Abstract
The abrupt appearance of a new perceptual object in the visual field typically captures visual attention. However, if attention is focused in advance on a different location, onsets can fail to capture attention (Yantis & Jonides, 1990). In the present experiments, we investigated the extent to which the deployment of attention to the local level of a hierarchical scene may be affected by the abrupt appearance of a new object at the global level. Participants searched for a semi-disk target in an array of randomly oriented segmented disks (“pacmen”). On half the trials, a subset of the segmented disks induced a subjective square. On these critical trials, participants were significantly slower to respond to the presence of a local target even though the local features of the display were qualitatively identical across all conditions. This slowing was absent when outline pacmen were used (which do not induce subjective figures) and when the subjective square was perceptually old. When the participants’ task was defined at the global level of the display, a new local element failed to capture attention, suggesting an asymmetry in the ability of objects at different levels of a hierarchical scene to capture attention. In a control experiment, a new local element captured attention, however, when the participants’ task was defined at the local level, indicating that the local item was in principle capable of capturing attention. It is argued that global objects capture attention because they convey important information about the environment that is not available at the local level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review,83, 1–36.
Dresp, B. (1992). Local brightness mechanisms sketch out surfaces but do not fill them in: Psychophysical evidence in the Kanizsa square.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 562–570.
Dresp, B., Lorenceau, J., &Bonnet, C. (1989). Apparent brightness enhancement in the Kanizsa square with and without illusory contour formation.Perception,19, 483–489.
Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (in press). New objects dominate luminance transients in attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Enns, J. T., &Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli.Psychological Science,6, 283–291.
Enns, J. T., Yantis, S., & Di Lollo, V. (1998, May).Luminance transients capture attention, but only in new display locations. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings?Perception & Psychophysics,61, 727–739.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Gellatly, A., Cole, G., &Blurton, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1609–1624.
Gibson, B. S. (1996a). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1514–1520.
Gibson, B. S. (1996b). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1496–1504.
Grabowecky, M., & Treisman, A. M. (1989, May).Attention and fixation in subjective contour perception. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Saratoga, FL.
Halpern, D. F. (1987). The functional equivalence of objective and illusory brightness enhancement. In S. J. Petri & G. E. Meyer (Eds.),The perception of illusory contours (pp. 171–175). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Kanizsa, G. (1987). Quasi-perceptual margins in homogeneously stimulated fields (W. Gerbino, Trans.). In S. J. Petri & G. E. Meyer (Eds.),The perception of illusory contours (pp. 40–49). New York: Springer-Verlag. (Original work published 1955)
Kanizsa, G. (1990). Subjective contours. In I. Rock (Ed.),The perceptual world: Readings from Scientific American (pp. 155–163). New York: W. H. Freeman. (Original work published 1976)
Kinchla, R. A., &Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”Perception & Psychophysics,25, 225–231.
Lamb, M. R., &Robertson, L. C. (1990). The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 489–496.
Lamb, M. R., &Yund, E. W. (1996). Spatial frequency and interference between global and local levels of structure.Visual Cognition,3, 193–219.
Lamb, M. R., Yund, E. W., &Pond, H. M. (1999). Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,128, 88–94.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1995). Seeing the forest but only half the trees?Nature,373, 521–523.
Meyer, G. E., &Fish, D. (1987). Illusory contours, texture segregation, and a configural inferiority effect. In S. J. Petri & G. E. Meyer (Eds.),The perception of illusory contours (pp. 224–234). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Meyer, G. E., &Garges, C. (1979). Subjective contours and the Poggendorff illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 302–304.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.),Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411–422). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383.
Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence.Psychological Research,43, 1–32.
Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.Cognitive Psychology,9, 441–474.
Paquet, L. (1992). Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 512–529.
Paquet, L., &Merikle, P. M. (1988). Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 89–100.
Parks, T. E. (1980). [Letter to the Editor]. Perception,9, 723.
Pomerantz, J. R., Goldberg, D. M., Golder, P. S., &Tetewsky, S. (1981). Subjective contours can facilitate performance in a reactiontime task.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 605–611.
Prazdny, K. (1983). Illusory contours are not caused by simultaneous brightness contrast.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 403–404.
Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (1998, May).Attentional capture through levels of representation. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.
Rieger, J., &Gegenfurtner, K. R. (1998). Contrast sensitivity and appearance in briefly presented illusory figures.Spatial Vision,12, 329–344.
Robertson, L. C. (1999). Spatial frequencies as a medium for guiding attention: Comment on Lamb, Yund, and Pond.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 95–98.
Siegel, S., &Petry, S. (1991). Evidence for independent processing of subjective contour brightness and sharpness.Perception,20, 233–241.
Stoffer, T. H. (1994). Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset.Psychological Research,56, 83–98.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Todd, J. T., &Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a transientsustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 625–636.
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., &Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses.Science,224, 1260–1262.
Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F., &Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 243–251.
Watanabe, T., &Oyama, T. (1987). Are illusory contours a cause or a consequence of apparent differences in brightness and depth in the Kanizsa square?Perception,17, 513–521.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 156–161.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G.H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: APA.
Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1505–1513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Grant R01-MH43924 to S.Y.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rauschenberger, R., Yantis, S. Attentional capture by globally defined objects. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 1250–1261 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194538
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194538