Abstract
In efficient search for feature singleton targets, additional singletons (ASs) defined in a nontarget dimension are frequently found to interfere with performance. All search tasks that are processed via a spatial saliency map of the display would be predicted to be subject to such AS interference. In contrast, dual-route models, such as feature integration theory, assume that singletons are detected not via a saliency map, but via a nonspatial route that is immune to interference from cross-dimensional ASs. Consistent with this, a number of studies have reported absent interference effects in detection tasks. However, recent work suggests that the failure to find such effects may be due to the particular frequencies at which ASs were presented, as well as to their relative saliency. These two factors were examined in the present study. In contrast to previous reports, cross-dimensional ASs were found to slow detection (target-present and target-absent) responses, modulated by both their frequency of occurrence and saliency (relative to the target). These findings challenge dual-route models and support single-route models, such as dimension weighting and guided search.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.
Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 764–787. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.764
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. C. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
Bravo, M. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465–472.
Chan, L. K. H., & Hayward, W. G. (2009). Feature integration theory revisited: Dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 119–132. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119
Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI: Attention and neuropsychology (pp. 85–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–11. doi:10.1167/7.6.1
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. [W.] (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 847–858. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimensionweighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88–101.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.
Kumada, T. (1999). Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 61–79.
Lamy, D., Tsal, Y., & Egeth, H. E. (2003). Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 621–629.
Lamy, D., & Yashar, A. (2008). Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: Target uncertainty does. Vision Research, 48, 1274–1279. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021
Müller, H. J., Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Krummenacher, J. (2009). Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1–16. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1–17.
Proulx, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 524–529.
Proulx, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Biased competition and visual search: The role of luminance and size contrast. Psychological Research, 72, 106–113. doi:10.1007/s00426-006-0077-z
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J., & Hickey, C. (2008, November). A biased competition account of attentional capture. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Treisman, A. [M.] (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
Treisman, A. [M.], & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15
Treisman, A. [M.], & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459–478. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2004). Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception, 33, 927–937. doi:10.1068/p5158
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.
Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95–107. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.95
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the following grants: DFG Excellence Cluster Grant EC 142 “CoTeSys” to H.J.M. and M.Z.; and DFG Research Group Grant FOR480 to H.J.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zehetleitner, M., Proulx, M.J. & Müller, H.J. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: A common salience route for detection and compound tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 1760–1770 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1760
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1760