Next Article in Journal
A Gas Leakage Localization Method Based on a Virtual Ultrasonic Sensor Array
Next Article in Special Issue
A Separated Receptor/Transducer Scheme as Strategy to Enhance the Gas Sensing Performance Using Hematite–Carbon Nanotube Composite
Previous Article in Journal
An Intelligent Fire Warning Application Using IoT and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conductometric Sensing with Individual InAs Nanowires
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 19
Issue 14
10.3390/s19143151
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cu/CuO@ZnO Hollow Nanofiber Gas Sensor: Effect of Hollow Nanofiber Structure and P–N Junction on Operating Temperature and Sensitivity

by
Sung-Ho Hwang
,
Young Kwang Kim
,
Seong Hui Hong
and
Sang Kyoo Lim
*
Smart Textile Convergence Research Group, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(14), 3151; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143151
Submission received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 5 July 2019 / Accepted: 15 July 2019 / Published: 17 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials based Gas Sensors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
For the fast and easy detection of carbon monoxide (CO) gas, it was necessary to develop a CO gas sensor to operate in low temperatures. Herein, a novel Cu/CuO-decorated ZnO hollow nanofiber was prepared with the electrospinning, calcination, and photodeposition methods. In the presence of 100 ppm CO gas, the Cu/CuO-photodeposited ZnO hollow nanofiber (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF) showed twice higher sensitivity than that of pure ZnO nanofiber at a relatively low working temperature of 300 °C. The hollow structure and p–n junction between Cu/CuO and ZnO would be considered to contribute to the enhancement of sensitivity to CO gas at 300 °C due to the improved specific surface area and efficient electron transfer.

1. Introduction

Carbon monoxide (CO), a dangerous byproduct of the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, adversely affects human health because its high reactivity with blood erythrocytes results in oxygen deficiency in the body [1,2]. To monitor the toxic gas, a gas sensor is imperative due to concerns for industry safety requirements. With this in mind, metal oxide (SnO2, WO3, In2O3, ZnO, Fe2O3, and TiO2)-based gas sensors were intensively investigated for detecting hazardous gases (CO and H2S) and identifying their mechanism [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. For example, the core mechanism of detecting H2S gas with a CuO/ZnO hybrid is destroying the p–n junction with the formation of metallic CuS in the presence of H2S gas [10]. On the other hand, in the case of CO gas, resistance changes by the oxidation of adsorbed CO through accepting the adsorbed oxygen ions at CuO/ZnO interfaces [11]. In this work, we focused on developing a CO gas sensor with good sensitivity, and ZnO was selected as the base material among the metal oxides because of its n-type nature and good thermal stability [12]. Another important issue is lowering the operating temperature of the sensor to improve durability and reduce the danger on account of high operating temperatures (~400 °C) [13,14]. For example, spike-shaped CuO/ZnO nanorods were developed for lowering the operating temperature of detecting 100 ppm of CO gas [15]. CuO-ZnO/Al2O3 ternary material that can operate at 175 °C was also developed to detect 200 ppm of CO gas [16].
In this study, two combined strategies, designing a hollow ZnO structure and controlling the depletion layer by metal oxide deposition, are suggested to reduce the operating temperature of the sensor. The hollow structure of ZnO has high potential for improving the gas response since hollow structures (inner-structure-controlled 1D nanostructure) would provide more active sites to adsorb CO gas, as well as gas-diffusion channels promoting faster electron transfer than other nanostructures [17,18]. The hollow structure can be prepared by three electrospinning strategies (coaxial, phase-separation, and fiber-template methods) [19,20,21]. The fiber-template method is more appropriate than the other strategies because fiber shell thickness and inner diameter are easily controlled by calcination. In addition, metal or metal oxide deposition can be applied straightforwardly on the rigid fiber template. It is well known that deposited metal nanoparticles help to adsorb oxygen molecules and then dissociate them on the surface of metal/metal oxide hybrid nanoparticles. These reactions improve gas sensitivity and charge transfer by reducing potential barriers at the grain boundaries. Thus, the depletion layer of the gas-sensing material, which can significantly affect gas sensitivity, was controlled by the formation of a p–n heterojunction through the photodeposition of a p-type metal oxide (CuO) on the surface of an n-type metal oxide (ZnO) [22]. With this in mind, in order to lower the operating temperature of the CO gas sensor with good sensitivity, new p–n heterojunction material was prepared. First, a polymeric solution containing Zn precursor was electrospun and annealed to obtain the ZnO hollow nanofiber. Second, Cu and CuO nanoparticles were photodeposited on the surface of the ZnO hollow nanofiber with different concentrations of a Cu precursor solution.

