Abstract
Three experiments were performed to examine the role that central and peripheral vision play in the perception of the direction of translational self-motion, or heading, from optical flow. When the focus of radial outflow was in central vision, heading accuracy was slightly higher with central circular displays (10°–25° diameter) than with peripheral annular displays (40° diameter), indicating that central vision is somewhat more sensitive to this information. Performance dropped rapidly as the eccentricity of the focus of outflow increased, indicating that the periphery does not accurately extract radial flow patterns. Together with recent research on vection and postural adjustments, these results contradict theperipheral dominance hypothesis that peripheral vision is specialized for perception of self-motion. We propose afunctional sensitivity hypothesis—that. self-motion is perceived on the basis of optical information rather than the retinal locus of stimulation, but that central and peripheral vision are differentially sensitive to the information characteristic of each retinal region.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amblard, A., &Carblanc, B. (1980). Role of foveal and peripheral visual information in the maintenance of postural equilibrium in man.Perceptual & Molar Skills,51, 903–912.
Andersen, G. J. (1986). Perception of self-motion: Psychophysical and computational approaches.Psychological Bulletin,99, 52–65.
Andersen, G. J., &Braunstein, M. L. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 122–132.
Andersen, G. J., &Dvre, B. P. (1989). Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 453–458.
Andersen, R., Graziano, M., &Snowden, R. (1991). Selectivity of area MST neurons for expansion/contraction and rotation motions.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,32, 823.
Begbie, G. H. (1966). The effects of alcohol and of varying amounts of visual information on a balancing test.Ergonomics,9, 325–333.
Berthoz, A., Lacour, M., Soechting, J. F., &Vidal, P. P. (1979). The role of vision in the control of posture during linear motion.Progress in Brain Research,50, 197–209.
Berthoz, A., Pavard, B., &Young, L. R. (1975). Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linear vection).Experimental Brain Research,23, 471–489.
Brandt, T., Dichgans, J., &Koenig, E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception.Experimental Brain Research,16, 476–491.
Brandt, T., Wist, E. R., &Dichgans, J. (1975). Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 497–503.
Braunstein, M. L., &Todd, J.T. (1990). On the distinction between artifacts and information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 211–216.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1972). Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin,77, 405–408.
Crowell, J. A., Royden, C. S., Banks, M. S., Swenson, K. H., &Sekuler, A. B. (1990). Optic flow and heading judgments.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,31, 522.
De Bruyn, B., &Orban, G.A. (1990). The role of direction information in the perception of geometric optic flow components.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 433–488.
De Graaf, J. B., Van Asten, W. N. J. C., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1990).The effect of central and peripheral vision on postural balance of a human viewing a rotating scene. Unpublished manuscript.
Dewrme, A., &Martin, C. (1986). Roles of retinal periphery and depth periphery in linear vection and visual control of standing in humans.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 176–187.
Dichgans, J., &Brandt, T. (1978). Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H.-L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 8. Perception (pp. 755–804). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dickinson, J. (1969). A note on the role of peripheral vision in static balancing.Ergonomics,12, 935.
Dickinson, J., &Leonard, J. A. (1967). The role of peripheral vision in static balancing.Ergonomics,10, 421–429.
Gibson, J. J. (1950).Perception of the visual world. Boston: Hough-ton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1954). The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement.Psychological Review,61, 304–314.
Gibson, J. J. (1968). What gives rise to the perception of motion?Psychological Review,75, 335–346.
Hatsopoulos, N., &Warren, W. (1991). Visual navigation with a neural network.Neural Networks,4, 303–317.
Held, R., Dichgans, J., &Bauer, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation.Vision Research,15, 357–365.
Howard, I. P., &Heckmann, T. (1989). Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays.Perception,18, 657–665.
Johansson, G. (1977). Studies on visual perception of locomotion.Perception,6, 365–376.
Kung, J. W., &Riggs, L. A. (1971).Woodworth & Schlosberg’s Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Koenderink, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1987). Facts on optic flow.Biological Cybernetics,56, 247–254.
Lee, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In R. B. Macleod & H. Pick (Eds.),Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson (pp. 250–267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lee, D. N., &Lishman, J. R. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance.Journal of Human Movement Studies,1, 87–95.
Lestienne, F., Soechting, J., &Berthoz, A. (1977). Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes.Experimental Brain Research,28, 363–384.
Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., &Aitsebaomo, P. (1984). Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers.Vision Research,24, 789–800.
McCarty, M. E., & Ashmead, D. H. (1991).The efficacy of central visual stimulation for regulating postural sway. Unpublished manuscript.
McKee, S. P., &Nakayama, K. (1984). The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field.Vision Research,24, 25–32.
Ohmi, M., Howard, I. P., &Landolt, J. P. (1987). Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships.Perception,16, 17–22.
Paulus, W. M., Straube, A., &Brandt, T. (1984). Visual stabilization of posture: Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects.Brain,107, 1143–1163.
Post, R. B. (1988). Circular vection is independent of stimulus eccentriciIy.Perception,17, 737–744.
Sakitt, B., &Barlow, H. B. (1982). A model for the economical encoding of the visual image in cerebral cortex.Biological Cybernetics,43,97–108.
Saito, H., Yukie, M., Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Fukada, Y., &Iwai, E. (1986). Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the Macaque monkey.Journal of Neuroscience,6, 145–157.
Shaver, S. W., Telford, L., &Frost, B. J. (1991). The role of stereoscopic depth cues in centrally-mediated linear vection.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,32, 696.
Stoffregen, T. A. (1985). Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 554–565.
Stoffregen, T. A. (1986). The role of optical velocity in the control of stance.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 355–360.
Stoffregen, T. A., &Riccio, G. E. (1990). Responses to optical looming in the retinal center and periphery.Ecological Psychology,2, 251–274.
Tanaka, K., &Saito, H. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the Macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,62, 626–641.
Telford, L., &Frost, B. J. (1991). The role of kinetic depth cues in centrally-mediated linear vection.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,32, 830.
Van De Grind, W. A., Koenderink, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1986). The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field.Vision Research,26, 797–810.
Van De Grind, W. A., Van Doorn, A. J., &Koenderink, J. J. (1983). Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns.Journal of the Optical Society of America,73, 1674–1683.
Warren, W. H., Blackwell, A. W., & Kurtz, K. J. (1992).Minimal conditions for perception of heading from optical flow. (Manuscript in preparation)
Warren, W. H., BLackwell, A. W., Kurtz, K. J., Hatsopoulos, N. G., &Kaush, M. L. (1991). On the sufficiency of the velocity field for perception of heading.Biological Cybernetics,65, 311–320.
Warren, W. H., &Hannon, D. J. (1990). Eye movements and optical flow.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,7, 160–169.
Warren, W. H., Morris, M. W., &Kaush, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 646–660.
Watanamiuk, S. N. J., Sekuler, R., &Wiluams, D. W. (1989). Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: The integration of direction information.Vision Research,29, 47–59.
Westheimer, G. (1982). The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field.Vision Research,22, 157–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant AG05223 from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warren, W.H., Kurtz, K.J. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 443–454 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211640
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211640