Abstract
We examined the possible relevance of locus equations to human production and perception of stop consonants. The orderly output constraint (OOC) of Sussman, Frachter, and Cable (1995) claims that humans have evolved to produce speech such thatF2 at consonant release andF2 at vowel midpoint are linearly related for consonants so that developing perceptual systems can form representations in anF2 ons-by-F2 vowel space. The theory claims that this relationship described by locus equations can distinguish consonants, and that the linearity of locus equations is captured in neural representations and is thus perceptually relevant. We investigated these claims by testing how closely locus equations reflect the production and perception of stop consonants. In Experiment 1, we induced speakers to change their locus equation slope and intercept parameters systematically, but found that consonants remained distinctive in slope-by-intercept space. In Experiment 2, we presented stop-consonant syllables with their bursts removed to listeners, and compared their classification error matrices with the predictions of a model using locus equation prototypes and with those of an exemplar-based model that usesF2 ons andF2 vowel, but not locus equations. Both models failed to account for a large proportion of the variance in listeners’ responses; the locus equation model was no better in its predictions than the exemplar model. These findings are discussed in the context of the OOC.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amerman, J. D. (1970).A cinefluorographic investigation of the coarticulatory behavior of the apex and body lingual articulators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Bakran, J., &Mildner, V. (1995). Effect of speech rate and coarticulation strategies on the locus equation determination. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.),Proceedings of the XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 26–29). Stockholm: K.TH and Stockholm University.
Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: A window on early phonological development. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.),Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 289–304). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.),Cross-language speech perception (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.
Bladon, R. A. W., &Al-Bamerni, A. (1976). Coarticulation resistance in English /l/.Journal of Phonetics,4, 137–150.
Brancazio, L., &Mitra, J. (1994). A reconsideration of locus equations as invariants for place of articulation of stop consonants [Abstract].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,95, 2923.
Browman, C. P., &Goldstein, L. (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.),Papers in laboratory phonology I (pp. 341–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carré, R., &Mrayati, M. (1990). Articulatory-acoustic-phonetic relations and modelling, regions, and modes. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchai (Eds.),Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 211–240). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chennoukh, S., Carré, R., &Lindblom, B. (1995). On the “locus equation” and its relation with the consonant place of articulation [Abstract].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 3242.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
Crowther, C. S. (1994). Modelling coarticulation and place of articulation using locus equations.UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics,88, 127–148.
Delattre, P. C, Liberman, A. M., &Cooper, F. S. (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,27, 769–773.
Disner, S. F. (1980). Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,67, 253–261.
Dorman, M. F., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Raphael, L. J. (1977). Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 109–122.
Duez, D. (1992). Second-formant locus patterns: An investigation of spontaneous French speech.Speech Communication,11, 417–427.
Eek, A., &Meister, E. (1995). The perception of stop consonants: Locus equations and spectral integration. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.),Proceedings of the XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 18–21). Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University.
Engstrand, O. (1988). Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,83, 1863–1875.
Fant, G. (1973). Stops in CV-syllables. In G. Fant (Ed.),Speech sounds and features (pp. 110–139). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farnetani, E. (1990). V-C-V lingual coarticulation and its spatiotemporal domain. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchai (Eds.),Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 93–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fowler, C. A. (1984). Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 359–368.
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective.Journal of Phonetics,14, 3–28.
Fowler, C. A. (1994). Invariants, specifiers, cues: An investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 597–610.
Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,99, 1730–1741.
Fowler, C. A., &Brown, J. M. (1997). Intrinsic f0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 729–738.
Fruchter, D. (1994). Perceptual significance of locus equations [Abstract].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,95, 2977.
Fruchter, D., &Sussman, H. M. (1997). The perceptual relevance of locus equations.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,102, 2997–3008.
Grieser, D., &Kuhl, P. K. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes.Developmental Psychology,25, 577–588.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Kewley-Port, D. (1982). Measurements of formant transitions in naturally produced stop consonant-vowel syllables.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,72, 379–389.
