Abstract
Visuomotor association learning involves learning to make a motor response to an arbitrary visual stimulus. This learning is essential for visual search and discrimination performance and is reliant upon a well-defined neural circuit in the brain that includes the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampal formation. In the present study, we investigated the possible role of attentional processes during such learning using dual-task interference. A motor, verbal, or perceptual concurrent task was performed during the learning/training block of a simple visual discrimination task. Contrary to expectation, the dual-task groups showed improved learning and learning-dependent performance compared with untrained control and non-dual-task trained groups. A second experiment revealed that this effect did not appear to be due to increased arousal level; the inclusion of alerting tones during learning did not result in facilitation. These findings suggest that the engagement of attention, but not arousal, during the acquisition of a visuomotor association can facilitate this learning and its expression.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Beilock, S. L., &Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 701–725.
Corr, P. J. (2003). Personality and dual-task processing: Disruption of procedural learning by declarative processing.Personality & Individual Differences,34, 1245–1269.
De Rammelaere, S., Stuyven, E., &Vandierendonck, A. (1999). The contribution of working memory resources in the verification of simple mental arithmetic sums.Psychological Research,62, 72–77.
Eysenck, M. W. (1982).Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.
Frensch, P. A., Wenke, D., &Rünger, D. (1999). A secondary tonecounting task suppresses expression of knowledge in the serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 260–274.
Hampson, P. J. (1989). Aspects of attention and cognitive science.Irish Journal of Psychology,10, 261–275.
Jiménez, L., &Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 236–259.
Knight, R. T. (1990). Neural mechanisms of event-related potentials: Evidence from human lesion studies. In J. W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, & R. Johnson, Jr. (Eds.),Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 3–18). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., &Strayer, D. L. (1995). Training for attentional control in dual task settings: A comparison of young and old adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,1, 50–76.
Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., Muyllaert, I., Verbruggen, F., &Vanneste, W. (2005). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition.Memory,13, 550–560.
Logan, G. D., &Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 179–195.
Manly, T., Hawkins, K., Evans, J., Woldt, K., &Robertson, I. H. (2002). Rehabilitation of executive function: Facilitation of effective goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory alerts.Neuropsychologia,40, 271–281.
Matthews, G., &Davies, D. R. (2001). Individual differences in energetic arousal and sustained attention: A dual-task study.Personality & Individual Differences,31, 575–589.
Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., &Holley, P. J. (1993). Cognitive predictors of vigilance.Human Factors,35, 3–24.
Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., &Stammers, R. B. (2000).Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
McDowd, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging.Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences,52B, P265-P273.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex.Neuropsychology,8, 524–534.
Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., &Wilcox, K. (1999). Inhibition and aging: Similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information.Psychology & Aging,14, 44–59.
Musen, G., &Viola, J. (2000). Attentional requirements for object-location priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 646–653.
O’Connell, R. G., Belgrove, M. A., Dockree, P. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2004, April).Do periodic non-contingent cues improve sustained attention to response and goal-related electrodermal activity (EDA) in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
Parasuraman, R. (Ed.) (1998).The attentive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., &Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects.Neuropsychologia,35, 747–758.
Roche, R. A. P., Commins, S., &O’Mara, S. M. (2004). Low-level visuomotor learning disrupts higher-order behavioural control.Irish Journal of Psychology,25, 16–25.
Roche, R. A. P., &O’Mara, S. M. (2003). Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning during a visual search task.Cognitive Brain Research,15, 127–136.
Schubert, M., Johannes, S., Koch, M., Wieringa, B. M., Dengler, R., &Münte, T. F. (1998). Differential effects of two motor tasks on ERPs in an auditory classification task: Evidence of shared cognitive resources.Neuroscience Research,30, 125–134.
Smit, A. S., Eling, P. A. T. M., &Coenen, A. M. L. (2004). Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion.Acta Psychologica,115, 35–42.
Szymanski, K. F., &MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 165–175.
Warm, J. S., &Dember, W. N. (1998). Tests of vigilance taxonomy. In R. R. Hoffman, M. F. Sherrick, & J. S. Warm (Eds.),Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember (pp. 87–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). New York: Academic Press.
Wickens, C. D., &Kessel, C. (1980). Processing resource demands of failure detection in dynamic systems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 564–577.
Wilkins, A. J., Shallice, T., &McCarthy, R. (1987). Frontal lesions and sustained attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 359–365.
Wise, S. P., &Murray, E. A. (1999). Role of the hippocampal system in conditional motor learning: Mapping antecedents to action.Hippocampus,9, 101–117.
Wise, S. P., &Murray, E. A. (2000). Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions.Trends in Neurosciences,23, 271–276.
Wulf, G., &Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 648–660.
Yerkes, R. M., &Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation.Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology,18, 459–482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is dedicated to the memory of Jonathan Rickard (1977–2003), whose work is partially presented here. His passing is a huge loss professionally and personally to all who knew him. This work was supported by Enterprise Ireland; S.M.O. was in receipt of a Berkeley fellowship from Trinity College (2000–2001).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roche, R.A.P., Commins, S., Agnew, F. et al. Concurrent task performance enhances low-level visuomotor learning. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 513–522 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193908
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193908