Abstract
The ABX psychophysical task is very useful when the dimensions along which the stimulus varies cannot be readily described. However, there are a few problems associated with its use. First, the task has often been used with slight procedural variations, which hinders the extraction of a bias-free index of performance. Second, the most common index of sensitivity derived from this task is the ubiquitous proportion correct. Third, some researchers undervalue the importance that the decision strategy adopted by the observer has on estimates of sensitivity.We describe a standard methodology for the ABX task and outline models of performance based on two decision strategies. These models can be used to extract the detection-theoretic index of performance,d’, from ABX data. The results of three ABX discrimination experiments, in which circle size, number value, and tone amplitude are used, are reported. Analysis of the decision spaces derived from observer responses indicates that these observers adopted a suboptimal difference decision strategy, even after they had received considerable practice with feedback. This suggests that, given no prior knowledge of the nature of the decision strategy adopted by an observer, the difference model of ABX discrimination could be a good choice when observer performance is estimated
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, M., &Stegun, I.A. (1972).Handbook of mathematical functions:With formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (9th ed.). New York: Dover.
Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Perrett, D. I., Etcoff, N. L., &Rowland, D. (1996). Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions.Visual Cognition,3, 81–117.
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., &Mehler, J. (1997). A distressing “deafnessc in French?Journal of Memory & Language,36, 406–421.
Elliott, P. B. (1964). Tables ofd’. In J. A. Swets (Ed.),Signal detection and recognition by human observers: Contemporary readings (pp. 651–664). New York: Wiley.
Etcoff, N. L., &Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical expression of facial expression.Cognition,44, 227–240.
Hautus, M. J., &Irwin, R. J. (1992). Amplitude discrimination of sinusoids and narrow-band noise with Rayleigh properties.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 53–62.
Hjorth, J. S. U. (1994).Computer intensive statistical methods. London: Chapman & Hall.
Irwin, R. J., &Hautus, M. J. (1996). Exposing the decision space for judgments of identity and difference. In S. C. Masin,Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 287–292). Padua: International Society For Psychophysics.
Kaplan, H. L., Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1978). Tables of d’ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,10, 796–813.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 358–368.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., &Creelman, C. D. (1977). The psychophysics of categorical perception.Psychological Review,84, 452–471.
Noreen, D. L. (1981). Optimal decision rules for some common psychophysical paradigms. In S. Grossberg (Ed.),Mathematical psychology and psychophysiology:Proceedings of the Symposiumin Applied Mathematics of the American Mathematical Society and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (Vol. 13, pp. 237–280). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Pastore, R. E., Li, X.-F., &Layer, J. K. (1990). Categorical perception of nonspeech chirps and bleats.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 151–156.
Pierce, J. R., &Gilbert, E. N. (1958). On AX and ABX limens.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,30, 593–595.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., &Flannery, B. P. (1992).Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, D. E., &Watson, C. S. (1972). Psychophysical methods in modern psychoacoustics. In J. V. Tobias (Ed.),Foundationsofmodern auditory theory (Vol. 2, pp. 101–131). New York: Academic Press.
Shao, J., &Tu, D. (1995).The jackknife and bootstrap. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Spence, K. W. (1937). Differential responding in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension.Psychological Review,44, 430–444.
Swets, J. A. (1986). Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models.Psychological Bulletin,99, 100–117.
Tanner, W. P., Jr., &Birdsall, T. G. (1958). Definition of d and h as psychophysical measures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,30, 922–928.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hautus, M.J., Meng, X. Decision strategies in the ABX (matching-to-sample) psychophysical task. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 89–106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194559
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194559