Skip to main content
Log in

One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by the preferences expressed by other people via their gaze direction, so that objects looked at are liked more than objects looked away from. But when can others’ preferences be trusted? Here, we show that group size influences the extent to which individuals tend to conform to others’ gaze preferences. We adopted the conventional gaze-cuing paradigm and modified the design in such a way that some objects were consistently cued by only one face (single-face condition), whereas other objects were consistently cued by several different faces (multiple-faces condition). While response time measures revealed equal gaze-cuing effects for both conditions, a boost in affective evaluation was observed only for objects looked at by several different faces. Objects looked at by a single face were not rated differently than objects looked away from. These findings suggest that observers make use of group size to evaluate the generalizability of the epistemic information conveyed by others’ gaze: Objects looked at are liked more than objects looked away from, but only when they are looked at by multiple faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Campbell, R., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., & Walker, J. (1995). Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104, 644–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cueing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bry, C., Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2011). Eye’m lovin’ it! The role of gazing awareness in mimetic desires. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 987–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2010). How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects. Current Biology, 20, 1165–1170.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1992). Self as an epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724.

  • Frischen, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 516–533.

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17, R724–R732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. L. (2006). A nonconformist account of the Asch experiments: Values, pragmatics, and moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 2–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Rowe, A., & Leonards, U. (2011). I trust you; hence I like the things you look at: Gaze cueing and sender trustworthiness influence object evaluation. Social Cognition, 29(4), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for Closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Bar, R., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 345–390). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

  • Manera, V., Elena, M. R., Bayliss, A. P., & Becchio, C. (2014). When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. Emotion, 14(14), 824–832. doi:10.1037/a0036258.

  • Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Schieir, C. (2003). Gaze bias reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Luypaert, G. (2012). L-eye to me: The combined role of Need for Cognition and facial trustworthiness in mimetic desires. Cognition, 122, 247–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion, 10(6), 939–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 312919 to CB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Becchio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A.P., Elena, M.R. et al. One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 850–855 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z

Keywords

Navigation