Abstract
In mixed-modality psychophysical scaling, stimuli from different modalities are presented alternately for judgment on the same scale. This paper reports the results of two experiments using a variant of the standard technique that allowed investigation of inter- and intramodality sequential dependencies as a function of lag. Derived cross-modality matching functions from magnitude- and category-matching experiments were highly similar, with exponents around 1.6, as is the case for the standard technique. In both experiments, significant inter- and intramodality assimilation of responses to previous responses was found for lags of up to four trials back in the sequence of stimuli, whereas contrast of current responses to previous stimulus values occurred only within a modality, but also for lags of up to four trials. Second-order dependency of the correlation between current and previous responses as a function of the separation of their stimuli has the usual form (inverted v) for lags of up to four trials, both within and across modalities. Dependency of the coefficient of variation of the ratio of current to previous responses on the separation of their stimuli was found only within a stimulus modality, and only for a lag of one trial. These results strengthen the case for different sources for assimilative and contrastive sequential dependencies, and for the two second-order dependencies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, J C., Green, D. M., &Luce, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 277–289.
Green, D. M., Luce, R. D. (1974). Variability of magnitude estimates: A timing theory analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 291–300.
Jesteadt, W., Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,3, 92–104.
King, M. C., &Lockhead, G. R. (1981). On memory effects in magnitude estimation experiments.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 599–603.
Lockhead, G. R., &King, M. C. (1983). A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,9, 461–473.
Marks, L. E. (1974). On scales of sensation’ Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 358–376.
Staddon, J. E. R., King, M. C., &Lockhead, G. R. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 290–301.
Stevens, J. C., &Marks, L. E. (1980). Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 379–389.
Treisman, M., &Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies.Psychological Review,91, 68–111.
Ward, L. M. (1971). Some psychophysical properties of category judgments and magnitude estimations.Dissertation Abstracts International,32, 1887B. (University Microfilms No 71-24, 212).
Ward, L. M. (1974). Power functions for category judgments of duration and line length.Perceptual & Motor Skills,38, 1182.
Ward, L. M. (1979). Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,5, 444–459.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 53–62.
Ward, L. M., &Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 73–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant A9958 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ward, L.M. Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Inter- and intramodality sequential dependencies as a function of lag. Perception & Psychophysics 38, 512–522 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207060
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207060