Peer-reviewed articles 9,600 +


Title: QUALIFICATION OF THE REQUEST TO TAKE OVER CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION
QUALIFICATION OF THE REQUEST TO TAKE OVER CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION
PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Anca-Lelia Lorincz; Adriana Iuliana Stancu
10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s02.015
10.35603/sws.iscss.2022
2682-9959
978-3-903438-04-0
English language
9
1
• Prof. Hab. Dr. Sc. Iryna Zinkiv, UKRAINE 
• Prof. DSc. Ojars Sparitis, LATVIA
SOCIAL SCIENCES: Section Law
As a manifestation of the ne bis in idem principle at the interstate level, the transfer of criminal proceedings is one of the forms of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters that avoids the conduct of parallel proceedings that could lead to prosecution, trial and even conviction a person in different states for committing the same act. Starting from a non-unitary practice aspect regarding the qualification of requests to take proceedings (in the sense of requests to take criminal proceedings or requests to take trial), this study addresses the issue of transfer of proceedings in criminal matters, as regulated in international legal instruments and in the Romanian special law on international judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Law no. 302/2004, republished in 2019). The research methods used in the study are: documentation, observation and scientific analysis (comparative analysis of both legal regulations and solutions of judicial practice). The paper aims to contribute to the uniform interpretation and application of the provisions on the transfer of proceedings in criminal matters, in particular in the relationship between the Member States of the European Union, given that the regulation of those procedures in national legislations is not always similar. The conclusion is that the relations of judicial cooperation in criminal matters between the Member States of the European Union, including through the transfer of criminal proceedings, must be based on mutual trust in internal judicial systems, as a corollary of the principle of mutual recognition.
[1] Chiri?a R., Conven?ia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului, Comentarii ?i explica?ii, Ed. CH Beck, Bucure?ti, (European Convention on Human Rights. Comments and Explanations, first volume, C.H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest), 2007, p. 5.
[2] Case of Horgiag v. Romania, https://jurisprudentacedo.com/Horgiag-c.-RomaniaNon-bis-in-idem.-Domeniul-de-incidenta.html, accessed on 30.07.2022.
[3] Case of Stavila v. Romania, (Application no. 23126/16), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["Stavila%20v.%20Romania"],"documentcoll ectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-215921"]} accessed on 30.07.2022
[4] Case of W.F. v. Austria, www.hudoc.com, accessed on 30.07.2022.
[5] Resoluciones de los Congresos de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Penal (1926-2009), Nouvelles Etudes Penales No 23/2012, edicion a cargo de Jose Luis de la Cuesta, Isidoro Blanco Cordero, imprime en France, pp 223-225;
[6] Mihail Udroiu, Ovidiu Predescu, Protec?ia europeana a drepturilor omului ?i procesul penal roman, Editura C.H. Beck, Bucure?ti (European protection of human rights and the Romanian criminal process, C.H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest), 2008, p 932;
[7] Florin-Razvan Radu, Drept european ?i interna?ional penal, Editura C.H. Beck, Bucure?ti (European and international criminal law, C.H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest), 2013, pp 79, 81-82, 87-88;
[8] Andre Klip, Jurisdiction and Transnational Ne Bis In Idem in Prosecution of Transnational Crimes, in The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, edited by Oxford University Press, New York, 2019, pp 540-541;
[9] REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation by the Member States of Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA of 30 November 2009 on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings, available on https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0313&from=RO, accessed on July 15, 2022;
[10] Minutes of the meeting of the chief prosecutors of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the National Anticorruption Directorate, the Directorate for the Investigation of Organized Crime and Terrorism and the prosecutor's offices attached to the courts of appeal (Bucharest, March 9-10, 2020), p 76, available on https://inm-lex.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/repertoriu-drept-procesual-penal.pdf, p 486, accessed on July 20, 2022;
[11] Minutes of the meeting of the presidents of the criminal sections of the High Court of Cassation and Justice and of the courts of appeal (Bucharest, December 18, 2020), p 100, available on https://inm-lex.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/repertoriu-dreptprocesual-penal.pdf, p 486, accessed on July 20, 2022.
This paper is financed from the funds of the research project carried out by the University "Dunarea de Jos" from Galati, financing contract no. 14713/10.05.2022.
conference
https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s02.015
Download PDF
Proceedings of 9th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2022
9th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2022, 24 - 27 August, 2022
Proceedings Paper
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences-ISCSS
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad S
115-122
24 - 27 August, 2022
website
4887
transfer of criminal proceedings, unification of judicial practice, international judicial cooperation in criminal matters, mutual trust