Abstract
We explore how listeners perceive distinct pieces of phonetic information that are conveyed in parallel by the fundamental frequency (f0) contour of spoken and sung vowels. In a first experiment, we measured differences inf0 of /i/ and /a/ vowels spoken and sung by unselected undergraduate participants. Differences in “intrinsicf0” (withf0 of /i/ higher than of /a/) were present in spoken and sung vowels; however, differences in sung vowels were smaller than those in spoken vowels. Four experiments tested a hypothesis that listeners would not hear the intrinsicf0 differences as differences in pitch on the vowel, because they provide information, instead, for production of a closed or open vowel. The experiments provide clear evidence of “parsing” of intrinsicf0 from thef0 that contributes to perceived vowel pitch. However, only some conditions led to an estimate of the magnitude of parsing that closely matched the magnitude of produced intrinsicf0 differences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Best, C. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. Goodman & H. Nusbaum (Eds.),The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diehl, R. (1991).The role of phonetics within the study of language.Phonetica,48, 120–134.
Dhyr, N. (1990). The activity of the cricothyroid muscle and the intrinsic fundamental frequency in Danish vowels.Phonetica,47, 141–154.
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1990). Intrinsicf 0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German.Phonetica,47, 99–140.
Fowler, C. A. (1981). Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,46, 127–139.
Fowler, C. A. (1984). Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 359–368.
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective.Journal of Phonetics,14, 3–28.
Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,99, 1730–1741.
Fowler, C. A., &Smith, M. (1986). Speech perception as “vector analysis”: An approach to the problems of segmentation and invariance. In J. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.),Invariance and variability of speech processes (pp. 123–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grieffenberg, M., &Reinholt-Petersen, N. (1982).The effect of high and low vowels on the fundamental frequency in singing: Some preliminary observations (Annual Report). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Institute of Phonetics.
Hombert, J. M. (1978). Consonant types, vowel quality and tone. In V. Fromkin (Ed.),Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 77–112). New York: Academic Press.
Honda, K. (1981). Relationship between pitch control and vowel articulation. In D. Bless & J. Abbs (Eds.),Vocal-fold physiology (pp. 286–297). San Diego: College-Hill.
Honda, K., &Fujimura, O. (1991). Intrinsic vowelf0 and phrasefinalf0 lowering: Phonological versus biological explanations. In J. Gauffin & B. Hammarberg (Eds.),Vocal fold physiology: Acoustic perceptual and physiological aspects of voice mechanisms (pp. 149–157). San Diego: Singular.
Kluender, K. (1994). Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 173–217). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ladd, D. R., &Silverman, K. E. A. (1984). Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech.Phonetica,41, 31–40.
Liberman, A., &Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory revised.Cognition,21, 1–36.
Martin, J., &Bunnell, H. T. (1981). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 559–567.
Ohala, J., &Eukel, B. (1976).Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels (Working paper). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Phonology Laboratory.
Ohala, J., &Eukel, B. (1987). Explaining intrinsic pitch of vowels. In R. Channon & L. Shockey (Eds.), Inhonor of Ilse Lehiste (pp. 207–215). Dordrecht: Foris.
Pardo, J., & Fowler, C. A. (in press). Perceiving the causes of coarticulatory acoustic variation.Perception & Psychophysics.
Reinholt-Peterson, N. (1986). Perceptual compensation for segmentallyconditioned fundamental-frequency perturbations.Phonetica,43, 31–42.
Sapir, S. (1989). The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological and clinical observations.Journal of Voice,3, 44–51.
Silverman, K. (1987).The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cambridge University.
Ternström, S., Sundberg, J., &Colldén, A. (1988). Articulatoryf0 perturbations and auditory feedback.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,31, 187–192.
Vilkman, E., Aaltonen, O., Laine, U., &Raimo, I. (1991). Intrinsic pitch of vowels-A complicated problem with an obvious solution? In J. Gauffin & B. Hammarberg (Eds.),Vocal fold physiology: Acoustic perceptual and physiological aspects of voice mechanisms (pp. 159–166). San Diego: Singular.
Vilkman, E., Aaltonen, O., Raimo, I., Arajärvi, P., &Oksanen, H. (1989). Articulatory hyoid-laryngeal changes vs. cricothyroid activity in the control off0 of vowels.Journal of Phonetics,17, 193–203.
Whalen, D. H. (1984). Subcategorical mismatches slow phonetic judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 49–64.
Whalen, D. H., &Levitt, A. (1995). The universality of intrinsicf0 of vowels.Journal of Phonetics,23, 349–366.
Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A., Hsaio, P., &Smorodinsky, I. (1995). Intrinsicf0 of vowels in the babbling of 6-, 9-, and 12-month old French- and English-learning infants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 2533–2539.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NICHD Grant HD-01994 to Haskins Laboratories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowler, C.A., Brown, J.M. Intrinsicf0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 729–738 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206019
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206019