Methods Inf Med 2009; 48(05): 493-501
DOI: 10.3414/ME0566
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Virtual Reality Simulator for the Training of Lumbar Punctures

M. Färber
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
F. Hummel
2   Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
C. Gerloff
2   Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
H. Handels
1   Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 24 April 2008

accepted: 31 March 2009

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: Lumbar puncture (LP) is performed by inserting a needle into the spinal canal to extract cerebrospinal fluid for diagnostic purposes. A virtual reality (VR) lumbar puncture simulator based on real patient data has been developed and evaluated.

Methods: A haptic device with six degrees of freedom is used to steer the virtual needle and to generate feedback forces that resist needle insertion and rotation. An extended haptic volume-rendering approach is applied to calculate forces. This approach combines information from segmented data and original CT data which contributes density information in unsegmented image structures. The system has been evaluated in a pilot study with medical students. Participants of two groups, a training and a control group, completed different first training protocols. User performance has been recorded during a second training session to measure the training effect. Furthermore user acceptance has been evaluated in a questionnaire using a 6-point Likert scale with eight items.

Results: Forty-two medical students in two groups evaluated the system. Trained users performed better than less trained users (an average of 39% successfully completed virtual LPs compared to 30%). Findings of the questionnaire show that the simulator is very well accepted. E.g. the users agree that training with such a simulator is useful (Likert grade of 1.5 ± 0.7 with 1 = “strongly agree” and 6 = “strongly disagree”).

Conclusions: Results show that the VR LP simulator gives a realistic haptic and visual impression of the needle insertion and enables new insights into the anatomy of the lumbar region. It offers a new way for increasing skills of students and young residents before applying an LP in patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gorelick PB, Biller J. Lumbar puncture. Technique, indications, and complications. Postgrad Med 1986; 79 (08) 257-268.
  • 2 Roos KL. Lumbar puncture. Semin Neurol 2003; 23 (01) 105-114.
  • 3 Bott OJ, Teistler M, Duwenkamp C, Wagner M, Marschollek M, Plischke M. et al. VirtX – evaluation of a computer-based training system for mobile C-arm systems in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (03) 270-278.
  • 4 Kanumuri P, Ganai S, Wohaibi EM, Bush RW, Grow DR, Seymour NE. Virtual reality and computer-enhanced training devices equally improve laparoscopic surgical skill in novices. JSLS. 2008; 12 (03) 219-226.
  • 5 Handels H, Ehrhardt J. Medical image computing for computer-supported diagnostics and therapy. Advances and perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 11-17.
  • 6 Singh SK, Bostrom M, Popa DO, Wiley CW. Design of an interactive lumbar puncture simulator with tactile feedback. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1994; 1994 pp 1734-1739.
  • 7 Ra JB, Kwon SM, Kim JK, Yi J, Kim KH, Park HW. et al. Spine needle biopsy simulator using visual and force feedback. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7 (06) 353-363.
  • 8 Cheng Z, Wang H-s, Min Y-j, Yan Z-g, Hong ZT, Zhuang T-g. Preliminary study on force feedback of acupuncture in virtual reality based on the visible human. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 2007; 31 (01) 5-9.
  • 9 Leung K-M, Heng P-A, Sun H, Wong T-T. A haptic needle manipulation simulator for Chinese acupuncture. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 187-189.
  • 10 Forest C, Comas O, Vaysière C, Soler L, Marescaux J. Ultrasound and needle insertion simulators built on real patient-based data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 125: 136-139.
  • 11 Dang T, Annaswamy TM, Srinivasan MA. Development and evaluation of an epidural injection simulator with force feedback for medical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 81: 97-102.
  • 12 Dreifaldt U, Kulcsar Z, Gallagher P. Exploring haptics as a tool to improve training of medical doctors in the procedure of spinal anaesthetics. Eurohaptics; 2006; Paris; 2006
  • 13 Gorman P, Krummel T, Webster R, Smith M, Hutchens D. A prototype haptic lumbar puncture simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 70: 106-109.
  • 14 Hiemenz L, Stredney D, Schmalbrock P. Development of the force-feedback model for an epidural needle insertion simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998; 50: 272-277.
  • 15 Marti G, Rouiller P, Grange S, Baur C. Biopsy navigator: a smart haptic interface for interventional radiological gestures. International Congress Series 2003; 1256: 788-793.
  • 16 Lathan C, Cleary K, Traynor L. Human-Centered Design of a Spine Biopsy Simulator and the Effects of Visual and Force Feedback on Path-Tracking Performance. Presence: Teleoper Virtual Environ 2000; 9 (04) 337-449.
  • 17 Färber M, Heller J, Handels H. Simulation and training of lumbar punctures using haptic volume rendering and a 6DOF haptic device. In: Cleary KR, Miga MI. editors. SPIE Medical Imaging 2007;. 2007 p 65090F.
  • 18 Färber M, Heller J, Hummel F, Gerloff C, Handels H. Virtual Reality based Training of Lumbar Punctures using a 6DOF Haptic Device. In: Buzug T, Holz D, Weber W, Bongartz J, Kohl-Bareis M, Hart-mann U. editors. Advances in Medical Engineering;. 2007; Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2007. pp 236-240.
  • 19 Färber M, Hoeborn E, Dalek D, Hummel F, Gerloff C, Bohn CA. et al. Training and evaluation of lumbar punctures in a VR-environment using a 6DOF haptic device. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 132: 112-114.
  • 20 Ruspini DC, Kolarov K, Khatib O. The Haptic Display of Complex Graphical Environments. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings); 1997; 1997 pp 345-352.
  • 21 Zilles CB, Salisbury JK. A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. IROS ’95: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems – Volume 3; 1995; Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society; 1995. p 3146
  • 22 Lundin K, Gudmundsson B, Ynnerman A. General Proxy-based Haptics for Volume Visualization. World Haptics Conference; 2005; Pisa, Italy; 2005 pp 557-560.
  • 23 Lundin K, Ynnerman A, Gudmundsson B. Proxy-based Haptic Feedback from Volumetric Density Data. Eurohaptics Conference; 2002; University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 2002 pp 104-109.
  • 24 Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG. The Visible Human Dataset: the anatomical platform for human simulation. Anat Rec 1998; 253 (02) 49-57.
  • 25 Park JS, Chung MS, Hwang SB, Lee YS, Har D-H, Park HS. Visible Korean human: improved serially sectioned images of the entire body. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24 (03) 352-360.
  • 26 Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH ’87: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques; 1987; New York, NY, USA: ACM; 1987 pp 163-169.
  • 27 Hor K-w, Tran D, Kamani A, Lessoway V, Rohling R. Instrumentation for Epidural Anesthesia. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2007; 2007 pp 918-925.
  • 28 Magill J, Anderson B, Anderson G, Hess P, Pratt S. Multi-axis Mechanical Simulator for Epidural Needle Insertion. Medical Simulation; 2004 pp 267-276.
  • 29 DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE. Interactive simulation of needle insertion models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52 (07) 1167-1179.