Abstract
Lexical decision to a target is typically facilitated when a related prime is simply read, but is typically eliminated if subjects carry out a letter search on the prime when probe and prime appear simultaneously. Three experiments involving the addition of a task-irrelevant word to this prime search paradigm address (1) Stolz and Besner’s (1996, 1998) account in which semantic priming is eliminated because letter search on the prime instantiates an activation block between lexical and semantic levels of representation, (2) Chiappe, Smith, and Besner’s (1996) account that activation blocking is domain specific, and (3) Neely and Kahan’s (2001) claim that semantic activation is context independent and capacity free. The results are (1) consistent with the account that activation blocking is general to a level, rather than item specific, (2) consistent with the account that activation blocking is domain specific, and (3) inconsistentwith the claim that semantic activation is context independent and capacity free.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1980). Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,21, 93–123.
Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 468–482.
Besner, D., &Stolz, J. A. (1999). Unconsciously contextually controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 449–455.
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.
Borowsky, R., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 272–276.
Chiappe, P. R., Smith, M. C., &Besner, D. (1996). Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 249–253.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friedrich, F. J., Henik, A., &Tzelgov, J. (1991). Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.Journal of Expermiental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 792–806.
Henderson, L. (1987). Word recognition: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 171–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., &Kellogg, W. A. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.Memory & Cognition,11, 366–373.
Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., Tzelgov, J., &Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming.Memory & Cognition,22, 157–168.
Johnston, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception: Clues from studying the word superiority effect. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 65–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Logan, G. D., &Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1072–1090.
MacLeod, C. (2000, July).Putting automaticity in context: Reducing the Stroop effect. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Experimental Psychological Society and the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour & Cognitive Science, Cambridge, U.K.
Marí-Beffa, P., Fuentes, L. J., Catena, A., &Houghton, G. (2000). Semantic priming in the prime task effect: Evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.Memory & Cognition,28, 635–647.
McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., &Kahan, T. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A.M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., MacDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Schneider, W. (1990).MEL user’s guide: Computer techniques for real time experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Smith, M. C., &Besner, D. (2001). Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 111–117.
Smith, M. C., Besner, D., &Miyoshi, H. (1994). New limits to automaticity: Context modulated semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 104–115.
Smith, M. C., Theodor, L., &Franklin, P. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 697–712.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1996). The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as non-automatic processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1166–1177.
Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between semantic and morphological processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1642–1655.
Stolz, J. A., Robidoux, S., & Besner, D. (2000).Semantic priming in the context of an interactive activation framework: Explorations in connectionist modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Taft, M. (1991).Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSERC Grant AO998 to D.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, M.S., Roberts, M.A. & Besner, D. Semantic processing in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domain specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 778–784 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196217
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196217