Abstract
There are many conditions in which identification proceeds faster for the global form of a hierarchical pattern than for its local parts. Since the global form usually contains more lower spatial frequencies than do the local forms, it has frequently been suggested that the higher transmission rate of low spatial frequencies is responsible for the global advantage. There are also functional hemispheric differences. While the right hemisphere is better at processing global information, the left hemisphere has an advantage with respect to local information. In accordance with the spatial-frequency hypothesis, it has been speculated that this difference is due to a differential capacity of the hemispheres for processing low and high spatial frequencies. To test whether low spatial frequencies were responsible for the global advantage and/or for the observed hemispheric differences, two experiments were carried out with unfiltered and highpass-filtered compound-letter stimuli presented at the left, right, or center visual field. The first experiment, in which the target level was randomized in each trial block, revealed that low spatial frequencies were not necessary for either global advantage or for hemispheric differences. Highpass filtering merely increased the response times. In the second experiment, the target level was held constant in each block. This generally increased the speed of responding and produced interactions between filtering and global-local processing. It was concluded that both sensory and attentional or control mechanisms were responsible for global precedence and that the hemispheres differed with respect to the latter.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alivisatos, B., &Wilding, J. (1982). Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.Cortex,18, 5–22.
Allport, A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Badcock, J. C., Whitworth, F. A., Badcock, D. R., &Lovegrove, W. J. (1990). Low-frequency filtering and the processing of localglobal stimuli.Perception,19, 617–629.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Boer, L. C., &Keuss, P. J. G. (1982). Global precedence as a post-perceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 358–366.
Boles, D. B. (1984). Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy?Neuropsychologia,22, 445–455.
Boles, D. B., &Karner, T. A. (1996). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing.Brain & Cognition,30, 232–243.
Bradshaw, J. L., &Nettleton, N. C. (1981). The nature of hemispheric specialization in man.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,4, 51–63.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1975). Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels.Vision Research,15, 1411–1412.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. (1977). Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels.Vision Research,17, 861–865.
Campbell, F. W., &Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.Journal of Physiology,197, 551–566.
DeValois, R. L., &DeValois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Felipe, A., Buades, M. J., &Artigas, J.M. (1993). Influence of the contrast sensitivity function on the reaction time.Vision Research,33, 2461–2466.
Graham, N. (1989).Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoffman, J. E. (1980). Interaction between global and local levels of a form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 222–234.
Hübner, R. (1993). Different ways of modeling spatial-frequency uncertainty in visual signal detection.Biological Cybernetics,69, 457–462.
Hübner, R. (1996). The efficiency of different cue types for reducing spatial-frequency uncertainty.Vision Research,36, 401–408.
Hughes, H. C. (1986). Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 241–250.
Hughes, H. C., Fendrich, R., &Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1990). Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2, 272–282.
Humphreys, B. W., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1985). Interactive processes in perceptual organization: Evidence from visual agnosia. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention & performance XI (pp. 301–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Julesz, B., &Papathomas, T. V. (1984). On spatial-frequency channels and attention.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 398–399.
Kinchla, R. A. (1974). Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 149–158.
Kinchla, R. A., Solis-Macias, V., &Hoffman, J. (1983). Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 1–10.
Kinchla, R. A., &Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”Perception & Psychophysics,25, 225–231.
Kitterle, F. L., Christman, S., &Conesa, J. (1993). Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 785–793.
LaGasse, L. L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 89–105.
Lamb, M. R., &Robertson, L. C. (1988). The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 172–181.
Lamb, M. R., &Robertson, L. C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information?Perception & Psychophysics,46, 254–258.
Lamb, M. R., Robertson, L. C., &Knight, R. T. (1989). Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions.Neuropsychologia,27, 471–483.
Lamb, M. R., &Yund, E. W. (1993). The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 773–784.
Lovegrove, W. J., Lehmkuhle, S., Baro, J. A., &Garzia, R. (1991). The effects of uniform field flicker and blurring on the global precedence effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 289–291.
Lupp, U., Hauske, G., &Wolf, W. (1976). Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings.Vision Research,16, 969–972.
Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity.Memory & Cognition,7, 476–484.
Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1161–1174.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383.
Norman, D. A. (1969).Memory and attention. New York: Wiley.
Peterzell, D. H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., &Hardyck, C. D. (1989). Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: Contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 443–455.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 516–540.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Robertson, L. C., &Lamb, M. R. (1991). Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization.Cognitive Psychology,23, 299–330.
Robertson, L. C., Lamb, M. R., &Zaidel, E. (1993). Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commisurotomized subjects.Neuropsychology,7, 325–342.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1970). A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,7, 191–218.
Sergent, J. (1982). The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 253–272.
Sergent, J. (1987). Failures to confirm the spatial-frequency hypothesis: Fatal blow or healthy complication?Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 412–428.
Shulman, G. L., Sullivan, M. A., Gish, K., &Sakoda, W. J. (1986). The role of spatial-frequency channels in the perception of local and global structure.Perception,15, 259–273.
Stoffer, T. (1994). Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset.Psychological Research,56, 83–98.
Strayer, D. L., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 342–365.
Todd, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 198–210.
Todd, S., &Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a sustained-transient dichotomy for the measurement of human performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 625–638.
Tolhurst, D. J. (1975). Reaction times in the detection of gratings by human observers: A probabilistic mechanism.Vision Research,15, 1143–1149.
Van Kleeck, M. H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies.Neuropsychologia,27, 1165–1178.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 562–581.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminance visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Zaidel, E., &Rayman, J. (1994). Interhemispheric control in the normal brain: Evidence from redundant bilateral presentations. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV (pp. 476–504). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hübner, R. The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 187–201 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211888
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211888