Abstract
We provide objective data concerning the age of acquisition (AoA) of words from 202 Italian children 34–69 months of age. We investigated picture naming with 80 concrete words belonging to eight semantic categories that are included in a widely used battery for the study of naming and semantic memory. For each word, we calculated three different indices: two directly expressing the age at which a picture was given the correct name by at least 75% of the subjects, and one expressing the overall percentage of our children who were correct in the task. (For the latter index, we provide separate values for boys and girls.) The correlation between objective indices of AoA and adult estimates culled from the literature was not very high. Moreover, objective indices showed low correlations with frequency and familiarity, in contrast to adult ratings. We conclude that adult estimates of AoA present validity problems and should be used with caution. The full set of stimuli is available at www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese, E., Capitani, E., Barbarotto, R., &Laiacona, M. (2000). Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender.Cortex,36, 733–746.
Axia, G. (1995).TPL: Test del primo linguaggio. Manuale. Florence: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Barca, L., Burani, C., &Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 424–434.
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 560–585.
Bloom, P. (2000).How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Borgo, F., &Shallice, T. (2001). When living things and other “sensoryquality” categories behave in the same fashion: A novel categoryspecific effect.Neurocase,7, 201–220.
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., &Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of category-specific deficits? A critical review of clinical evidence.Cognitive Neuropsychology,20, 213–261.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 85–95.
Caselli, M. C., &Casadio, P. (1995).Il primo vocabolario del bambino: Guida all’uso del Questionario MacArthur per la valutazione della comunicazione e del linguaggio nei primi anni di vita. Milan: Angeli.
Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer, B., &Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,15, 209–245.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review,93, 283–321.
Ellis, A. W., &Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 515–523.
Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., &Capitani, E. (2005). Animals recover but plant life knowledge is still impaired 10 years after herpetic encephalitis: The long-term follow-up of a patient.Cognitive Neuropsychology,22, 78–94.
Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., Trivelli, C., &Capitani, E. (1993). Dissociazioni semantiche intercategoriali: Descrizione di una batteria standardizzata e dati normativi.Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria,54, 209–248.
Lotto, L., Dell’Acqua, R., &Job, R. (2001). Le figure PD/DPSS: Misure di accordo sul nome, tipicità, familiarità, età di acquisizione e tempi di denominazione per 266 figure.Giornale Italiano di Psicologia,28, 193–207.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.
Nisi, M., Longoni, A. M., &Snodgrass, J. G. (2000). Misure italiane per l’accordo sul nome, familiarità ed età di acquisizione, per le 260 figure di Snodgrass e Vanderwart (1980).Giornale Italiano di Psicologia,27, 205–220.
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,17, 273–281.
Pind, J., Jónsdóttir, H., Tryggvadóttir, H. B., &Jónsson, F. (2000). Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,41, 41–48.
Piñeiro, A., &Manzano, M. (2000). A lexical database for Spanishspeaking children.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 616–628.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Samson, D., &Pillon, A. (2003). A case of impaired knowledge for fruit and vegetables.Cognitive Neuropsychology,20, 373–400.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Silveri, M. C., Gainotti, G., Perani, D., Cappelletti, J. Y., Carbone, G., &Fazio, F. (1997). Naming deficit for non-living items: Neuropsychological and PET study.Neuropsychologia,35, 359–367.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Willmes, K. (1998). Methodological and statistical considerations in cognitive neurolinguistics. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.),Handbook of neurolinguistics (pp. 58–70). San Diego: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbarotto, R., Laiacona, M. & Capitani, E. Objective versus estimated age of word acquisition: A study of 202 Italian children. Behavior Research Methods 37, 644–650 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192735
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192735