NAPA, NDST1, NFIA, TRPS1, NT5C2, PAQR8, PCSK5, PITX1, PRNP, RBM47, ROBO2, SAR1B, VAV3, TOM1, SASH1, SH3TC2, SIM2, SLC25A23, SLC26A2, ZBTB43, TMEM108, TOM1L2, TMEM201, TRIM9, NPR3,Up
hsa-miR-1273g-3pABLIM1, ARSB, CAMSAP1, CCNG2, CLCN3, GNE, GOLGA2, LIN54, NFIA, PCYOX1, PRDM1, RABGAP1L, RFFL, SDK1, SH3TC2Down
hsa-miR-1224-5pABLIM1, AIF1L, ALDH9A1, B4GALNT1, CAPN5, CD207, ZBTB43, SLC2A3, CYP4F22, FAM129B, FBXO34, FMO2, FNDC3B, FYCO1, HEXIM1, USP54, KAT2B, KIAA0232, PITPNM3, LCOR, MARVELD3, MOXD1, NAT14, NDRG2,PAQR8, PCYOX1, PHACTR4, TMEM108, PITX1, RAI1, RBM47, SCP2, SDK1,SLC35C1, SNX33, TMPRSS11B, TRIM13, TRPS1, UPRT, EPN3, THRB, CUL3, DLX1, BAG1Down
hsa-miR-617ABHD17B, AMFR, ARHGAP32, CAPN5, CCDC150, CDS1, CUL3, ERAP1, FAM219B, FNDC3B, GABRP, GRHL1, HES5, HLF, HOOK3, KANK1, LYNX1, NDST1, NFIA, OCLN, PCYOX1, PRKCH, RAB11FIP1, RALGPS2, SEC24A, SH3TC2, SLC26A2, SORT1, TET2, TGIF2, TMEM201Down
hsa-miR-6086MARK2, GIPC1Down
hsa-miR-5580-3pARHGAP32, ATP1B1, ERAP1, ESRP1, FAM126B, FMO2, FNDC3B, SPTLC1, KLF8, MLLT4, GNE, PCYOX1, PI15, PIK3C2A, PRDM1, PRKCH, TMEM108, SAR1B, SH3TC2, SLC2A3, NFIA, OCLN, RASEFDown
hsa-miR-5100ANXA9, ARHGAP32, BARX2, EXPH5, FAM114A1, KANK1, KLB, NPR3, RAB11A, RALB, PRKCH, PHACTR4Down
hsa-miR-422aABR, ALDH3A2, AMFR, CCNG2, COL4A3BP, CTNNA1, CUL3, DLX1, ESRP2, VAT1, C1orf116, GOLPH3L, HOOK3, IKZF2, KLF8, LIN54, MOXD1, SH3TC2, NDST1, NR1H2, PAQR8, PCYOX1, PEBP1, PI15, PIM1, PIM2, PLOD1, PRKCH, RAB11A, SLC2A3, SLC35C1, TWF1, TRAF6, FYCO1Down
hsa-miR-378eCCNG2, GOLPH3L, PEBP1, PRKCH, RAB11A, SH3TC2, SLC2A3, TWF1Down
hsa-miR-375ABLIM1, ADCY6, AIM1, ATP1B1, BAG1, CACNG4, CAST, CLCN3, SERAC1, COBLL1, CXCL1, CXCR2, ELOVL6, FAM135A, FMO2, FNDC3B, RMND5B, IKZF2, KLF8, N4BP3, NFIA, NPR3, NT5C2, OCLN, PCYOX1, PRDM1, SAMD9, RAB11A, RALGPS2, RBM47, PLD1, SLC25A23, CDS1, GANC, ROBO2, THRB, TMEM144, TRPS1, UNC13B, TGIF2, SEC24ADown
hsa-miR-203aABLIM1, ACPP, AIF1L, AIM1, ALDH3A2, ANKRD44, ARHGAP32, ARSB, BAG1, CCNG2, CAPN14, CD46, CITED2, CLCN3, COBLL1, CUL3, CYP24A1, DUSP5, ELOVL6, HEXIM1, EMP1, GNE, EPN3, ERAP1, FAM114A1, FYCO1, FAM126B, FMO2, FNDC3B, FOSL2, GOLPH3L, GRHL3, HLF, HOOK3, IKZF2, LCOR, LIN54, MLLT4, MSMO1, GLTP, N4BP3, NPR3, OVOL1, PAQR8, PHACTR4, PI15, PIK3C2A, PITPNM3, PLD1, RAB11A, SEC24A, SDK1, VAV3, RABGAP1L, RALB, RBM47, ROBO2, SAR1B, SASH1, SCEL, SCP2, ZNF571, ZNF185, SH3TC2, SLC25A23, SLC26A2, SLC2A3, TET2, THRB, TMEM154, TRPS1, TWF1, VAT1, NFIA, ZNF442, WDR47Down

