Abstract
Greater working memory capacity is usually associated with greater ability to maintain information in the face of interruptions. In two experiments, we found that some types of interruptions actually lead to greater forgetting among high-span people than among low-span people. Specifically, an instruction designed to change mental context resulted in significant forgetting for high-span people but minimal forgetting among the low-span people. Intentional forgetting instructions also resulted in greater forgetting among higher working memory capacity participants than among lower working memory capacity participants. A candidate explanation called the intensified context shift hypothesis is proposed which suggests that high-span people are more context dependent than low-span people.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjork, R. A., LaBerge, D., &LeGrand, R. (1968). The modification of short-term memory through instructions to forget.Psychonomic Science,10, 55–56.
Brewin, C. R., &Beaton, A. (2002). Thought suppression, intelligence, and WMC.Behaviour Research & Therapy,40, 923–930.
Bunting, M. F., Conway, A. R. A., &Heitz, R. P. (2004). Individual differences in the fan effect and working memory capacity.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 604–622.
Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1101–1114.
Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Conway, M. A., &Fthenaki, A. (2003). Disruption of inhibitory control of memory following lesions to the frontal and temporal lobes.Cortex,39, 667–686
Conway, M. A., Harries, K., Noyes, J., Racsmány, M., &Frankish, C. R. (2000). The disruption and dissolution of directed forgetting: Inhibitory control of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 409–430.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Delaney, P. F., &Knowles, M. E. (2005). Encoding strategy changes and spacing effects in the free recall of unmixed lists.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 120–130.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Francis, W. N., &KuČera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jaccard, J., &Turrisi, R. (2003).Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 336–358.
Knox, A. V. (2002).Functional magnetic resonance imaging of inhibitory processes during directed forgetting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., &Milne, A. B., &Ford, R. L. (1997). On regulation of recollection: The intentional forgetting of stereotypical memories.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,72, 709–719.
Mensink, G. M., &Raaijmakers, J. G. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,95, 434–455.
Oberauer, K., Lange, E., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and resistance to interference.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 80–96.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
Rosen, W., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.
Sahakyan, L., &Delaney, P. F. (2003). Can encoding differences explain the benefits of directed forgetting in the list-method paradigm?Journal of Memory & Language,48, 195–201.
Sahakyan, L., &Delaney, P. F. (2005). Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: Support for a two-factor account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,31, 789–801.
Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., &Kelley, C. M. (2004). Self-evaluation as a moderating factor in strategy change in directed forgetting benefits.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 131–136.
Sahakyan, L., &Kelley, C. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,28, 1064–1072.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context dependent memory: A review and meta analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 203–220.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working-memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Unsworth, N., &Engle, R. W. (2006). A temporal-contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors.Journal of Memory & Language,54, 346–362.
Wegner, D., Schneider, D., Carter, S., &White, T. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,53, 5–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delaney, P.F., Sahakyan, L. Unexpected Costs of High Working Memory Capacity Following Directed Forgetting and Contextual Change Manipulations. Memory & Cognition 35, 1074–1082 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193479
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193479