2. Materials and Methods

To design a CO gas sensor with a new structure, the ZnO hollow nanofiber was prepared with the electrospinning and calcination method, as previously reported [23,24]. Zinc acetate (ZnAc, Daejung, 99%, Korea) was dispersed in a 10 wt.% solution of polyacrylonitrile (PAN, Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); molar weight, 150,000)/N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, Aldrich, 99%) by stirring, and the mixture was sonicated to ensure good dispersion. The mass ratio of ZnAc to PAN was 1:1. A yellow viscous ZnAc/PAN gel was placed inside the syringe pump equipped with a 25-gauge stainless steel needle, and then was fed to the collector (distance between needle and collector was 15 cm) at a constant flow rate of 20 μL min−1 and electric field of 20 kV, which finally led to the webs of ZnAc/PAN nanofibers. To obtain ZnO hollow nanofibers, the webs of ZnAc/PAN nanofibers were placed in a box furnace and calcined in air at different temperatures (400, 500, 600, and 700 °C) for 4 h. Ramp rate was 5 °C min−1. As-prepared samples were denoted by ZnO NF-400, ZnO NF-500, ZnO NF-600 and ZnO NF-700, respectively.
To prepare a low-temperature-operated CO gas sensor, a combination of Cu and CuO particles were photodeposited on the ZnO hollow nanofiber using the Cu precursor, copper acetate (CuAc2, Aldrich, 99%) [25]. The amount of Cu and CuO on the ZnO hollow nanofibers was controlled by experimenting with different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1 mM) of CuAc2 in 10 vol.% of methanol (Daejung, 99%) aqueous solution. The as-prepared ZnO hollow-nanofiber (1 g L−1) samples were dispersed and stirred in CuAc2/methanol solutions for 30 min to allow the adsorption of Cu cations on the ZnO hollow-nanofiber surface. After that, the sample was exposed to an 8 W UVB lamp (λ = 365 nm) for 30 min to reduce Cu cations. Finally, different amounts of Cu- and CuO-photodeposited ZnO hollow nanofibers (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF) were obtained. The samples prepared by using 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mM of CuAc2 are denoted as Cu/CuO(0.1 mM)@ZnO HNF, Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF, and Cu/CuO(1 mM)@ZnO HNF, respectively.
Morphological and elemental-mapping images of the as-prepared ZnO NFs and Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs were obtained by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi, SU-8020, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-prepared samples were acquired with an X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Empyrean, 60 kV, Malvern, UK) using Cu–Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) and a quartz monochromator. A photoluminescence experiment was performed with a 325 nm He–Cd laser (Kimon, 1 K, 50 mW). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of samples were calculated from nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K (ASAP2020, Micrometrics). The effective surface areas were estimated at a relative pressure (P/P0) ranging from 0.06 to 1. The electrical conductivity of the samples was measured by using a 4-point probe system (AIT, CMT-SR2000N).
The sensor was fabricated by dropping ZnO NF or Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF gels on a sapphire substrate with prepatterned Pt electrodes. The ZnO NF or Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF gels were made by grinding 10 mg of ZnO NFs or Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs with 0.25 mL of deionized water in an agate mortar. A precise autopipette (Eppendorf) was then used to deposit the solution. After dropping 10 μL of ZnO NFs or Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs, the substrate was dried in air. The sensor element was heated at 400 °C for 1 h to prevent crystal growth at sensing temperatures (50–400 °C).
The properties of the ZnO NFs or Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs must be well-analyzed to optimize their characteristics for CO gas-sensing applications. Sensing measurements were performed on a computer-based testing apparatus (PXI-DAQ system, National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA), and gas concentration was controlled by a precalibrated mass-flow meter (Brooks 5850E, Hatfield, UK). A source measure unit (4200SCS, Keithley, Beaverton, OR, USA) was used for acquisition of the electrical signal, while a power supply (E3631A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed to bias the sensor’s built-in back heater. The gas response is defined as the percentage change in resistance of the sensor upon CO exposure ((Ra − Rg)/Ra) × 100 (%), where Ra and Rg are resistances in air and in the presence of CO, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. CO Gas Sensitivity of ZnO Hollow Nanofiber