[i] miRNA, microRNA.

KEGG pathway analysis

Using KEGG pathway analysis, a total of five terms were enriched among the upregulated miRNAs and eight terms were enriched among the downregulated miRNAs. Table III presents the significantly enriched pathways of the differently-expressed miRNAs. The upregulated miRNAs were identified to be predominantly involved in the following pathways: ‘Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio series’ and ‘Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption’. The downregulated miRNAs were revealed to be involved in the following pathways: ‘Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption’, ‘Lysine degradation’ and ‘Steroid biosynthesis’.

Table III.

Top Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment terms for the differentially expressed microRNAs.

Table III.

Top Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment terms for the differentially expressed microRNAs.

TermIDP-valueRegulation
Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio serieshsa006040.012Up
Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorptionhsa049610.014Up
Steroid biosynthesishsa001000.020Up
Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-lacto and neolacto serieshsa006010.032Up
Thyroid hormone synthesishsa049180.040Up
Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorptionhsa049610.015Down
Lysine degradationhsa003100.018Down
Steroid biosynthesishsa001000.020Down
Endocytosishsa041440.025Down
Histidine metabolismhsa003400.026Down
GO term enrichment analysis

To further understand the associated functions of the differently-expressed miRNAs, GO analysis was performed. GO enrichment analysis included the categories cellular component, biological process and molecular function. A total of 750 terms were enriched for the upregulated miRNAs (Fig. 3) and 888 terms were enriched for the downregulated miRNAs (Fig. 4).

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis

Based on the information in the STRING database, a PPI network (Fig. 5) of the target genes was generated. Cytoscape software analysis of the target genes in the network revealed a maximum node degree of seven and a minimum of one. The following top five hub genes were selected: IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1), RAB11A, lysine acetyltransferase 2B (KAT2B), catenin α 1 (CTNNA1) and tight junction protein 2 (TJP2).

Integration of miRNA-mRNA co-expression network

According to the principle of negative interaction between miRNA and mRNA, miRNAs and mRNAs with a correlation coefficient <-0.99 were selected to establish the miRNA-mRNA co-expression network using Cytoscape software. The network comprised of 273 nodes and 326 edges. As depicted in Fig. 6, the network consisted of 21 miRNAs (11 upregulated and 10 downregulated) and 252 mRNAs. The co-expression network demonstrates that the mRNAs may be potential target genes of the differently-expressed miRNAs and the mRNAs may be involved in the occurrence and development of ESCC.

Identification of final target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs

If the target mRNAs predicted by miRWalk also appeared in the co-expression network they were designated as the final target genes. A total of 25 mRNAs and 11 miRNAs were presented in the co-expression network (Fig. 7).

Validation of microarray data using RT-qPCR

To validate the microarray data, RT-qPCR was performed to detect the expression level of certain selected differentially-expressed miRNAs, including miR-664b-5p, miR-767-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-203a and miR-375. The RT-qPCR results and microarray data were consistent (Fig. 8).

