아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자

@article{ART002544127},
author={ 윤교찬 },
title={아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자},
journal={영어영문학21},
issn={1738-4052},
year={2019},
volume={32},
number={4},
pages={119-136},
doi={10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006}

TY - JOUR
AU - 윤교찬
TI - 아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자
T2 - 영어영문학21
PY - 2019
VL - 32
IS - 4
PB - 21세기영어영문학회
SP - 119-136
SN - 1738-4052
AB - The main purpose of this paper is to examine the philosophical archaeology of George Agamben, and to see how Foucault’s and Benjamin’s idea of historical a priori affect or intercommunicate with Agamben’s philosophical archaeology. Agamben mentions that Kant first named “philosophical archaeology” for his study of philosophical history of philosophy, and its main ideas such as the historical apriori is at the basis of Nietzsche and Foucault. Philosophical archaeology differs from the traditional meaning of archaeology in that it concerns not with the chronological development of history but with the concept of the historical apriori. And the meaning of origin, “arche,” which philosophical archaeology searches for, is nothing to do with the chronologically most ancient, the archaic origin. Historical apriori and the arche are inscribed within a history and that can only constitute itself a posteriori with respect to this history and what it searches for is not the origin but the moment of rising, or emergence. Walter Benjamin also shows something similar in his concept of history, in the monadological structure of the historical object, and in the idea of “historical apocatastasis.” We also see that the paradoxical nature of the concept of the historical apriori is found in Agamben’s main studies on ‘homo sacre’ and ‘potentiality.’
KW - Agamben, arche, Benjamin, Foucault, genealogy, historical apriori, philosophical archaeology
DO - 10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006
ER -

윤교찬 (2019). 아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자. 영어영문학21, 32( 4), 119- 136.

윤교찬 . 2019, “아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자”, 영어영문학21, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 119-136. Available from: doi:10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006

윤교찬 “아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자” 영어영문학21 32.4 pp. 119-136 (2019): 119.

윤교찬 . 아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자 영어영문학21 [Internet]. 2019; 32( 4), : 119-136. Available from: doi:10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006

윤교찬 . “아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자” 영어영문학21 32, no.4 (2019): 119-136. doi: 10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

아감벤의 철학적 고고학, 그리고 푸코와 벤야민의 그림자

영어영문학21

약어 : 영어영문학21

2019, vol.32, no.4, pp.119 - 136

DOI : 10.35771/engdoi.2019.32.4.006

발행기관 : 21세기영어영문학회

연구분야 : 영어와문학

윤교찬¹

¹한남대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

The main purpose of this paper is to examine the philosophical archaeology of George Agamben, and to see how Foucault’s and Benjamin’s idea of historical a priori affect or intercommunicate with Agamben’s philosophical archaeology. Agamben mentions that Kant first named “philosophical archaeology” for his study of philosophical history of philosophy, and its main ideas such as the historical apriori is at the basis of Nietzsche and Foucault. Philosophical archaeology differs from the traditional meaning of archaeology in that it concerns not with the chronological development of history but with the concept of the historical apriori. And the meaning of origin, “arche,” which philosophical archaeology searches for, is nothing to do with the chronologically most ancient, the archaic origin. Historical apriori and the arche are inscribed within a history and that can only constitute itself a posteriori with respect to this history and what it searches for is not the origin but the moment of rising, or emergence. Walter Benjamin also shows something similar in his concept of history, in the monadological structure of the historical object, and in the idea of “historical apocatastasis.” We also see that the paradoxical nature of the concept of the historical apriori is found in Agamben’s main studies on ‘homo sacre’ and ‘potentiality.’

키워드

Agamben, arche, Benjamin, Foucault, genealogy, historical apriori, philosophical archaeology

참고문헌(18)

[단행본] 들뢰즈, 질 / 1975 / 카프카—소수적인 문학을 위하여 / 동문선
[단행본] 모스, 수잔 벅 / 1991 / 발터 벤야민과 아케이드 프로젝트 / 문학동네
[단행본] 벤야민, 발터 / 2012 / 발터 벤야민 선집 5: 역사의 개념에 대하여, 폭력비판을 위하여, 초현실주의 외 / 길
[단행본] 아감벤, 조르조 / 2014 / 사물의 표시—방법에 관하여 / 난장
[단행본] 아감벤, 조르조 / 2010 / 장치란 무엇인가? 장치학을 위한 서론 / 난장
[학술지] 윤교찬 / 2016 / 바울의 ‘지금의 시간’, 벤야민의 ‘지금시간’, 그리고 아감벤의 ‘철학적 고고학’ / 현대영어영문학 60 (4) : 221 ~ 243
[단행본] 푸코, 미셸 / 1992 / 미셸 푸코—‘광기의 역사’에서 ‘성의 역사’까지 / 민음사
[단행본] 푸코, 미셸 / 1993 / 말과 사물 / 민음사
[단행본] 푸코, 미셸 / 2015 / 사회를 보호해야 한다—콜레주드프랑스 강의 1975∼76년 / 난장
[단행본] Agamben, Giorgio / 2009 / The Signature of All Things: On Method / Zone
[단행본] Agamben, Giorgio / 2007 / Profanations / Zone : 73 ~ 92
[단행본] Agamben, Giorgio / 2009 / The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to Romans / Stanford UP
[단행본] Agamben, Giorgio / 2009 / What is an Apparatus? and Other Essays / Stanford UP : 262 ~ 287
[단행본] Foucault, Michel / 1984 / The Foucault Reader / Pantheon : 76 ~ 100
[단행본] Foucault, Michel / 2001 / The Order of Things: Archaeology of the Human Sciences / Routledge
[단행본] Foucault, Michel / 1997 / Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College De France. 1975-76 / Picador
[학술지] Howard, Stephen / 2018 / Archaeology and/or Genealogy: Agamben’s Transformation of Foucauldian Method / Journal of Italian Philosophy 1 : 27 ~ 45
[학술지] McQuillan, Colin / 2010 / Philosophical Archaeology in Kant, Foucault, and Agamben / Parrhesia 10 : 39 ~ 49