Abstract
In this study, we examined the orientation dependency of spatial representations following various learning conditions. We assessed the spatial representations of human participants after they had learned a complex spatial layout via map learning, via navigating within a real environment, or via navigating through a virtual simulation of that environment. Performances were compared between conditions involving (1) multiple- versus single-body orientation, (2) active versus passive learning, and (3) high versus low levels of proprioceptive information. Following learning, the participants were required to produce directional judgments to target landmarks. Results showed that the participants developed orientation-specific spatial representations following map learning and passive learning, as indicated by better performance when tested from the initial learning orientation. These results suggest that neither the number of vantage points nor the level of proprioceptive information experienced are determining factors; rather, it is theactive aspect of direct navigation that leads to the development of orientation-free representations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, E. J., &Hancock, P. A. (2001). Navigation training in virtual environments.International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics,5, 387–400.
Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., &Passenier, P. O. (1999). The effects of proprioceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,8, 36–53.
Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., &Passenier, P. O. (2001). Calibrating visual path integration in VEs.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,10, 216–224.
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., &Loomis, J.M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of landmarks encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,7, 168–178.
Easton, R. D., &Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 483–500.
Eichenbaum, H., &Cohen, N. J. (2001).From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, G.W., &Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 13–24.
Farrell, M. J., &Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 227–233.
Farrell, M. J., &Thomson, J. A. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 637–654.
Golledge, R. G. (1999).Wayfinding behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., &Tarr, M. J. (2002). Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task.Perception,31, 349–374.
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., &Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion.Psychological Science,9, 293–298.
Lathrop, W. B., &Kaiser, M. K. (2002). Perceived orientation in physical and virtual environments: Changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,11, 19–32.
Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., &Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 157–175.
Loomis, J.M., Blascovich, J. J., &Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 557–564.
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., &Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.),Wayfinding behavior(pp. 125–151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
May, M., Peruch, P., &Savoyant, A. (1995). Navigating in a virtual environment with map-acquired knowledge: Encoding and alignment effects.Ecological Psychology,7, 21–36.
Palij, M., Levine, M., &Kahan, T. (1984). The orientation of cognitive maps.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 105–108.
Peruch, P., &Lapin, E. A. (1993). Route knowledge in different spatial frames of reference.Acta Psychologica,84, 253–269.
Presson, C. C., DeLange, N., &Hazelrigg, M. D. (1987). Orientationspecificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: The role of multiple orientations.Memory & Cognition,15, 225–229.
Presson, C. C., DeLange, N., &Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 887–897.
Presson, C. C., &Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 716–722.
Presson, C. C., &Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space.Perception,23, 1447–1455.
Presson, C. C., &Somerville, S. C. (1985). Beyond egocentrism: A new look at the beginnings of spatial representation. In H.M. Wellman (Ed.),Children’s searching: The development of search skill and spatial representation (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., &Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments.Memory & Cognition,27, 741–750.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1157–1165.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., &Carr,W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 215–226.
Rossano, M. J., &Moak, J. (1998). Spatial representations acquired from computer models: Cognitive load, orientation-specificity and the acquisition of survey knowledge.British Journal of Psychology,89, 481–497.
Rossano, M. J., &Warren, D. H. (1989). Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors.Perception,18, 215–229.
Rossano, M. J., West, S. O., Robertson, T. J., Wayne, M. C., &Chase, R. B. (1999). The acquisition of route and survey knowledge from computer models.Journal of Environmental Psychology,19, 101–115.
Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 615–628.
Sholl, M. J., &Bartels, G. P. (2002). The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 422–436.
Sholl, M. J., &Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1494–1507.
Siegel, A.W. (1981). The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In L. S. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.),Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application (pp. 167–194). New York: Academic Press.
Simons, D. J., &Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes.Psychological Science,9, 315–320.
Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L., &Chan, G. S. W. (2004). Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.Experimental Brain Research,154, 246–254.
Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L., Chan, G. S. W. Young, M., &Ellard, C. (2004). The contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues, and optic flow in distance estimation.Perception,33, 49–65.
Thorndyke, P. W., &Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.Cognitive Psychology,14, 560–589.
Tlauka, M., &Wilson, P. N. (1996). Orientation-free representations from navigation through a computer-simulated environment.Environment & Behavior,28, 647–664.
Waller, D., Hunt, E., &Knapp, D. (1998). The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training.Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments,7, 129–143.
Warren, D. H., Rossano, M. J., &Wear, T. D. (1990). Perception of map environment correspondence: The roles of features and alignment.Ecological Psychology,2, 131–150.
Wilson, P. N. (1997). Use of virtual reality computing in spatial learning research. In N. Foreman & R. Gillett (Eds.),A handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies: Vol. 1. Spatial cognition in the child and adult (pp. 181–206). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wilson, P. N. (1999). Active exploration of a virtual environment does not promote orientation or memory for objects.Environment & Behavior,31, 752–763.
Wilson, P. N., Foreman, N., Gillett, R., &Stanton, D. (1997). Active versus passive processing of spatial information in a computersimulated environment.Ecological Psychology,9, 207–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and Ontario Innovation Trust to H-.J. S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, HJ., Chan, G.S.W. & Campos, J.L. Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations. Memory & Cognition 32, 51–71 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195820
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195820