3.1.1. Effect of Annealing Temperature and Time on ZnO Nanofiber Morphology

In CO gas-sensing tasks, controlling sensor surface area and pore-size distribution is crucial. They can be controlled by changing the morphology of the gas-sensing materials, so it was necessary to investigate the influence of fabrication conditions (e.g., annealing temperature and time) on the morphology of ZnO nanofibers. With this in mind, pristine ZnAc/PAN nanofibers were calcined to obtain ZnO hollow nanofibers with different temperatures (400 ~ 700 °C) and time (1 ~ 4 h). Then, the inner morphologies of the obtained nanofibers were compared.
At first, the cross-sectional view of ZnO NF-400 seems to be fully filled without hollowness (Figure 1a). However, a hollow structure was observed in all other samples, ZnO NF-500, ZnO NF-600, and ZnO NF-700 (Figure 1b–d). As shown in Figure 2, when the ZnO NF was calcined at 500 °C for 1 h, a narrow channel (diameter of 30 nm) inside ZnO NF was formed, and further calcination (2 ~ 4 h) seemed to make a larger cavity (darkest area of image) inside ZnO NFs in proportion with calcination time. According to the results of Figure 1 and Figure 2, it was confirmed that hollow nanofiber structures started to form in calcination at 500 °C for 2 h or longer. To investigate the elemental composition and crystallinity of as-prepared ZnO NFs, the XRD spectra of the samples are presented in Figure 3a. The XRD patterns of as-prepared samples reveal that all the calcined nanofibers were composed of ZnO, and it was found that the characteristic peak intensity of ZnO increased by raising the calcination temperature due to higher crystallinity (Figure 3a). Therefore, it could be understood that calcination at 500 °C or more for 2 h or longer formed a hollow inside the pristine nanofibers throughout the thermal decomposition of the PAN component within the pristine ZnAc/PAN nanofibers. As shown in Figure 2, according to the increase of calcination temperature, the calcined inner diameters of the nanofibers were increased, and the nanofiber simultaneously came to form an outer shell with the higher density of ZnO. The tendency of the hollow structure of the ZnO nanofibers was highly related to phase separation (called the bleed-out phenomenon), which is a gradient rearrangement of metal oxides during the calcination of nanofibers [26].

