이 글은 이이의 ‘획전역(畫前易)’ 개념을 통해 드러나는 태극의 정치적 의미를 논증하는 글이다. (1) 이이가 ‘획전역’ 개념을 통해 드러내는 ‘태극’이 유가실천론, 즉 제왕학 수립에 끼쳤던 인식론적 구조를 드러내고, 나아가 (2) ‘획전역’의 이러한 인식론적 의의가 이이의 정치적 실천에 끼친 영향을 논증하고, 이를 바탕으로, (3) 이이의 ‘획전역’ 개념이 지닌 정치적 특징을 랑시에르의 정치학 개념에 비추어 규정함으로써 이이의 역학에서 제시하는 ‘획전역’ 개념이 지니는 정치적 위상을 확인하고, 최종적으로 (4) 이이의 ‘획전역’ 개념이 오늘날에 어떤 정치적 활용도가 있을지를 논의한다.
In this paper, I aim at a purpose on arguing for Leeyi’s political meanings of Tai-ji, which be exposed through his concept Pre-hexagram-Yi. For achieving this purpose, (1) I will discuss on his political meanings of the concept Tai-ji through keeping up with his concept pre-hexagram which influence on recognition process of structuring kingly-learnings in Confucian practice. (2) furthermore, also examine what this cognitional process about Leeyi’s pre-hexagram have affected on his political practice, (3) standing on this basis, I will confirm political status of Leeyi’s concept pre-hexagram through comparing Leeyi’s political meaning with Rancière’s concept ‘policitics’. (4) finally, I also identify what political availability nowadays will be in the Leeyi’s concept pre-hexagram.
In this paper, I aim at a purpose on arguing for Leeyi’s political meanings of Tai-ji, which be exposed through his concept Pre-hexagram-Yi. For achieving this purpose, (1) I will discuss on his political meanings of the concept Tai-ji through keeping up with his concept pre-hexagram which influence on recognition process of structuring kingly-learnings in Confucian practice. (2) furthermore, also examine what this cognitional process about Leeyi’s pre-hexagram have affected on his political practice, (3) standing on this basis, I will confirm political status of Leeyi’s concept pre-hexagram through comparing Leeyi’s political meaning with Rancière’s concept ‘policitics’. (4) finally, I also identify what political availability nowadays will be in the Leeyi’s concept pre-hexagram.