Abstract
We investigated the ability to perceive the metric shape of elliptical cylinders. A large number of previous studies have shown that small perspective variations (#10°) afforded by stereovision and by head movements fail to allow accurate perception of metric shape. If space perception is affine (Koenderink & van Doorn, 1991), observers are unable to compare or relate lengths in depth to frontoparallel lengths (i.e., widths). Frontoparallel lengths can be perceived correctly, whereas lengths in depth generally are not. We measured reaches to evaluate shape perception and investigated whether larger perspective variations would allow accurate perception of shape. In Experiment 1, we replicated previous results showing poor perception with small perspective variations. In Experiment 2, we found that a 90° continuous change in perspective, which swapped depth and width, allowed accurate perception of the depth/width aspect ratio. In Experiment 3, we found that discrete views differing by 90° were insufficient to allow accurate perception of metric shape and that perception of a continuous perspective change was required. In Experiment 4, we investigated continuous perspective changes of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° and discovered that a 45° change or greater allowed accurate perception of the aspect ratio and that less than this did not. In conclusion, we found that perception of metric shape is possible with continuous perspective transformations somewhat larger than those investigated in the substantial number of previous studies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bingham, G. P. (2005). Calibration of distance and size does not calibrate shape information: Comparison of dynamic monocular and static and dynamic binocular vision. Ecological Psychology, 17, 55–74.
Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1314–1344.
Bingham, G. P., Coats, R., & Mon-Williams, M. (2007). Unnatural prehension to virtual objects is not inevitable if calibration is allowed. Neuropsychologia, 45, 288–294.
Bingham, G. P., Crowell, J. A., & Todd, J. T. (2004). Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 152–169.
Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., & Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1436–1460.
Blair, N., Wickelgren, E., & Bingham, G. P. (2001, June). How representative is parallel projection of structure-from-motion? Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Perception and Action, Storrs, CT.
Börjesson, E., & Lind, M. (1996). The effect of polar projection on the perception of euclidean structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 871–882.
Bradshaw, M. F., & Elliot, K. M. (2003). The role of binocular information in the ‘on-line’ control of prehension. Spatial Vision, 16, 295–309.
Bradshaw, M. F., Elliot, K. M., Watt, S. J., Hibbard, P. B., Davies, I. R. L., & Simpson, P. J. (2004). Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spatial Vision, 17, 95–110.
Brenner, E., & van Damme, W. J. M. (1999). Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research, 39, 975–986.
Coats, R., Bingham, G. P., & Mon-Williams, M. (in press). Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: Interactions reveal integral organization in reaching-to-grasp movements. Experimental Brain Research.
Crowell, J. A., Todd, J. T., & Bingham, G. P. (2000, November). Distinct visuomotor transformations for visually guided reaching. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Crowell, J. A., Todd, J. T., & Bingham, G. P. (2001, May). Distinct perceptual representations for visually guided reaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Cuijpers, R. H., Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2004). On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 2598–2606.
Eagle, R. A., & Hogervorst, M. A. (1999). The role of perspective information in the recovery of 3D structure-from-motion. Vision Research, 39, 1713–1722.
Hibbard, P. B., & Bradshaw, M. F. (2003). Reaching for virtual objects: Binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 196–201.
Hogervorst, M. A., & Eagle, R. A. (2000). The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-frommotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 934–955.
Koenderink, J. J. (1990). Solid shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 377–385.
Lappin, J. S., & Ahlström, U. B. (1994). On the scaling of visual space from motion—in response to Pizlo and Salach-Golyska. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 235–242.
Lee, Y. -L., Crabtree, C. E., Norman, J. F., & Bingham, G. P. (2008). Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lind, M., Bingham, G. P., & Forsell, C. (2003). Metric 3D structure in visualizations. Information Visualization, 2, 51–57.
Loomis, J. M., Philbeck, J. W., & Zahorik, P. (2002). Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1202–1212.
Melmoth, D. R., & Grant, S. (2006). Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 371–388.
Mon-Williams, M., & Bingham, G. P. (2007). Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 645–656.
Mon-Williams, M., Coats, R., & Bingham, G. P. (2004). Reaching with feeling [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4, 411a.
Pagano, C. C., & Bingham, G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1037–1051.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., Lappin, J. S., & Phillips, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 377–388.
Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1996). The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 666–679.
Scarfe, P., & Hibbard, P. B. (2006). Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy. Vision Research, 46, 1599–1610.
Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 663–678.
Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419–430.
Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509–523.
Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of threedimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75–86.
Watt, S. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (2000). Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1473–1481.
Watt, S. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (2003). The visual control of reaching and grasping: Binocular disparity and motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 404–415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported in part by Grant R01 EY11741-01A3 from the National Eye Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bingham, G.P., Lind, M. Large continuous perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for accurate perception of metric shape. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 524–540 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.524
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.524