Discussion

The incidence of esophageal cancer is not only associated with environmental factors, living habits, microorganisms and other external factors, but also closely associated with genetic factors and differential gene expression (19). Therefore, it is important to investigate the differentially-expressed genes involved in the pathogenesis of esophageal carcinoma. Microarray and high-throughput sequencing technology are beneficial methods for detecting the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously; therefore, these methods are frequently used to investigate potential biological targets for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer (20,21). Although numerous studies have been devoted to the differential expression of genes associated with esophageal cancer in Kazakh patients (22,23), to the best of our knowledge, the expression of miRNAs has not been systematically evaluated. In the present study, the differentially-expressed miRNAs in Xinjiang Kazakh cases of ESCC were identified by microarray analysis and their biological functions were preliminarily analyzed. This may enrich the investigation of the gene expression profiles in Kazakh ESCC.

The present study identified 23 differentially-expressed miRNAs between ESCC and normal control tissues. Among these miRNAs, certain miRNAs have previously been identified to be differentially expressed in esophageal cancer. Li et al (24) revealed that miR-375 was frequently downregulated in ESCC and was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage, tumor metastasis and poor prognosis, which indicates that miR-375 may serve as a potential biomarker to predict the outcome of ESCC. In ESCC tissue obtained from Kazakh patients, the expression of miR-375 was also identified to be downregulated in another study (25), which is consistent with the present findings. Therefore, it could be indicated that miR-375 acts as a tumor suppressor in ESCC. Wang et al (26) reported that miR-3651 was downregulated in ESCC of Han patients, and was negatively correlated with T stage and tumor size. However, in the present study it was identified that miR-3651 was upregulated. This difference may be explained by differences between the sample populations. Han and Kazakh patients may have different miRNA expression profiles, and miR-3651 may serve a different role in ESCC in patients of the two ethnicities. miR-203 has been demonstrated to be downregulated in a number of malignant tumor types, including laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (27), hepatocellular carcinoma (28), cervical cancer (29) and lung cancer (30). Similar to the current study, Li et al (31) demonstrated that miR-203a is downregulated in ESCC samples and the transfection of miR-203a in cells mimicking esophageal cancer inhibited their proliferation and invasive capacity, indicating that miR-203a serves a tumor suppressor role. Several studies have identified that miR-21-3p is upregulated in ESCC tissue samples, which indicates miR-21-3p may serve as an oncogene by participating in the invasion and metastasis of esophageal cancer (32). Similar to the present study, Liu et al (33). reported that miR-21 is highly expressed in esophageal cancer in patients of Kazakh ethnicity, and serves a negative role in regulating programmed cell death. miR-25, a member of the miR-106b-25 cluster (34), has been identified to be overexpressed in several cancer types, including small cell lung, gastric and liver cancer (31,3537). Xu et al (38) demonstrated that high expression of miR-25 is associated with lymph node metastasis and Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage in patients with ESCC. This study suggests that miRNA-25 is upregulated in Kazakh ESCC and may serve a role as an oncogene.

Furthermore, certain differentially-expressed miRNAs identified in the present study have previously been reported in other various cancer types, including breast cancer, glioma, lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (3943), but have not been previously identified in Kazakh ESCC. These miRNAs may serve important roles in the development and progression of ESCC. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, certain miRNAs revealed in the present study have not previously been reported in any tumor types, therefore these may be potential novel markers of Kazakh ESCC. Further experiments are required to verify this observation. Additionally, RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression levels of certain miRNAs, including miR-664b-5p, miR-767-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-203a and miR-375, which were identified to be differentially expressed using microarray analysis. These results confirmed that RT-qPCR and gene chip detection were in accordance, which supports the accuracy of the microarray results.

The number and type of differentially expressed miRNAs in the current study varies from previous studies (20,44). A number of factors can affect the results of microarray analysis, including the homogeneity of the sample and differences in the chips used. The current study maximized homogeneity in the selection of samples. All patients were diagnosed with primary ESCC. No patients had a history of smoking and drinking, and no chemoradiotherapy was received prior to surgery. All cancer specimens were confirmed as moderately differentiated ESCC and the tumor staging was T2N1M0. It can be hypothesized that differences with previous studies may be associated with differences in the number of samples, the region the samples were acquired from, experimental conditions, research methods, the specific chips used and the data analysis methods. Furthermore, due to different genetic backgrounds, the gene expression profile of ESCC may be different in Kazakh patients compared with Han patients. Therefore, studying the specific markers of Kazakh ESCC is important for understanding its pathogenesis.