Klatt, D. H. (1987). Review of text-to-speech conversion for English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,82, 737–793.
Krull, D. (1989). Consonant-vowel coarticulation in spontaneous speech and reference words.PERIL US,10, 101–105.
Krull, D. (1990). Relating acoustic properties to perceptual responses: A study of Swedish voiced stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 2557–2570.
Kuhn, G. M. (1975). On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,58, 428–433.
Kuhn, G. M. (1979). Stop consonant place perception with single-formant stimuli: Evidence for the role of the front-cavity resonance.Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica,65, 774–788.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review,74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C, Cooper, F. S., &Gerstman, L. J. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants.Psychological Monographs,68 (Whole No. 69), 1–13.
Liberman, A. M., &Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised.Cognition,21, 1–36.
Lindblom, B. E. (1963).On vowel reduction (Report No. 29). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Speech Transmission Laboratory.
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchai (Eds.),Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403–440). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Imassaro, D. W. (1987).Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nearey, T., &Shammass, S. (1987). Formant transitions as partly distinctive invariant properties in the identification of voiced stops.Canadian Acoustics,15, 17–24.
Ohde, R. N. (1988). Revisiting stop-consonant perception for two-formant stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,84, 1551–1555.
Öhman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,39, 151–168.
Olsen, J. F., &Suga, N. (1991). Combination-sensitive neurons in the imedial geniculate body of the mustached bat: Encoding of relative velocity information.Journal of Neurophysiology,65, 1254–1274.
Pinker, S., &Bloom, P. (1994). Authors’ response: Humans did not evolve from bats.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 183–184.
Pols, L. C. W., &Schouten, M. E. H. (1978). Identification of deleted consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,64, 1333–1337.
Recasens, D. (1985). Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in Catalan CV sequences.Language & Speech,28, 97–114.
Recasens, D. (1991). An electropalatographic and acoustic study of consonant-to-vowel coarticulation.Journal of Phonetics,19, 177–192.
Shaw, R. E., &Bransford, J. (1977). Introduction: Psychological approaches to the problem of knowledge. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shaw, R. E., &Turvey, M. T. (1981). Coalitions as models for ecosystems: A realist perspective on perceptual organization. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 343–416). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stevens, K. N., &Blumstein, S. E. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In P. D. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.),Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 1–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Suga, N., O’Neill, W. E., Kujirai, K., &Manabe, T. (1983). Specificity of combination sensitive neurons for processing of complex bisonar signals in auditory cortex of the mustached bat.Neurophysiology,49, 1573–1625.
Sussman, H. M. (1988). The neurogenesis of phonology. In H. A. Whitaker (Eds.),Phonological processes and brain mechanisms (pp. 1–23). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sussman, H. M. (1989). Neural coding of relational invariance in speech perception: Human language analogs to the barn owl.Psychological Review,96, 631–642.
Sussman, H. M. (1991). The representation of stop consonants in three-dimensional acoustic space.Phonetica,48, 18–31.
Sussman, H. M. (1994). The phonological reality of locus equations across manner class distinctions: Preliminary observations.Phonetica,51, 119–131.
Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., &Cable, A. (1995). Locus equations derived from compensatory articulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 3112–3124.
Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., Hilbert, J., & Sirosh, J. (in press). The orderly output constraint: A functional role for highly correlated, linearly related components in the speech signal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences.
Sussman, H. M., Hoemeke, K. A., &Ahmed, F. S. (1993). A Cross-linguistic investigation of locus equations as a phonetic descriptor for place of articulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,94, 1256–1268.
Sussman, H. M., Mccaffrey, H. A., &Matthews, S. A. (1991). An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,90, 1309–1325.
Sussman, H. M. & Shore, J. (1996). Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 936–946.
Wagner, H., Takahashi, T., &Konishi, M. (1987). Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl’s inferior colliculus.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 3105–3116.
Whalen, D. H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 284–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NICHD Grant HD-01994 to Haskins Laboratories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brancazio, L., Fowler, C.A. On the relevance of locus equations for production and perception of stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 24–50 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211916
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211916