Abstract
Magnitude comparison of single digits is robustly characterized by a distance effect (close numbers are more difficult to compare than numbers further apart) and a size effect (for a given distance, comparison difficulty increases with increasing size). The distance effect indicates access to the mental number line (Dehaene, 1997), and the size effect is usually interpreted as indicating that the mental number line represents larger numbers more vaguely than smaller ones. In contrast, we have argued earlier (Verguts, Fias, & Stevens, 2005) that for symbolic numbers (Arabic or verbal notation), the size effect does not originate from the mental number line but, instead, originates from mappings to relevant output components that are specific for magnitude comparison. If the latter is true, it should be possible to dissociate the distance effect from the size effect in tasks other than magnitude comparison. In two experiments, we observed a robust distance effect insame/different judgments, which implies access to the mental number line. Yet the size effect was absent. Consistent with our prediction, this finding establishes a dissociation between the size effect and the distance effect.
Article PDF
References
Campbell, J. I. D., &Clark, J. M. (1988). An encoding-complex view of cognitive processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 204–214.
Carey, S. (2001). Cognitive foundations of arithmetic: Evolution and ontogenesis [Review of the bookThe number sense: How the mind creates mathematics].Mind & Language,16, 37–55.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition,44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S. (1997).The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2001). Author’s response: Is number sense a patchwork?Mind & Language,16, 89–100.
Dehaene, S., &Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 314–326.
Dehaene, S., &Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words.Cognition,43, 1–29.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., &Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing.Cognitive Neuropsychology,20, 487–506.
Fias, W., &Verguts, T. (2004). The mental number line: Exact and approximate.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 447–448.
Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.Cognition,44, 43–74.
Hale, S., &Jansen, J. (1994). Global processing-time coefficients characterize individual and group differences in cognitive speed.Psychological Science,5, 384–389.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit numerals address the same semantic number line.Cognition,72, 191–201.
Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2002). Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 107–112.
Schwarz, W., &Stein, F. (1998). On the temporal dynamics of digit comparison processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1275–1293.
Verguts, T., &De Moor, W. (2005). Two-digit comparison: Decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?Experimental Psychology,52, 195–200.
Verguts, T., &Fias, W. (2004). Numerical representations in animals and humans: A neural model.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 1493–1504.
Verguts, T., Fias, W., &Stevens, M. (2005). A model of exact smallnumber representation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 66–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Our work was supported by Grant G.0188.04 from the Fund of Scientific Research-Flanders. The second author’s work was also supported by Grant 12053101 of the Special Research Fund of Ghent University to André Vandierendonck and Wim Fias.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verguts, T., Van Opstal, F. Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 925–930 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196787
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196787