Abstract
Cuing the identity of an upcoming target speeds its detection. This effect is generally assumed to operate on the level of the target dimension, not of its feature identity. Here, we investigated whether that is the case, in a design in which preparing for a cued dimension would incur costs as well as benefits. Participants searched for targets that could be defined on several dimensions, but were also presented with distractors that were defined on the same dimensions. Cuing the identity of an upcoming target increased the effect of distractors defined on the same dimension as the target. This suggests that cuing a target’s identity has effects that operate at least partly at the level of the target dimension.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Eysel, U. T., Muche, T., &Worgotter, F. (1988). Lateral interactions at direction-selective striate neurones in the cat demonstrated by local cortical inactivation.Journal of Physiology,399, 657–675.
Found, A., &Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimensionweighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 88–101.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.
Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., &Heller, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 901–917.
Liu, T., Slotnick, S. D., Serences, J. T., &Yantis, S. (2003). Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control.Cerebral Cortex,13, 1334–1343.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection.Visual Cognition,7, 571–595.
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.
Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., &Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulusand expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1021–1035.
Navalpakkam, V., &Itti, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention.Vision Research,45, 205–231.
Roe, A. W., &Ts’o, D. Y. (1995). Visual topography in primate V2: Multiple representation across functional stripes.Journal of Neuroscience,15, 3689–3715.
Shulman, G. L., d’Avossa, G., Tansy, A. P., &Corbetta, M. (2002). Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe.Cerebral Cortex,12, 1124–1131.
Theeuwes, J., Reimann, B., & Mortier, K. (in press). Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming.Visual Cognition.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 652–676.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., &Michels, K. M. (1991).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., &Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 483–502.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant 402-01-630 from the Dutch National Science Foundation (NWO) to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meeter, M., Theeuwes, J. Cuing the dimension of a distractor: Verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 118–124 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193822
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193822