Abstract
The relationship between depth of information processing and stimulus repetitions was investigated using a simultaneous category judgment task. Several levels of processing were defined involving (1) physically identical items, (2) physically different but same-name items, (3) different items from the same semantic category, and (4) items from different categories. Stimulus pairs were represented by words and pictures, and each pair was presented one, three, or five times. Response times for categorization judgments increased with the level of processing and decreased with repetitions. Repetitions produced greater facilitation for decisions at deeper levels of processing. In a final incidental recall task, more items were remembered from category-same trials than from same-item trials, but level of processing did not interact with number of presentations. Repetitions produced an equivalent increase in final recall probability for items involved in all decision types, indicating that distributed repetitions can lead to the formation of stronger memory traces at several levels of processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.).The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, II. New York: Academic Press. 1968. Pp. 89–195.
Craik, F. M. A “level of analysis” view of memory. In P. Pliner. L. Krames. & T. Alloway (Eds.).Communication and affect. Thought and language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Craik, F. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. M., &Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 1975,104, 268–294.
Craik, F. M., &Watkins, M. J. The role of rehearsal in short term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 599–607.
Dunn, L. M.Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, Minn: American Guidance Service, 1959.
Juola, J. F., Taylor, G. A., &Young, M. E. Stimulus encoding and decision processes in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1108–1115.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart. & Winston, 1971.
Posner, M. I. Abstraction and the process of recognition. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in learning and theory, III. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969. pp. 152–179.
Rosch, E. Cognitive representation of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 1975,104, 192–235.
Rundus, D. Analyses of rehearsal processes in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 63–77.
Rundus, D., &Atkinson, R. C. Rehearsal processes in free recall: A procedure for direct observation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 99–105.
Schulman, A. I. Memory for words recently classified.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 47–52.
Snodgrass, J. G., &McClure, P. Storage and retrieval properties of dual codes for pictures and words in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,5, 521–529.
Waugh, N. C., &Norman, R. A. Primary memory.Psychological Review, 1965,72, 89–104.
Wuke, E. L., & Church, J. D. Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, in press.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by NSF Grant BMS74-12801 to the third author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chabot, R.J., Miller, T.J. & Juola, J.F. The relationship between repetition and depth of processing. Memory & Cognition 4, 677–682 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213234
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213234