Abstract
Observers made forced-choice opaque/luminous responses to targets of varying luminance and varying size presented (1) on the wall of a laboratory, (2) as a disk within an annulus, and (3) embedded within a Mondrian array presented within a vision tunnel. Lightness matches were also made for nearby opaque surfaces. The results show that the threshold luminance value at which a target begins to appear self-luminous increases with its size, defined as perceived size, not retinal size. More generally, the larger the target, the more an increase in its luminance induces grayness/blackness into the surround and the less it induces luminosity into the target, and vice versa. Corresponding to this luminosity/grayness tradeoff, there appears to be an invariant: Across a wide variety of conditions, a target begins to appear luminous when its luminance is about 1.7 times that of a surface that would appear white in the same illumination. These results show that the luminosity threshold behaves like a surface lightness value—the maximum lightness value, in fact—and is subject to the same laws of anchoring (such as the area rule proposed by Li & Gilchrist, 1999) as surface lightness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonato, F., &Cataliotti, J. (1996). Perceived area and figure/ground relations affect the luminosity threshold.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,37, s174.
Bonato, F., &Gilchrist, A. L. (1994). The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations.Perception,23, 991–1006.
Coren, S. (1969). Brightness contrast as a function of figure-ground relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 517–524.
Diamond, A. (1953). Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances.Journal of Experimental Psychology,45, 304–314.
Evans, R. M. (1974).The perception of color. New York: Wiley.
Freeman, R. B. (1967). Contrast interpretation of brightness constancy.Psychological Bulletin,67, 165–187.
Fry, G. A., &Alpern, M. (1953). The effect of a peripheral glare source upon the apparent brightness of an object.Journal of the Optical Society of America,43, 89–195.
Gelb, A. (1929). Die “Farbenkonstanz” der Sehdinge [The “color constancy” of visual objects]. In W. A. von Bethe (Ed.),Handbuch der Normalen und Pathologischen Psychologie (Vol. 12, pp. 594–678). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Gilchrist, A. L., &Bonato, F. (1995). Anchoring of lightness values in center/surround displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1427–1440.
Goldhammer, H. (1934). The influence of area, position, and brightness in the perception of a reversible configuration.American Journal of Psychology,46, 186–206.
Heinemann, E. G. (1955). Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances.Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 89–96.
Horeman, H. W. (1965). Relations between brightness and luminance under induction.Vision Research,5, 331–340.
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.
Katz, D. (1935).The world of colour. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Künnapas, T. (1957). Experiments on figural dominance.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 31–39.
Leibowitz, H., Mote, F. A., &Thurlow, W. R. (1953). Simultaneous contrast as a function of separation between test and inducing fields.Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 453–456.
Li, X., &Gilchrist, A. (1999). Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 771–785.
Lie, I (1977). Perception of illumination.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,18, 251–255.
Noguchi, K., &Kozaki, A. (1985). Perceptual scission of surface-lightness and illumination: An examination of the Gelb effect.Psychological Research,47, 19–25.
Oyama, T. (1950). Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue, and orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,60,299–3055.
Rock, I, &Brosgole, L. (1964). Grouping based on phenomenal proximity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 531–538.
Rock, I., &Ebenholtz, S. (1959). The relational determination of perceived size.Psychological Review,66, 387–401.
Shimojo, S., &Nakayama, K. (1990). Amodal presence of partially occluded surfaces: Role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence.Perception,19, 285–299.
Speigle, J. M., &Brainard, D. H. (1996). Luminosity thresholds: Effects of test chromaticity and ambient illumination.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,13, 436–451.
Torii, S., &Uemura, Y. (1965). Effects of inducing luminance and area upon the apparent brightness of a test field.Japanese Psychological Research,2, 86–100.
Ullman, S. (1976). On visual detection of light sources.Biological Cybernetics,21, 205–212.
Wallach, H. (1948). Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 310–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonato, F., Gilchrist, A.L. Perceived area and the luminosity threshold. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 786–797 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206897
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206897