Abstract
The microstructure of licking responses was analyzed to investigate the interaction between unconditioned responses to maltodextrin and the responses to flavor cues previously associated with maltodextrin. Experiment 1 demonstrated that although the consumption of maltodextrin peaked at intermediate concentrations, the mean lick cluster size showed a positive, monotonic increase with concentration. In Experiment 2, a (conditioned stimulus) CS+ flavor was paired with 16% maltodextrin, whereas a CS− flavor was paired with 2% maltodextrin. During test, consumption of the CS+ was higher than that of the CS− when the flavors were combined with 2% maltodextrin, but not when combined with 16% maltodextrin. In contrast, cluster size was larger with the CS+ than with the CS−, regardless of the concentration of maltodextrin present on test. Previous analyses of licking microstructure indicate that cluster size reflects the palatability of the ingested solution. Thus, the present results indicate that flavor conditioning can change the palatability of the cue flavors. Adding the CS+ flavor to maltodextrin produced results analogous to increasing the concentration of maltodextrin (in terms of both consumption and licking microstructure measures), which is consistent with the idea that after conditioning, responses to the CS+ flavor and to the unconditioned stimulus are mediated via the same representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asin, K. E., Davis, J. D., & Bednarz, L. (1992). Differential effects of serotonergic and catecholaminergic drugs on ingestive behavior. Psychopharmacology, 109, 415–421.
Capaldi, E. D. (1992). Conditioned food preferences. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 1–33). San Diego: Academic Press.
Capaldi, E. D., & Hunter, M. J. (1994). Taste and odor in conditioned flavor preference learning. Learning & Behavior, 22, 355–365.
Davis, J. D. (1996). Microstructural analysis of the ingestive behavior of the rat ingesting polycose. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 1557–1563.
Davis, J. D. (1998). A model for the control of ingestion—20 years later. In S. J. Fluharty & A. R. Morrison (Eds.), Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 127–173). San Diego: Academic Press.
Davis, J. D., & Levine, M. W. (1977). Model for control of ingestion. Psychological Review, 84, 379–412.
Davis, J. D., & Perez, M. C. (1993). Food deprivation-induced and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior. American Journal of Physiology, 264, R97-R103.
Davis, J. D., & Smith, G. P. (1992). Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 217–228.
Dwyer, D. M., & Quirk, R. H. (in press). Context conditional flavor preferences in the rat based on fructose and maltodextrin reinforcers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Elizalde, G., & Sclafani, A. (1988). Starch-based conditioned flavor preferences in rats: Influence of taste, calories and CS-US delay. Appetite, 11, 179–200.
Grill, H. J., & Norgren, R. (1978). The taste reactivity test: I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Research, 143, 263–279.
Harris, J. A., & Thein, T. (2005). Interactions between conditioned and unconditioned flavor preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 407–417.
Higgs, S., & Cooper, S. J. (1998). Effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands on the ingestion of sucrose, intralipid, and maltodextrin: An investigation using a microstructural analysis of licking behavior in a brief contact test. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 447–457.
Holland, P. C. (1990). Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action. Cognition, 37, 105–131.
Hsiao, S., & Fan, R. J. (1993). Additivity of taste-specific effects of sucrose and quinine—Microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 317–326.
Myers, K. P., & Sclafani, A. (2001a). Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 74, 481–493.
Myers, K. P., & Sclafani, A. (2001b). Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: II. Taste reactivity analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 74, 495–505.
Nissenbaum, J. W., & Sclafani, A. (1987). Sham-feeding response of rats to polycose and sucrose. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 11, 215–222.
Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Learning & Behavior, 30, 73–95.
Rozin, P., & Zellner, D. (1985). The role of Pavlovian conditioning in the acquisition of food likes and dislikes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 443, 189–202.
Sclafani, A. (1987). Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity—An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 11, 131–153.
Sclafani, A. (2002). Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: Two-bottle tests revisited. Physiology & Behavior, 76, 633–644.
Sclafani, A. (2004). The sixth taste? Appetite, 43, 1–3.
Sclafani, A., & Ackroff, K. (1994). Glucose-conditioned and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats—Taste versus postingestive conditioning. Physiology & Behavior, 56, 399–405.
Sclafani, A., Cardieri, C., Tucker, K., Blusk, D., & Ackroff, K. (1993). Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. American Journal of Physiology, 265, R320-R325.
Sclafani, A., Fanizza, L. J., & Azzara, A. V. (1999). Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats. Physiology & Behavior, 67, 227–234.
Sclafani, A., & Nissenbaum, J. W. (1988). Robust conditioned flavor preference produced by intragastric starch infusions in rats. American Journal of Physiology, 255, R672-R675.
Spector, A. C., Klumpp, P. A., & Kaplan, J. M. (1998). Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 678–694.
Spector, A. C., & St. John, S. J. (1998). Role of taste in the microstructure of quinine ingestion by rats. American Journal of Physiology, 274 (6, Pt. 2), R1687-R1703.
Stevenson, R. J., Boakes, R. A., & Wilson, J. P. (2000). Resistance to extinction of conditioned odor perceptions: Evaluative conditioning is not unique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 423–440.
Warwick, Z. S., Synowski, S. J., Coons, V., & Hendrickson, A. (1999). Flavor-cued modulation of intake in rats: Role of familiarity and impact on 24-h intake. Physiology & Behavior, 67, 527–532.
Warwick, Z. S., & Weingarten, H. P. (1996). Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: Implications for interpreting two-bottle tests. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 711–715.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The experimental work reported in the present article was supported by a BBSRC New Investigator Award to D.M.D. The author also thanks an anonymous reviewer of an earlier version of this article for the suggestion that weak and strong maltodextrin could be represented separately; thus, differential responding might be under the control of the CS-.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dwyer, D.M. Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin. Learning & Behavior 36, 149–158 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.2.149
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.36.2.149