Abstract
It has repeatedly been shown that the time and accuracy of recognizing a word depend strongly on where in the word the eye is fixating. Word-recognition performance is maximal when the eye fixates a region near the word’s center, and decreases to both sides of this “optimal viewing position.” The reason for this phenomenon is assumed to be the strong drop-off of visual acuity: the visibility of letters decreases with increasing eccentricity from fixation location. Consequently, fewer letters can be identified when the beginning or ending of a word is fixated than when its center is fixated. The present study is a test of this visual acuity hypothesis. If the phenomenon is caused by letter visibility, then it should be sensitive to variations of visual conditions in which the letters are presented. By increasing the interletter distances of the word(e.g.,a_t_t_e_m_ p_ t), letter visibility was decreased. As expected from our hypothesis, the viewing-position effect became more exaggerated. An additional experiment showed that destroying word-shape information (e.g., aTtEmPt) decreased overall word-recognition performance but had no influence on the viewingposition effect. Varying the viewing position in words might thus be used as a paradigm, allowing one to separate out the contribution of letter information and supraletter information to word recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, P. A., &Madden, D. J. (1990). Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 48–64.
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.Nature,226, 177–178.
Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words.Vision Research,13, 767–782.
Bouma, H. (1978). Visual search in reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention & performance VII (pp. 115–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bouma, H., &Legein, C. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers.Neuro-psychologia,15, 69–80.
Brysbaert, M., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1988). Collosal transmission in reading. In G. Lüer, U. Lass, & F. Shallo-Hoffmann (Eds.),Eye movement research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 246–266). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Campbell, A. J., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (1980). On familiarity effects in visual information processing.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 134–154.
Cattell, J. M. (1885). Über die Zeit der Erkennung und Benennung von Schriftzeichen, Bildern und Farben.Philosophische Studien,2, 635–650.
Erdmann, B., &Dodge, R. (1898).Psychologische Untersuchungen über das Lesen auf experimenteller Grundlage. Halle: Niemeyer.
Hagenzieker, M. P., Van Der Heuoen, A. H. C., &Hagenaar, R. (1990). Thetime courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,52, 13–21.
Healy, A. F., Ouver, W. L., &Mcnamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 279–290.
Jacobs, R. J. (1979). Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.Vision Research,9, 1187–1196.
Korte, W. (1923). Über die Gestaltauffassung im indirektem Sehen.Zeitschrift jür Psychologie,93, 17–82.
Mcclelland, J. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and non-words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 80–91.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., &Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word.Perception & Psychopnysics,46, 245–253.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,8, 365–368.
Meier, H. (1964).Deutsche Sprachstatistik (Vol. 2). Hildesbeim: Georg Olms.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Marchetti, F. M., &,Campbell, A. J. (1982). Blank characters in tachistoscopic recognition: Space has both a symbolic and a sensory role.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 559–575.
Nazir, T. A. (1991). On the role of refixations in letter strings: The influence of oculomotor factors.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 373–389.
Nazir, T. A. (in press). On the relation between the optimal and the preferred viewing position in words during reading. In J. v. Rens-bergen & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.),Studies in visual information processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Nazir, T. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Jacobs, A. M. (1991). On words and their letters.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 171–174.
Olzak, L. A., &Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial pattern. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 7:1–7:56). New York: Wiley.
O’Regan, J. K. (1989). Visual acuity, lexical structure, and eye movements in word recognition. In B. Elsendoorn & H. Bouma (Eds.),Working models of human perception (pp. 261–292). London: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (Reviews of Oculomotor Research, Vol. 4, pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
O’Regan, J. K., &Jacobs, A. M. (1992). The optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &:Performance,18, 185–197.
O’Regan, J. K., &Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention &:performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 363–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., &Brugaillére, B.é (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 250–257.
Pollatsek, A., Bowzky, S., Well, A. D., &Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.Brain & Language,14, 174–180.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., &Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 537–544.
Rudnicky, A. I., &Kolers, P. A. (1984). Size and case of type as stimuli in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 231–249.
Underwood, N. R., &McConkie, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading.Reading Research Quarterly,20, 153–162.
Vitu, F. (1991). The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 58–75.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., &Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing p0sition in reading isolated words and continuous texts.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 583–600.
Zeitler, J. (1900). Tachistoskopische Untersuchungen über das Lesen.Philosophische Studien,16, 380–463.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to O. Heller and A. Jacobs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nazir, T.A., Heller, D. & Sussmann, C. Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 315–328 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209148
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209148