Abstract
Smith (1979) reported an experiment in which subjects were to detect whether or not a displayed word contained a particular target letter. Her data indicated that if the word bearing the target letter was preceded by a semantically related item, the detection of the target letter was faster than it was if the preceding item was unrelated. Those results provided strong support for holistic models of word recognition, in which it is assumed that letter detection must be mediated by prior word recognition. That is, any facilitating effect of the prime on lexical access should be passed on to subsequent letter detection. The present experimental paradigm, which was very similar to (albeit different from) that of Smith, served to explore the generality of her effect, but the results did not confirm her findings. Although a lexical-decision task used in Experiments 2, 5, and 7 provided clear evidence that the priming items employed in these experiments did facilitate lexical processing, a letter-detection task used in Experiments 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 failed to reveal any facilitating effect of semantic priming on letter detection. The conclusion is that the generality of Smith’s effect is far too limited to offer support for holistic models-of word recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1990). Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 231–237.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Part 2).
Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606.
Healy, A. F., &Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in misspelled words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 413–426.
Johnson, N. F. (1975). On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 17–29.
Johnson, N. F. (1977). A pattern-unit-model of word identification. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 91–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, N. F. (1979). The role of letters in word identification: A test of the pattern-unit model.Memory & Cognition,7, 496–504.
Johnson, N. F. (1981). Integration processes in word identification. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 29–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, N. F., Allen, P. A., &Strand, T. L. (1989). On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.Memory & Cognition,17, 474–482.
Johnson, N. F., &Blum, A. J. (1988). When redundancy hurts letter detection: An attempt to define one condition.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 147–155.
Johnson, N. F., Turner-Lyga, M., &Purner-Lyga, B. S. (1986). Part-whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns.Memory & Cognition,14, 5–16.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1980). Experimental tests ofa hierarchical model of word identification.Journal of Venial Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 503–524.
Kaye, D. B., &Brown, S. W. (1985). Levels and speed of processing effects on word analysis.Memory & Cognition,13, 425–434.
Marmurek, H. H. C. (1987). Attentional holism in visual word processing.Psychological Research,49, 45–52.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes.Memory & Cognition,4, 648–654.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Reicher, G. M. (1967). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness ofstimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280.
Schacter, D. L. (1992). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach.American Psychologist,47, 559–569.
Seidenberg, M. S., Walters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Smith, M. C. (1979). Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 239–251.
Smith, M. C., Theodor, L., &Franklin, P. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 697–712.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Process in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Experiments 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 in this study formed T.L.B.’s masters thesis, which was submitted to Ohio State University under the name of T. L. Strand.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blum, T.L., Johnson, N.F. The effect of semantic priming on the detection of letters within words. Mem Cogn 21, 389–396 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208272