KEGG analysis demonstrated that the differentially expressed miRNAs were mainly involved in ‘glycolipid biosynthesis’, ‘endocrine and other glycolipid-related factors regulating calcium reabsorption’ and ‘steroid biosynthesis’. According to a previous study, abnormal expression of glycolipids in tissues and organs may lead to carcinogenesis (45), and the abnormal metabolism of steroids is closely associated with the occurrence, metastasis and treatment of tumors (46). Calcium ion is an important second messenger within the cell. It can participate in the proliferation, differentiation, metastasis and apoptosis of tumors in numerous ways. Therefore, the abnormal absorption of calcium ions in cells may be closely associated with tumorigenesis (47). GO analysis indicated that the upregulated miRNAs were mainly associated with vesicles and exocrine bodies. By contrast, the downregulated miRNAs were mainly associated with the negative regulation of integrin-mediated signaling pathways, lipid binding and other functions. The exosecretion (48) and integrin-mediated signaling pathways (49) have previously been confirmed to be associated with tumors. The upregulation or downregulation of these functions may directly or indirectly lead to the occurrence and development of tumors, which suggests the differentially expressed miRNAs associated with these biological processes may be associated with ESCC. However, the specific mechanisms remain to be further elucidated.

As demonstrated in the PPI network, IQGAP1, RAB11A, KAT2B, CTNNA1 and TJP2 were identified as hub genes. IQGAP1 is a scaffolding protein that can regulate several distinct signaling pathways (50). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that IQGAP1 serves an important role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Andl et al (51) demonstrated that IQGAP1 was overexpressed in ESCC tumor tissues and its overexpression was correlated with the invasion depth of ESCC. Therefore, IQGAP1 may be important in regulating ESCC occurrence and progression and may be useful in developing a novel anticancer therapy. Xu et al (52) identified that RAB11A was upregulated in ESCC and may serve a critical role in the development of ESCC. Other studies have demonstrated that KAT2B, CTNNA1 and TJP2 are important in multiple tumor types, including hepatocellular carcinoma, cervical cancer and breast cancer (5355), however their roles in ESCC are not clear. In the current study, these three genes were targeted by the differentially expressed miRNAs in Kazakh ESCC, which suggests that they may also serve an important role in the development of ESCC.

The occurrence and development of esophageal cancer is associated with a number of factors. The most common risk factors of esophageal cancer include smoking, drinking and human papillomavirus infection. miRNAs are also widely involved in the progression of tumor formation (19). The effect of different risk factors and clinicopathological features on the expression of miRNA in esophageal cancer can be analyzed by gene chip technology, a method used to understand molecular mechanisms and provide diagnostic markers or new targets for therapy (44). Unfortunately, due to the limitation of the sample size in the current study, the correlations were not explored between the differential expression of miRNAs, clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors. Future studies should investigate these correlations by expanding the sample size.

The current study predicted the target genes of the differentially expressed miRNAs and then used bioinformatics to analyze the functions of these genes. The differentially expressed miRNAs may serve important roles by regulating these functions. Although the mechanisms of how the differentially expressed miRNAs contribute to the development of Kazakh ESCC are unknown, the findings of the current study provides the prerequisite for a future study to identify useful markers for diagnosing and treating Kazakh ESCC. Subsequent experiments are required to further clarify the roles and mechanisms of the differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes in ESCC both in vivo and in vitro.

