Abstract
When identifying two targets presented in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, one’s accuracy on the second target is reduced if it is presented shortly (within 500 msec) after the first target—an attentional blink (AB). Individuals differ greatly in the size of their AB. One way to learn about the AB is to understand what underlies these individual differences. Recent studies have suggested that when a broadened or diffused attentional state is induced, the AB deficit can be attenuated. The present study examined whether natural (dispositional) individual differences in focus and diffusion of attention as assessed by the global/local task could predict performance on the AB task. Performance that was consistent with diffusion correlated negatively with AB size, and performance that was consistent with focusing correlated positively with AB size, showing that dispositional focus and diffusion of attention can predict individual differences in the AB. These findings are consistent with the Olivers and Nieuwenhuis (2006) overinvestment hypothesis.
Article PDF
References
Arend, I., Johnston, S., & Shapiro, K. [L.] (2006). Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 600–607.
Arnell, K. M., Stokes, K. A., MacLean, M. H., & Gicante, C. (2010). Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity. Psychological Research, 74, 1–11.
Arnell, K. M., & Stubitz, S. M. (in press). Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory. Psychological Research.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109
Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M. A., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051–1057.
Davidoff, J., Fonteneau, E., & Fagot, J. (2008). Local and global processing: Observations from a remote culture. Cognition, 108, 702–709. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.004
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J.-I., Ghorashi, S. M. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200. doi:10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x
Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 343–353. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2008). Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink. PLoS ONE, 3, e3330. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003330
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1683–1700. doi:10.3758/APP.71.8.1683
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238
Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00406
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.” Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225–231.
MacLean, M. H., Arnell, K. M., & Busseri, M. A. (in press). Dispositional affect predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Cognition & Emotion.
Moritz, S., & Wendt, M. (2006). Processing of local and global visual features in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 566–569. doi:10.1017/ S1355617706060577
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1–32. doi:10.1007/bf00309635
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863. doi:10.1037/ a0013395
Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16, 265–269. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01526.x
Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 364–379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.364
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383–388. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605198104
Scherf, K. S., Luna, B., Kimchi, R., Minshew, N., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Missing the big picture: Impaired development of global shape processing in autism. Autism, 1, 114–129.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296. doi:10.1016/ s1364-6613(97)01094-2
Stoesz, B. M., Jakobson, L. S., Kilgour, A. R., & Lewycky, S. T. (2007). Local processing advantage in musicians: Evidence from disembedding and constructional tasks. Music Perception, 25, 153–165. doi:10.1525/mp.2007.25.2.153
Taatgen, N. A., Juvina, I., Schipper, M., Borst, J. P., & Martens, S. (2009). Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 1–29. doi:10.1016/ j.cogpsych.2008.12.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was funded by grants from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the Ontario Innovation Trust (OIT) to K.M.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dale, G., Arnell, K.M. Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 602–606 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.602
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.602