Abstract
Several temporal and spatial factors affect gender recognition of a walker when portrayed, without familiarity cues, as a dynamic point-light display. We demonstrate that, among temporal parameters, the duration of the dynamic stimulus must be longer than 1.6 sec, but that 2.7 sec is fully adequate. Given the speed of our walkers, the recognition threshold appears to be roughly two step cycles. In addition, presentation rate of the stimulus must be near to normal, perhaps because nonnormal rates alter apparent gravity and obscure the normal relationship between output and conservation of energy. We demonstrate that, among spatial factors, the discreteness of the joint information must be maintained for accurate recognition. We go on to argue that it is the information about the shoulder and the hip of a walker that is of primary importance. Finally, inversion of the stimulus display produces the unexpected effect of reversing the apparent sex of most walkers. That is, when presented upside down, male walkers appear female and female walkers appear male.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckett, R., &Chang, K. An evaluation of the kinematics of gait by minimum energy. In D. Bootzin & H. C. Muffley (Eds.),Biomechanics. New York: Plenum, 1969.
Bernstein, N.The co-ordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon, 1967.
Birdwhistell, R. L.Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.
Bornstein, M. H., &Bornstein, H. G. The pace of life.Nature, 1976,259, 557–559.
Carlsoö, S.How man moves. London: Heinemann, 1972.
Cutting, J. E., &Kozlowski, L. T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,9, 353–356.
Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R., & Kozlowski, L. T. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, in press.
Farber, J.The student as nigger. New York: Pocket Books, 1969.
Gray, H.Anatomy, descriptive and surgical. New York: 1977 (15th ed. originally published 1901).
Grillner, S. Locomotion in vertebrates: Central mechanisms and reflex action.Physiological Review, 1975,55, 247–304.
Harmon, L. The recognition of faces.Scientific American, 1973,229 (5). 70–84.
Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 201–211.
Johansson, G. Visual motion perception.Scientific American, 1975,232 (6). 76–89.
Johansson, G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception.Psychological Research, 1976,38, 379–393.
Jones, M. R. Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 323–355.
Kohler, I. The formation and transformation of the perceptual world.Psychological Issues, 1964,3(4), 1–173.
Kozlowski, L. T., &Cutting, J. E. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 575–580.
Napier, J. The antiquity of human walking.Scientific American, 1967,216(4), 56–66.
Steindler, A.Mechanisms of normal and pathological locomotion in man. Springfield. Ill: Thomas, 1935.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on the Master’s thesis of the first author. This research was supported by a small research grant from Wesleyan University to each of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barclay, C.D., Cutting, J.E. & Kozlowski, L.T. Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 23, 145–152 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208295
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208295