Abstract
According to LeFevre, Sadesky, and Bisanz (1996), averaging solution latencies in order to study individuals’ arithmetic strategies can result in misleading conclusions. Therefore, in addition to classical chronometric data, they collected verbal reports and challenged the assumption that adults rely systematically on retrieval of arithmetic facts from memory to solve simple addition problems. However, Kirk and Ashcraft (2001) questioned the validity of such a methodology and concluded that a more appropriate method has to be found. Thus, we developed an operand recognition paradigm that does not rely on verbal reports or on solution latencies. In accordance with LeFevre et al., we show in a first experiment that adults resort to nonretrieval strategies to solve addition problems involvingmedium numbers. However, in a second experiment, we show that high-skilled individuals can solve the same problems using a retrieval strategy. The benefits of our paradigm to the study of arithmetic strategies are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory.Cognition,44, 75–106.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions.Mathematical Cognition,1, 3–34.
Ashcraft, M. H., &Battaglia, J. (1978). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 527–538.
Ashcraft, M. H., &Stazyk, E. H. (1981). Mental addition: A test of three verification models.Memory & Cognition,9, 185–196.
Barrouillet, P., &Fayol, M. (1998). From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval. Evidence for number and alphabetic arithmetic in children and adults.Memory & Cognition,26, 355–368.
Birn, M., Cox, R. W., &Bandettini, P. A. (2004). Experimental designs and processing strategies for fMRI studies involving overt verbal responses.NeuroImage,23, 1046–1056.
Blankenberger, S. (2001). The arithmetic tie effect is mainly encoding-based.Cognition,82, B15-B24.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation.Mathematical Cognition,1, 121–164.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Austin, S. (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults’ strategy choices for simple addition.Memory & Cognition,30, 988–994.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture and the repeated operand effect.Cognition,86, 71–96.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Oliphant, M. (1992). Representation and retrieval of arithmetic facts: A network-interference model and simulation. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origin of mathematical skills (pp. 331–364). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 299–315.
Carr, M., &Jessup, D. (1995). Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of mathematics strategy use.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 235–247.
Cohen, L., &Dehaene, S. (2000). Calculating without reading: Unsuspected residual abilities in pure alexia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,17, 563–583.
Crutcher, R. J. (1994). Telling what we know: The use of verbal report methodologies in psychological research.Psychological Science,5, 241–244.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic.Cortex,33, 219–250.
De Rammelaere, S., Stuyven, E., &Vandierendonck, A. (2001). Verifying simple arithmetic sums and products: Are the phonological loop and the central executive involved?Memory & Cognition,29, 267–273.
El Yagoubi, R., Lemaire, P., &Besson, M. (2003). Different brain mechanisms mediate two strategies in arithmetic: Evidence from visual event-related brain potentials.Neuropsychologia,41, 855–862.
Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, H. A. (1993).Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., &Price, L. A. (1963).Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
Geary, D. C. (1994).Children’s mathematical development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., &Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,8, 242–256.
Geary, D. C., &Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,6, 474–483.
Graham, D., &Campbell, J. I. D. (1992). Network interference and number fact retrieval: Evidence from children’s alphaplication.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 65–91.
Groen, G. J., &Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition.Psychological Review,79, 329–343.
Kirk, E. P., &Ashcraft, M. K. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 157–175.
LeFevre, J. A., Sadesky, G. S., &Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 216–230.
Lemaire, P., Barrett, S. E., Fayol, M., &Abdi, H. (1994). Automatic activation of addition and multiplication facts in elementary school children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,57, 224–258.
McCloskey, M., Harley, W., &Sokol, S. M. (1991). Models of arithmetic facts retrieval: An evaluation in light of findings from normal and brain-damaged subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 377–397.
Miller, K. F. Perlmutter, M., &Keating, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 46–60.
Payne, J. W. (1994). Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing.Psychological Science,5, 241–248.
Pesenti, M., Thioux, M., Seron, X., &De Volder, A. (2000). Neuroanatomical substrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison, and simple addition: A PET study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 461–479.
Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children’s addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 250–264.
Siegler, R. S. (1989). Hazards of mental chronometry: An example from children’s subtraction.Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 497–506.
Siegler, R. S. (1996).Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siegler, R. S., &Crowley, K. (1994). Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains.Cognitive Psychology,27, 194–226.
Smith-Chant, B. L., &LeFevre, J.-A. (2003). Doing as they are told and telling it like it is: Self-reports in mental arithmetic.Memory & Cognition,31, 516–528.
Svenson, O. (1985). Memory retrieval of answers of simple additions as reflected in response latencies.Acta Psychologica,59, 285–304.
Thevenot, C., &Barrouillet, P. (2006). Encoding numbers: Behavioral evidence for processing-specific representations.Memory & Cognition,34, 938–948.
Thevenot, C., Barrouillet, P., &Fayol, M. (2001). Algorithmic solution of arithmetic problems and operands-answer associations in LTM.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 599–611.
Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., &Ghesquière, P. (2002). Strategic competence: Applying Siegler’s theoretical and methodological framework to the domain of simple addition.European Journal of Psychology of Education,17, 275–291.
Towse, J. N., &Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 108–124.
Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (1998). A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 195–217.
Widaman, K. F., &Little, T. D. (1992). The development of skills in mental arithmetic: An individual differences perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origin of mathematical skills (pp. 189–253). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Geary, D. C., &Cormier, P. (1992). Individual differences in the development of skill in mental addition: Internal and external validation of chronometric models.Learning & Individual Differences,4, 167–213.
Wilson, T. D. (1994). The proper protocol: Validity and completeness of verbal reports.Psychological Science,5, 249–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thevenot, C., Fanget, M. & Fayol, M. Retrieval or nonretrieval strategies in mental arithmetic? An operand recognition paradigm. Memory & Cognition 35, 1344–1352 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193606
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193606