Abstract
The sensitivity of the tactile sense to shifts in the position of a point stimulus was determined at four body loci: the index finger, forehead, belly, and back. Water-jet stimulation was used, a method which allows frictionless travel of a point stimulus over the skin. Three subjects were tested by means of the method of forced choice, with the task being to say whether the stimulus moved to the right or to the left. The shift threshold was defined as that shift excursion which gave rise to 75% correct responding. The basic finding was that shift thresholds were on the order of 10 to 30 times smaller than the corresponding two-point limens obtained by Weinstein (1968) for the same body loci. These unexpectedly small shift thresholds indicate an exquisite sensitivity of the cutaneous sense to rapid changes in position of a point stimulus. A physiological model is presented which accounts for the difference between localization and spatial resolution. nt]mis|This research was supported by Department of Health~ Education, and Welfare Grant 14-P-SS282/9 from the Social and Rehabilitation Services, NIH Research Grant R01-EY-00686 from the National Eye Institute, and the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Foundation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References Notes
Collins, C. C., & Madey, J. M. J.Tactile sensory replacement. Proceedings of the San Diego Biomedical Symposium, 1974.
References
Apkarian-Stielau, P., &Loomis, J. M. A comparison of tactile and blurred visual form perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 362–368.
Berry, R. N. Quantitative relations among vernier, real depth, and stereoscopic depth acuities.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948,38, 708–721.
Boring, E. G. The stimulus-error.American Journal of Psychology, 1921.32, 449–471.
Boring, E G. The two-point limen and the error of localization.American Journal of Psychology, 1930,42, 446–449.
Boring, E. G.Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 1942.
Disher, D. R. The effect of pressure magnitude on cutaneous localization.Journal of General Psychology, 1933,9. 390–404.
Hecht, E.. &Zaiac, A.Opties. Reading. Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1976.
Hoagland, H. A basis for cutaneous localization.Journal qt General Psychology, 1932,6, 468–470.
Johansson, R. Skin mechanoreceptors in the human hand: Receptive field characteristics. In Y Zotterman (Ed.),Sensory functions of the skin in primates. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.
Johansson, R., &Vallbo, A. B. Skin mechanoreceptors in the human hand: An inference of some population properties. In Y. Zotterman (Ed.),Sensory functions of the skin in primates. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.
Loomis, J. M. Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 401–408.
Ludvigh, E. Direction sense of the eye.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1953,36, 139–143.
Pritchard, E. A. B. Cutaneous tactile localization.Brain, 1931,54, 350–371.
Rivers, W. H. R., &Head, H. A human experiment in nerve division.Brain, 1908,31, 323–450.
Sinclair, D.Cutaneous sensation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.
Vierck, C. J., Jr., &Jones, M. B. Size discrimination on the skin.Science, 1969,63, 488–489.
vonBékésy, G.Sensory inhibition. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1967.
Weinstein, S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses. Springfield, Ill: Thomas, 1968.
Werner, G., &Whitsel, B. L. Functional organization of the somatosensory cortex. In A. Iggo (Ed.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. II)Somatosensory system. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1973.
Westheimer, G. Visual acuity and spatial modulation thresholds. In D. Jameson & L. M. Hurvich (Eds.),Handbook of sensory phystology (Vol. 7/4)Visual psychophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1972.
Westheimer, G. Spatial frequency and light-spread descriptions of visual acuity and hyperacuity.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1977,67, 207–212.
Westheimer, G.. &McKee.S. Integration regions for visual hyperacuity.Vision Research, 1977,17, 89–93. (a)
Westheimer, G., &McKee, S. Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity.Vision Research, 1977.17, 941–947. (b)
Zigier, M. J. The experimental relation o1 the two-point limen to the error of localization.Journal of General Psychology, 1935,13. 316–331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loomis, J.M., Collins, C.C. Sensitivity to shifts of a point stimulus: An instance of tactile hyperacuity. Perception & Psychophysics 24, 487–492 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198771
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198771