Abstract
The size-distance invariance hypothesis (SDIH) was examined for remembered and imaged stimuli. In Experiment 1, subjects gave remembered and imaged distances of familiar objects and imaged distance of nondescript rods. The relationship between stated size and distance is more adequately described by power functions with exponents less than I than by the more restricted SDIH (exponent of 1). In Experiment 2, subjects gave distance estimates to recalled and imaged familiar objects and described the visual context in which each object was situated. A different group then sorted the contexts into categories based on general similarity. There were no significant differences between distance estimates based on memory and those based on imagery, and the visual contexts were not sorted according to whether they were generated in the memory or in the imagery conditions. In Experiment 3, subjects estimated the distances to objects in an outdoor setting. A linear relationship was found between estimated and physical distance, suggesting that the lower exponents obtained in Experiments 1 and 2 were not artifacts of the distance judgment procedure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review,85, 249–277.
Baird, J. C. (1963). Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology,66, 155–162.
Baird, J. C. (1970).Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon Press.
Baird, J. C., Green, D. M., &Luce, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 277–289.
Baird, J. C., Merrill, A. A., &Tannenbaum, J. (1979). Cognitive representation of spatial relations: II. A fanuliar environment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,l08, 92–98.
Baird, J. C., &Noma, E. (1978).Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Coltheart, M. (1969a). Effects of two kinds of distance information on visual judgments of absolute size.Nature,221, 338.
Coltheart, M. (1969b). The influence of haptic size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 143–144.
Coltheart, M. (1970). The effect of verbal size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 222–223.
Da Silva, J. A. (1985). Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: Comparison of three psychophysical methods.American Journal of Psychology,98, 119–144.
Epstein, W., Park, J., &Casey, A. (1961). The current status of the size-distance invariance hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin,58, 491–514.
Farah, M. (1985). Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 91–103.
Finke, R. A., &Shepard, R. N. (1986). Visual functions of mental imagery. In K. R. Buff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 37.1–37.55). New York: Wiley.
Fitzpatrick, V., Pasnak, R., &Tyer, Z. (1982). The effect of familiar size at familiar distances.Perception,11, 85–91.
Hastorf, A. H. (1950). The influence of suggestion on the relationship between stimulus size and perceived distance.Journal of Psychology,29, 195–217.
Hubbard, T. L., &Baird, J. C. (1988). Overflow, first-sight, and vanishing point distances in visual imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 641–649.
Ittelson, I. H. (1951). Size as a cue to distance: Static localization.American Journal of Psychology,64, 54–67.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1978). Measuring the visual angle of the mind's eye.Cognitive Psychology,10, 356–389.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., &Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin,102, 28–41.
Ono, H. (1969). Apparent distance as a function of apparent size.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 109–115.
Park, J. N., &Michaelson, G. J. (1974). Distance judgments under different size-information conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 57–60.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review,87, 16–45.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Buff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. 1: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21.1–21.57). New York: Wiley.
Segal, S. J., &Fusella, V. (1970). Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 458–464.
Shepard, R. N., &Podgorny, P. (1978). Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5, pp. 189–237). New York: Halsted Press.
Sherman, R. C., Croxton, J., &Giovanatto, J. (1979). Investigating cognitive representations of spatial relationships.Environment & Behavior,11, 209–216.
Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 483–495.
Weber, R. J., &Malmstrom, F. V. (1979). Measuring the size of mental images.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 1–12.
Wiest, W. M., &Bell, B. (1985). Steven's exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance.Psychological Bulletin,98, 457–470.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubbard, T.L., Kall, D. & Baird, J.C. Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance. Memory & Cognition 17, 87–94 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199560
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199560