3.1.2. Effect of Calcination Temperature on ZnO Nanofiber Sensitivity

As described earlier, the CO gas sensitivity of ZnO nanofibers was evaluated by measuring resistance changes (Ra − Rg/Ra × 100 (%)), where Ra is sample resistance in air and Rg is sample resistance in CO gas), of ZnO nanofibers in different operating temperatures (25 ~ 450 °C). CO sensing of ZnO resulted from surface chemical reactions. The surface chemical reaction between the chemisorbed oxygen species and the adsorbed CO gas molecules led to the resistance variation of the gas-sensor material. Generally, sensitivity of semiconductor metal oxide sensors is reported to improve in proportion with the operating temperature due to more electron density in the conduction band but, beyond the optimal operating temperature, desorption of the target gas would prevail on such electronic contribution, resulting in sensitivity reduction [3]. From this point of view, it was necessary to evaluate the sensitivity of our samples to CO gas, and to determine the best among as-prepared ZnO nanofibers and its optimal operating temperature. In Figure 3b, the responses of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers to CO gas depending on temperature are depicted. The resistance of all samples decreased in the presence of CO gas compared with those in air. Among the as-prepared ZnO nanofibers, ZnO NF-500 showed the best response (81.9% for 100 ppm CO gas) at an operating temperature of 400 °C (Figure 3b). To further investigate the correlation between the surface characteristics and CO gas sensitivity of the ZnO NF samples, photoluminescence spectra were measured, as shown in Figure 3c. In the photoluminescence spectra of the ZnO nanofiber, it was reported that the long-wavelength emission bands were attributed to defective emissions [27]. Among these emission bands, green emission bands (500–550 nm) are often attributed to singly ionized oxygen vacancies and neutral oxygen vacancies located on the surface, although this assignment is controversial. Yellow emission bands (550–600 nm) and orange-red emission bands (600–700 nm) are typically attributed to interstitial oxygen located on the subsurface. From the Figure 3c, it was shown that ZnO NF-500 exhibited the largest integrated area of PL intensity with long wavelength emission bands, from 500 to 800 nm, which showed that these were the most oxygen vacancies and interstitial oxygens in ZnO NF-500. From closer examination of the morphology and photoluminescence spectra of the samples, the hollow structure and presence of surface defects and interstitial oxygen of ZnO NF-500 could be expected to be more beneficial in reacting with CO gas than other samples due to more active sites. In addition, the oxygen species can influence operating temperature, which is highly related to the gas sensitivity of the ZnO nanofibers. The oxygen species existed differently depending on temperature. O2− and O− ions can exist at 100–300 °C [5]. However, O2−, resulting in a larger resistance change than O2− or O−, can be chemisorbed on the inner and outer surface of ZnO NF-500 in >300 °C temperatures, which led to maximum gas sensitivity at 400 °C operating temperature. The ZnO NF-500 also showed excellent repeatability in CO gas response (Figure 3d). Therefore, we can assume that the optimal hollow structures of the ZnO nanofiber for CO gas sensing can be fabricated by calcination of a ZnAc/PAN nanofiber at 500 °C for 4 h.

3.2. CO Gas Sensitivity of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF

3.2.1. Effect of CuAc2 Concentration on ZnO Hollow-Nanofiber Morphology

As a second step to develop a CO gas sensor that can operate at lower temperatures, new p–n heterojunction materials (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF) were prepared by photodepositing Cu or CuO on the surface of ZnO NF-500. To determine the best fabrication condition of a metal-semiconductor hybrid for CO gas sensing, three different concentrations of CuAc2 solutions (1, 0.5, 0.1 mM) were used. The morphology and elemental composition of the Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. It was observed that Cu and CuO particles were deposited on the ZnO hollow nanofiber, showing different morphologies depending on the concentration of the Cu precursor solution. In Cu/CuO(0.1 mM)@ZnO HNF (Figure 4b), Cu and CuO with a seedlike shape started to form on the surface of the ZnO hollow nanofibers. In Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF (Figure 4c), Cu and CuO particles with a size of 50 nm were observed to be uniformly deposited on the ZnO hollow nanofibers. However, in Cu/CuO(1 mM)@ZnO HNF (Figure 4d), Cu and CuO particles seemed to largely be aggregated around the edge of the ZnO hollow nanofibers. The amounts of Cu in the samples increased with the increase of the concentration of Cu precursor solutions. The ratio of Cu/Zn, the amount of Cu in the sample divide by the amount of Zn in the sample, was increased by up to 0.41 for the Cu/CuO(1 mM)@ZnO HNF sample. This indicates that Cu and CuO hybrid nanoparticles were formed on the surface of ZnO HNF by the photodeposition process.
The components of the metal-semiconductor hybrids were also confirmed by XRD patterns (Figure 5). The XRD patterns of Cu and CuO in Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs consisted of three peaks at 42.3°, 61.45°, and 73.48°, which are indexed to the reflections from the Cu (111) plane, CuO (−113) plane, and CuO (311) plane, respectively [28,29]. All Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs exhibited the wurtzite structure (JCPDS NO. 36-1451) of ZnO [30]. EDX and XRD results demonstrated that Cu and CuO particles that formed on the surface of the ZnO hollow nanofiber were deposited in an amorphous phase with a seedlike shape in Cu/CuO(0.1 mM)@ZnO HNF, in well-crystallized phase in Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF, and in a highly aggregated phase in Cu/CuO(1 mM)@ZnO HNF. It is therefore thought that Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF would show the best sensitivity among them due to the best crystallinity and dispersion of Cu/CuO particles.

