Abstract
We examined the order effect in item-recognition response time, that is, differences in response time for multiple-item probes containing items in the same or in the reverse order as those in the memory set. Experiment 1 used the response condition in which only one item must be positive for a positive response, Experiment 2 used homogeneous probes in which all the items are either positive or negative, and Experiment 3 used the condition in which all the items must be positive. Of particular interest were the serial position variations in order effects for probes containing items that were adjacent in the memory set. We previously found that such effects are an indication of subjective grouping of the memory set and the matching of the probe with these subgroups. The order effect in the one-positive condition was only weak in most cases, but it was strong with homogeneous probes when the memory set was objectively grouped or was ungrouped but with a constant set size. There were also strong order effects in the all-positive condition for probes with items that were nonadjacent in the memory set. Our results are interpreted in terms of a parallel match process based on a distribution over position of items in subjective or objective groups. We account for the origin of the distribution-over-position process in terms of multiple representations of the grouped memory sets. The model assumes that each subgroup is represented in memory several, and perhaps very many, times and that considerable error in item positioning can occur over the multiple representations of any group.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersos, J. A. (1973). A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists.Psychological Review,811, 417–438.
Angiolillo-Bent, J. S., &Rips, L. J. (1982). Order information in multiple-element comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 392–406.
Baumgarte, R., &De Rosa, D. V. (1973). Information processing in a two-item classification task: Relationship among items in a memorized set.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 1–7.
Drewnowski, A. (1980). Attributes and priorities in short-term recall: A new model of memory scan.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 208–250.
Eich, J. M. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration and CHARM.Psychological Review,92, 1–38.
Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 161–190). Washington, DC: Winston.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain,J. D., & Tehan, G. (1987).Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva and Matrix models. Unpublished manuscript.
Murdock, B. B. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Edbanm.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,119, 609–626.
Pike, A. R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition.Psychological Review,91, 281–294.
Pike, A. R., Dalgleish, L., &Jackson, K. (1985). Order effect in recognition latency for multiple-item probes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 248–261.
Proctor, R. W., &Heals, A. F. (1985). Order-relevant and order-irrelevant decison rules in multiletter matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 519–537.
Proctor, R. W., &Healy, A. F. (1987). Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 180–194.
Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching.Psychological Review,88, 552–572.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Cook, J. R. (1978). Short-term forgetting of item and order reformation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 189–218.
Walker, E C. T. (1972). The effect of structure on scanning strategies.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 427–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pike, R., Jackson, K. & Dalgleish, L. Order and serial position effects in response time with multiple-item probe recognition. Memory & Cognition 16, 220–231 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197755
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197755