In conclusion, the current study performed a preliminary analysis of the biological effects of differentially expressed miRNAs in ESCC in Kazakh patients, which may be associated with the occurrence of the disease. Several potential target genes of these miRNAs were also identified. Studying these target genes can increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, which in turn can assist the discovery of improved uses of these differential miRNAs, possibly as markers of clinical diagnosis or therapeutic targets. The current findings can apply not only to all patients with ESCC, but also Kazakh patients with unique clinicopathological features. Further studies are needed to verify the role of these differentially expressed miRNAs in Kazakh ESCC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The current study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81260362).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YZ and WC conceived and designed the experiments. GS made substantial contributions to tissue sample collection. LC and GS performed the experiments. LC, GS, CF and GL analyzed the data. LC, CF and GL drafted and revised the manuscript. LC prepared the figures and tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained for the present study from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

SCC

squamous cell carcinoma

ESCC

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

miRNA

microRNA

GO

Gene Ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

PPI

protein-protein interaction

STRING

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins

References

1 

Li C, Xia G, Jianqing Z, Mei Y, Ge B and Li Z: Serum differential protein identification of Xinjiang Kazakh esophageal cancer patients based on the two-dimensional liquid-phase chromatography and LTQ MS. Mol Biol Rep. 41:2893–2905. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Wang J, Jia Y, Wang N, Zhang X, Tan B, Zhang G and Cheng Y: The clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and neutrophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 12:72014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, Zhang S, Zou X, Wang N, Zhang L, Tang J, Chen J, Wei K, et al: Cancer survival in China, 2003–2005: A population-based study. Int J Cancer. 136:1921–1930. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zhang Y: Distribution of Esophageal Cancer in Xinjiang. J Xinjiang Med Univ. 11:139–145. 1988.(In Chinese).

6 

Wang XM, Jie ES and Yan-Qing MA: Case-control study on risk factors of esophageal cancer in Xinjiang Kazakh nationality. Chinese J Public Health. 23:737–738. 2007.(In Chinese).

7 

Kozomara A and Griffithsjones S: miRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D68–D73. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Baek D, Villén J, Shin C, Camargo FD, Gygi SP and Bartel DP: The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature. 455:64–71. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Harada K, Baba Y, Ishimoto T, Shigaki H, Kosumi K, Yoshida N, Watanabe M and Baba H: The role of microRNA in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 51:520–530. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Laganà A, Russo F, Sismeiro C, Giugno R, Pulvirenti A and Ferro A: Variability in the incidence of miRNAs and genes in fragile sites and the role of repeats and CpG islands in the distribution of genetic material. PLoS One. 5:e111662010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Friedman JM and Jones PA: MicroRNAs: Critical mediators of differentiation, development and disease. Swiss Med Wkly. 139:466–472. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Gao W, Shen H, Liu L, Xu J, Xu J and Shu Y: MiR-21 overexpression in human primary squamous cell lung carcinoma is associated with poor patient prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 137:557–566. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Hu JM, Chang AM, Chen YZ, Yuan XL and Li F: Regulatory Role of miR-203 in occurrence and progression of kazakh esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 6:237802016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Song X, You W, Zhu J, Cui X, Hu J, Chen Y, Liu W, Wang L, Li S, Wei Y, et al: A genetic variant in miRNA-219-1 is associated with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in chinese kazakhs. Dis Markers. 2015:5415312015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Miyazaki Y, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Nakajima K, Takiguchi S, Mori M and Doki Y: Evaluation of the nodal status in the 7th edition of the UICC-TNM classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Proposed modifications for improved survival stratification: Impact of lymph node metastases on overall survival after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:2850–2856. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Zhao T and Liu H: ‘Sparse Additive Machine’, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2012.

