메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터

주제분류

정기구독(개인)

소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.

회원혜택

로그인 회원이 가져갈 수 있는 혜택들을 확인하고 이용하세요.

아카루트

학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.

영문교정

영문 논문 작성에 도움을 드리기 위해, 영문 교정 서비스를
지원하고 있어요.

고객센터 제휴문의

...

저널정보

저자정보

표지
이용수
내서재
2
내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록·키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine teachers" perceptions and present a direction as a teaching method for educational effects, satisfaction, and substantiality in elementary school physical education classes to which blended running was applied. Five fifth grade elementary school teachers headquartered in Seoul were selected as research participants and had a deep interview. After recording and transcribing the interview materials, the concept was derived by iterative checking, and categorized and themed. In the research, the teachers who participated in the research had a low level of understanding of blended running, and the community of teachers was utilized, and the theory and utilization method of blended learning was made with reasonable efforts such as participation in training and discussions between fellow teachers. Was mastered. The study participants expressed a positive opinion that the quality of the lesson could be improved by structuring the lesson through the physical education lesson to which the blended running was applied, and striving to achieve the learning goal and stimulate it. However, there were also side effects. Due to the characteristics of blended learning in parallel with online lessons and school attendance lessons, it was not uncommon for students to accept lessons in a passive and passive manner, and it became clear that feedback and evaluation for learning were difficult. Based on this, we proposed the direction of a follow-up survey of physical education classes using blended running.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-692-001861970