Abstract
Partial report methods have shown that a large-capacity representation exists for a few hundred milliseconds after a picture has disappeared. However,change blindness studies indicate that very limited information remains available when a changed version of the image is presented subsequently. What happens to the large-capacity representation? New input after the first image may interfere, but this is likely to depend on the characteristics of the new input. In our first experiment, we show that a display containing homogeneous image elements between changing images does not render the largecapacity representation unavailable. Interference occurs when these new elements define objects. On that basis we introduce a new method to produce change blindness: The second experiment shows that change blindness can be induced by redefining figure and background, without an interval between the displays. The local features (line segments) that defined figures and background were swapped, while the contours of the figures remained where they were. Normally, changes are easily detected when there is no interval. However, our paradigm results in massive change blindness. We propose that in a change blindness experiment, there is a large-capacity representation of the original image when it is followed by a homogeneous interval display, but that change blindness occurs whenever the changed image forces resegregation of figures from the background.
Article PDF
References
Becker, M. W., Pashler, H., &Anstis, S. M. (2000). The role of iconic memory in change detection tasks.Perception,29, 273–286.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 87–114.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Di Lollo, V., &Dixon, P. (1988). Two forms of persistence in visual information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 671–681.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., &Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness.Vision Research,43, 149–164.
Loftus, G. R., Duncan, J., &Gehrig, P. (1992). On the time course of perceptual information that results from a brief visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 530–549.
Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,390, 279–281.
O’ Regan, J. K., &Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 939–973.
O’ Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., &Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes.”Nature,398, 34.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 369–378.
Phillips, W. A., &Singer, W. (1974). Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision: I. Psychophysics.Experimental Brain Research,19, 493–506.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 245–277.
Simons, D. J., Franconeri, S. L., &Reimer, R. L. (2000). Change blindness in the absence of visual disruption.Perception,29, 1143–1154.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs,74 (11, Whole No. 498), 1–29.
Yantis, S., &Jonides J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
R. L. is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H. & Lamme, V.A.F. The role of figure-ground segregation in change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 254–261 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196567
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196567