17 

Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B and Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13:2498–2504. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrandez Arenas A and Lanas Arbeloa A: Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in Western and Eastern countries. World J Gastroenterol. 21:7933–7943. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Guo Y, Chen Z, Zhang L, Zhou F, Shi S, Feng X, Li B, Meng X, Ma X, Luo M, et al: Distinctive microRNA profiles relating to patient survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 68:26–33. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al: MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 435:834–838. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Yang L, Ji Y, Chen L, Li M, Wu F, Hu J, Jiang J, Cui X, Chen Y, Pang L, et al: Genetic variability in LMP2 and LMP7 is associated with the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the Kazakh population but is not associated with HPV infection. PLoS One. 12:e01863192017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zhou YX, Zhou KM, Liu Q, Wang H, Wang W, Shi Y and Ma YQ: The effect of Glut1 and c-myc on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh and Han patients. Future Oncol. 14:1801–1815. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Li J, Li X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang L, Qin Y, Liu H, Fu L and Guan XY: Cell-specific detection of mir-375 downregulation for predicting the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by miRNA in situ hybridization. PLoS One. 8:e535822013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Huang G: Erratum: Differential expression of miR-21 and miR-75 in esophageal carcinoma patients and its clinical implication. Am J Transl Res. 9:19612017.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wang C, Guan S, Chen X, Liu B, Liu F, Han L, Un Nesa E, Song Q, Bao C, Wang X and Cheng Y: Clinical potential of miR-3651 as a novel prognostic biomarker for esophageal squamous cell cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 465:30–34. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Tian L, Li M, Ge J, Guo Y, Sun Y, Liu M and Xiao H: MiR-203 is downregulated in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and can suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis of tumours. Tumour Biol. 35:5953–5963. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Liu Y, Ren F, Rong M, Luo Y, Dang Y and Chen G: Association between underexpression of microrna-203 and clinicopathological significance in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues. Cancer Cell Int. 15:622015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Mao L, Zhang Y, Mo W, Yu Y and Lu H: BANF1 is downregulated by IRF1-regulated microRNA-203 in cervical cancer. PLoS One. 10:e01170352015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Wang N, Liang H, Zhou Y, Wang C, Zhang S, Pan Y, Wang Y, Yan X, Zhang J, Zhang CY, et al: miR-203 suppresses the proliferation and migration and promotes the apoptosis of lung cancer cells by targeting SRC. PLoS One. 9:e1055702014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Li Y, Tan W, Neo TW, Aung MO, Wasser S, Lim SG and Tan TM: Role of the miR-106b-25microRNA cluster in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 100:1234–1242. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Yang M, Liu R, Sheng J, Liao J, Wang Y, Pan E, Guo W, Pu Y and Yin L: Differential expression profiles of microRNAs as potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 29:169–176. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Liu T, Liu Q, Zheng S, Gao X, Lu M, Yang C, Dai F, Sheyhidin I and Lu X: MicroRNA-21 promotes cell growth and migration by targeting programmed cell death 4 gene in Kazakh's esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2014:2328372014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Savita U and Karunagaran D: MicroRNA-106b-25 cluster targets β-TRCP2, increases the expression of Snail and enhances cell migration and invasion in H1299 (non small cell lung cancer) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 434:841–847. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Li BS, Zuo QF, Zhao YL, Xiao B, Zhuang Y, Mao XH, Wu C, Yang SM, Zeng H, Zou QM and Guo G: MicroRNA-25 promotes gastric cancer migration, invasion and proliferation by directly targeting transducer of ERBB2, 1 and correlates with poor survival. Oncogene. 34:2556–2565. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Zhao Z, Liu J, Wang C, Wang Y, Jiang Y and Guo M: MicroRNA-25 regulates small cell lung cancer cell development and cell cycle through cyclin E2. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7:7726–7234. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Qu J, Li M, Zhong W and Hu C: Prognostic role of microRNA-25 in cancers: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:12921–12927. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Xu X, Chen Z, Zhao X, Wang J, Ding D, Wang Z, Tan F, Tan X, Zhou F, Sun J, et al: MicroRNA-25 promotes cell migration and invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 421:640–645. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Qian J, Li R, Wang YY, Shi Y, Luan WK, Tao T, Zhang JX, Xu YC and You YP: MiR-1224-5p acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting CREB1 in malignant gliomas. Mol Cell Biochem. 403:33–41. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Huang H, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Chen T, Yang L, He H, Lin Z, Liu T, Yang T, Kamp DW, Wu B and Liu G: miR-5100 promotes tumor growth in lung cancer by targeting Rab6. Cancer Lett. 362:15–24. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Matamala N, Vargas MT, Gonzalez-Campora R, Miñambres R, Arias JI, Menéndez P, Andrés-León E, Gómez-López G, Yanowsky K, Calvete-Candenas J, et al: Tumor MicroRNA expression profiling identifies circulating MicroRNAs for early breast cancer detection. Clin Chem. 61:1098–1106. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Song W, Tang L, Xu Y, Xu J, Zhang W, Xie H, Wang S and Guan X: Corrigendum: PARP inhibitor increases chemosensitivity by upregulating miR-664b-5p in BRCA1-mutated triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 7:443462017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Zha R, Guo W, Zhang Z, Qiu Z, Wang Q, Ding J, Huang S, Chen T, Gu J, Yao M and He X: Genome-wide screening identified that miR-134 acts as a metastasis suppressor by targeting integrin β1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 9:e876652014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zang W, Wang Y, Du Y, Xuan X, Wang T, Li M, Ma Y, Li P, Chen X, Dong Z and Zhao G: Differential expression profiling of microRNAs and their potential involvement in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 35:3295–3304. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Hakomori S: Aberrant glycosylation in cancer cell membranes as focused on glycolipids: Overview and perspectives. Cancer Res. 45:2405–2414. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Alikhani N, Ferguson RD, Novosyadlyy R, Gallagher EJ, Scheinman EJ, Yakar S and LeRoith D: Mammary tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis are enhanced in a hyperlipidemic mouse model. Oncogene. 32:961–967. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Berridge MJ, Lipp P and Bootman MD: The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 1:11–21. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Zhao P, Xiao L, Peng J, Qian YQ and and Huang CC: Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improve osteoporosis through promoting osteoblast proliferation via MAPK pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 22:3962–3970. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

