Abstract
Smith and Minda (1998, 2002) argued that the response scaling parameter γ in the exemplar-based generalized context model (GCM) makes the model unnecessarily complex and allows it to mimic the behavior of a prototype model. We evaluated this criticism in two ways. First, we estimated the complexity of the GCM with and without the γ parameter and also compared its complexity to that of a prototype model. Next, we assessed the extent to which the models mimic each other, using two experimental designs (Nosofsky & Zaki, 2002, Experiment 3; Smith & Minda, 1998, Experiment 2), chosen because these designs are thought to differ in the degree to which they can discriminate the models. The results show that γ can increase the complexity of the GCM, but this complexity does not necessarily allow mimicry. Furthermore, if statistical model selection methods such as minimum description length are adopted as the measure of model performance, the models will be highly discriminable, irrespective of design.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Casaki (Eds.),Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,37, 372–400.
Balasubramanian, V. (1997). Statistical inference, Occam’s razor and statistical mechanics on the space of probability distributions.Neural Computation,9, 349–368.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., &Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1995).Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman & Hall.
McKinley, S. C., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision-bound models in large-size, ill-defined category structures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 128–148.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Minda, J. P., &Smith, J. D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 775–799.
Minda, J. P., &Smith, J. D. (2002). Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 275–292.
Myung, J. I., Forster, M. R., &Browne, M. W. (2000). Special issue on model selection.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,44, 1–2.
Myung, J. I., Navarro, D. J., &Pitt, M. A. (2006). Model selection by normalized maximum likelihood.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,50, 167–179.
Navarro, D. J. (2007). On the interaction between exemplar-based concepts and a response scaling process.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,51, 85–98.
Navarro, D. J., Pitt, M. A., &Myung, I. J. (2004). Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data.Cognitive Psychology,49, 47–84.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (2002). Exemplar and prototype models revisited: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 924–940.
Olsson, H., Wennerholm, P., &Lyxzen, U. (2004). Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 936–941.
Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., &Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.Psychological Review,109, 472–491.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.
Rissanen, J. (1996). Fisher information and stochastic complexity.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,42, 40–47.
Rissanen, J. (2001). Strong optimality of the normalized ML models as universal codes and information in data.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,47, 1712–1717.
Roberts, F. S. (1979).Measurement theory. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Schervish, M. J. (1995).Theory of statistics. New York: Springer.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1411–1436.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (2002). Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 800–811.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement.Science,103, 677–680.
Su, Y., Myung, J. I., &Pitt, M. A. (2005). Minimum description length and cognitive modeling. In P. Grunwald, J. I. Myung & M. A. Pitt (Eds.),Advances in minimum description length: Theory and applications (pp. 411–433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wagenmakers, E. J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., &Iverson, G. J. (2004). Assessing model mimicry using the parametric bootstrap.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,48, 28–50.
Wagenmakers, E. J., &Waldorp, L. (2006). Editors’ introduction.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,50, 99–100.
Zaki, S. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Stanton, R. D., &Cohen, A. L. (2003). Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: A reassessment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1160–1173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
All authors were supported by NIH Grant R01-MH57472. D.J.N. was also supported by Australian Research Council Grant DP-0773794 and a grant from the Office of Research at Ohio State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myung, J.I., Pitt, M.A. & Navarro, D.J. Does response scaling cause the generalized context model to mimic a prototype model?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 1043–1050 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193089
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193089