Abstract
In Experiment 1, subjects were required to estimateloudness ratios for 45 pairs of tones. Ten 1,200-Hz tones, differing only in intensity, were used to generate the 45 distinct tone pairs. In Experiment 2, subjects were required to directly compare two pairs of tones (chosen from among the set of 45) and indicate which pair of tones had the greaterloudness ratio. In both Experiments 1 and 2, the subjects’ judgments were used to rank order the tone pairs with respect to their judged loudness ratios. Nonmetric analyses of these rank orders indicated that both magnitude estimates of loudness ratios and direct comparisons of loudness ratios were based on loudnessintervals ordifferences where loudness was a power function of sound pressure. These experiments, along with those on loudness difference judgments (Parker & Schneider, 1974; Schneider, Parker, & Stein, 1974), support Torgerson’s (1961) conjecture that there is but one comparative perceptual relationship for ioudnesses, and that differences in numerical estimates for loudness ratios as opposed to loudness intervals simply reflect different reporting strategies generated by the two sets of instructions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Parker, S., Schneider, B., & Valenti, M. Nonmetric determination of the loudness function. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, 1973.
References
Birnbaum, M. H., &Veit, C. T. Scale convergence as a criterion for rescaling: Information integration with difference, ratio, and averaging tasks.Perception & Psychophysics. 1974,15, 7–15.
Carvellas, T., &Schneider, B. Direct estimation of multidimensional tonal dissimilarity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 1839–1848.
Eisler, H. Empirical test of a model relating magnitude and category scales.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1962,3. 88–96.
Hellman, R., &Zwislocki, J. Monaural loudness function at 1000 eps and interaural summation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 856–865.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., &Tversky, A.Foundations of measurement (Vol. I) Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27.
Mcrobert, H., Bryan, M. E., &Tempest, W. Magnitude estimation of loudness.Journal of Sound Vibration, 1965,2, 391–401.
Marks, L. E. On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 358–376.
Parker, S., &Schneider, B. Non-metric scaling of loudness and pitch using similarity and difference estimates.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 238–242.
Parker, S., Schneider, B., &Kanow, G. Ratio scale measurement of the perceived lengths of lines.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 1975.104, 195–204.
Richards, A. M. Non-metric scaling of loudness. I. 1000-Hz tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 582–588.
Schneider, B., &Lane, H. Ratio scales, category scales, and variability in the production of loudness and softness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1953–1961.
Schneider, B., Parker, S., &Stein, D. The measurement of loudness using direct comparisons of sensory intervals.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974,11, 259–273.
Shepard, R. N. Metric structures in ordinal data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 287–315.
Siegel, S.Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956. Pp. 229–238.
Stevens, J. C., &Guirao, M. Individual loudness functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 2210–2213.
Stevens, S. S. The relation of pitch to intensity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1935,6, 150–154.
Stevens, S. S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitude-loudness.American Journal of Psychology, 1956,69, 1–25.
Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law.Psychological Renew, 1957,64, 153–181.
Stevens, S. S. On the new psychophysics.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960,1, 27–35.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 426–450.
Stevens, S. S., &Galanter, E. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 377–411.
Stevens, S. S., &Guirao, M. Loudness, reciprocality. and partition scales.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962,34, 1466–1471.
Torgerson, W. S. Distances and ratios in psychophysical scaling.Acta Psychologica, 1961,19, 201–205.
Young, F. W. Nonmetnc multidimensional scaling: Recovery of metric information.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 455–473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NSF Grant GB 36211. and in part by a grant trom the National Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Farrell, G. et al. The perceptual basis of loudness ratio judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 19, 309–320 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204236
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204236