49 

Weyant MJ, Carothers AM, Bertagnolli ME and Bertagnolli MM: Colon cancer chemopreventive drugs modulate integrin-mediated signaling pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 6:949–956. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

50 

Choi S and Anderson RA: IQGAP1 is a phosphoinositide effector and kinase scaffold. Adv Biol Regul. 60:29–35. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Wang XX, Wang K, Li XZ, Zhai LQ, Qu CX, Zhao Y, Liu ZR, Wang HZ, An QJ, Jing LW and Wang XH: Targeted knockdown of IQGAP1 inhibits the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 9:e965012014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Xu CQ, Zhu ST, Wang M, Guo SL, Sun XJ, Cheng R, Xing J, Wang WH, Shao LL and Zhang ST: Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 19:1652–1661. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Vij M, Shanmugam NP, Reddy MS, Sankaranarayanan S and Rela M: Paediatric hepatocellular carcinoma in tight junction protein 2 (TJP2) deficiency. Virchows Arch. 471:679–683. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Ganguly P and Ganguly N: Transcriptomic analyses of genes differentially expressed by high-risk and low-risk human papilloma virus E6 oncoproteins. Virusdisease. 26:105–116. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Zhang G, Zhang W, Li B, Stringer-Reasor E, Chu C, Sun L, Bae S, Chen D, Wei S, Jiao K, et al: MicroRNA-200c and microRNA- 141 are regulated by a FOXP3-KAT2B axis and associated with tumor metastasis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 19:732017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2019
Volume 17 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Cheng L, Shi G, Fang C, Li G, Zheng Y and Chen W: Identifying the differentially expressed microRNAs in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh patients in Xinjiang. Oncol Lett 17: 2657-2668, 2019
APA
Cheng, L., Shi, G., Fang, C., Li, G., Zheng, Y., & Chen, W. (2019). Identifying the differentially expressed microRNAs in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh patients in Xinjiang. Oncology Letters, 17, 2657-2668. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.9904
MLA
Cheng, L., Shi, G., Fang, C., Li, G., Zheng, Y., Chen, W."Identifying the differentially expressed microRNAs in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh patients in Xinjiang". Oncology Letters 17.3 (2019): 2657-2668.
Chicago
Cheng, L., Shi, G., Fang, C., Li, G., Zheng, Y., Chen, W."Identifying the differentially expressed microRNAs in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma of Kazakh patients in Xinjiang". Oncology Letters 17, no. 3 (2019): 2657-2668. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.9904