Abstract
Speakers frequently have specific intentions that they want others to recognize (Grice, 1957). These specific intentions can be viewed as speech acts (Searle, 1969), and I argue that they play a role in long-term memory for conversation utterances. Five experiments were conducted to examine this idea. Participants in all experiments read scenarios ending with either a target utterance that performed a specific speech act (brag, beg, etc.) or a carefully matched control. Participants were more likely to falsely recall and recognize speech act verbs after having read the speech act version than after having read the control version, and the speech act verbs served as better recall cues for the speech act utterances than for the controls. Experiment 5 documented individual differences in the encoding of speech act verbs. The results suggest that people recognize and retain the actions that people perform with their utterances and that this is one of the organizing principles of conversation memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B. P. (1982). Contextual integration and utterance interpretation: The ability of children and adults to interpret sarcastic utterances. Child Development, 53, 1075–1083.
Allen, J. (1983). Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. In M. Brady & R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Computational models of discourse (pp. 107–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.
Brewer, W. F. (1977). Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 5, 673–678.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
Cohen, P. R. & Levesque, H. J. (1990). Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 221–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, P. R. & Perrault, C. R. (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 177–212.
Dascal, M. (1987). Defending literal meaning. Cognitive Science, 11, 259–281.
Davis, D. & Friedman, R. D. (2005). Memory for conversation: The orphan child of witness memory researchers. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 3–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D. & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
Ferreira, F. & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 348–368.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2003). Nonliteral speech acts in text and discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 357–393). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 31–50.
Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248–271.
Holtgraves, T. (1997a). Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks. Memory & Cognition, 25, 106–116.
Holtgraves, T. (1997b). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73, 624–637.
Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 1–27.
Holtgraves, T. M. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holtgraves, T. (2005a). The production and perception of implicit performatives. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 2024–2043.
Holtgraves, T. (2005b). Diverging interpretations associated with the perspectives of the speaker and recipient in conversations. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 551–566.
Holtgraves, T. (2007). Second language learners and speech act comprehension. Language Learning, 57, 595–610.
Holtgraves, T. (in press). Automatic intention recognition in conversation processing. Journal of Memory & Language.
Holtgraves, T. & Ashley, A. (2001). Comprehending illocutionary force. Memory & Cognition, 29, 83–90.
Holtgraves, T., Srull, T. K. & Socall, D. (1989). Conversation memory: The effects of speaker status on memory for the assertiveness of conversation remarks. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 149–160.
Jarvella, R. J. & Collas, J. G. (1974). Memory for the intentions of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 2, 185–188.
Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B. & Mayhew, D. (1977). Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 549–560.
Kemper, S. (1980). Memory for the form and force of declaratives and interrogatives. Memory & Cognition, 8, 367–371.
Keysar, B. & Henley, A. S. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. Psychological Science, 13, 207–212.
Kintsch, W. & Bates, E. (1977). Recognition memory for sentences from a classroom lecture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 150–159.
Kitayama, S. & Burnstein, E. (1988). Automaticity in conversations: A reexamination of the mindlessness hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 219–224.
Klauer, K. C. & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the “Who said what?” paradigm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 1155–1178.
Langer, E. J., Blank, A. & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 635–642.
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.
Ley, P. (1979). Memory for medical information. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 18, 245–255.
MacWhinney, B., Keenan, J. & Reinke, R. (1982). The role of arousal in memory for conversation. Memory & Cognition, 10, 308–317.
Miller, J. B., deWinstanley, P. [A.], & Carey, P. (1996). Memory for conversation. Memory, 4, 615–631.
Murphy, G. L. & Shapiro, A. M. (1994). Forgetting of verbatim information in discourse. Memory & Cognition, 22, 85–94.
Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for the syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 437–442.
Sachs, J. S. (1974). Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory & Cognition, 2, 95–100.
Sanford, A. J. & Graesser, A. C. (2006). Shallow processing and underspecification. Discourse Processes, 42, 99–108.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schweller, K. G., Brewer, W. F. & Dahl, D. A. (1976). Memory for illocutionary forces and perlocutionary effects of utterances. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 325–337.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language, 17, 3–23.
Stone, M. (2005). Communicative intentions and conversational processes in human-human and human-computer dialogue. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 39–69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L. & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and speech acts: Vol. I. Principles of language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wanner, E. (1974). On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences: A study of the deep structure hypothesis. The Hague: Mouton.
Wish, M., D’Andrade, R. G. & Goodenough, J. E. (1980). Dimensions of interpersonal communication: Correspondences between structures for speech acts and bipolar scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 848–860.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wyer, R. S., Budesheim, T. L., Lambert, A. J. & Swan, S. (1994). Person memory and judgment: Pragmatic influences on impressions formed in a social context. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 254–267.
Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 0131877.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holtgraves, T. Conversation, speech acts, and memory. Memory & Cognition 36, 361–374 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.361
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.361