3.2.2. CO Gas Response of Cu/CuO-Photodeposited ZnO Hollow Nanofibers (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF)

Developing a gas sensor that operates in low temperatures is very important to reduce energy consumption and to ensure measuring safety. The gas-sensing mechanism and kinetics can be influenced by operating temperature. In this study, response of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs to 100 ppm CO were evaluated at different operating temperatures, as shown in Figure 6. All the Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs exhibited a higher response to CO gas than the ZnO HNFs under 300 °C, especially the highest in Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF. Moreover, it was confirmed that the response of Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF was around twice higher than that of ZnO NF-500 at 300 °C, and as much as that of ZnO NF-500 at 400 °C. As compared to other ZnO-based sensors for CO gas mentioned in the literature, which is shown in Table 2, the Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF showed a good response at 300 °C. To discuss the effect of Cu on the CO gas-sensing mechanism, it was necessary to identify the phase of Cu metal in Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF during CO gas sensing. Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of the Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF and the annealed ones. It was observed that the intensity of the Cu (111) peak was decreased but remained, and a CuO (022) peak was newly formed by the oxidation of the Cu metal in the XRD patterns of annealed ones. This indicated that the sample changed a phase by thermal oxidation during CO gas sensing in a high operating temperature. More importantly, the phase of the Cu metal could exist at the optimal operating temperature.
Some studies showed that a Cu site on the surface of ZnO allows to improve CO gas adsorption at low temperatures [33,35,36,37]. It was reported that when Cu/ZnO hybrids are exposed to CO molecules, CO molecules prefer to adsorb on the Cu metal to form bonds between CO and Cu. Then, adsorption leads to the improvement of CO reactivity [33]. In addition, the P–N junction of CuO@ZnO hybrids allows larger resistance change by changing the thickness of the electron-depletion layers, which leads to higher sensitivity for CO gas than that of bare ZnO [26]. Therefore, when Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs are exposed to CO gas, CO gas would be captured on the surface of both Cu and CuO, and then electrons could be transferred to the ZnO HNF. Electrons recombined with the hole in the CuO to form a thinner electron-depletion layer and cause resistance change [38]. On the other hand, it is notable that the response of the metal-semiconductor hybrid nanofiber, Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs, decreases dramatically over 300 °C, while that of ZnO hollow nanofiber starts to decrease over 400 °C, as previously observed, revealing that the optimal operating temperature of a Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs sensor for CO gas was lowered to 300 °C compared with the 400 °C of ZnO NF. The decrease of sensitivity was attributed to the decrease of electron mobility of the Cu metal and the desorption acceleration of CO molecules at higher temperatures. The specific surface area was measured and is listed in Table 3. Generally, a high specific surface area of sensing material has positive effects on the sensing response. The specific surface area of Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF was 24.1 m2g−1, which is 1.9 times higher than that of ZnO NF-500 (12.4 m2 g−1). The hollow structure of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF could also be responsible for the enhancement of gas-sensing performances. The hollow structure of the Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF provides a channel for the diffusion of gas molecules. Moreover, it provides more active sites and improves the kinetics of surface chemical reactions. Cu could contribute to the sensitivity and operating temperature of the CO gas sensor with a competition effect of intrinsic electrical conductivity and electrical mobility, depending on temperatures. Sensitivity could especially be improved by both the p–n junction and Cu with an efficient electron transfer between the components (CuO, ZnO HNF, and Cu) under 300 °C. However, with operating temperature raised higher, electron transfer could be hindered by electron scattering in Cu due to an increase of phonon concentration. In addition, desorption of CO gas on the surface of the sensor became frequent. Therefore, CO gas sensitivity was decreased above 300 °C. In conclusion, three factors, the p–n junction effect and the enhanced specific surface area due to the hollow structure, and electrical properties of the samples via Cu, would contribute to the improvement of CO sensitivity of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs at lower operating temperatures.

4. Conclusions

In summary, for a CO gas sensor in low operating temperatures, a novel Cu/CuO-photodeposited ZnO hollow nanofiber (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF) was prepared and characterized. Then, its gas-sensing performance and that of a nonphotodeposited ZnO hollow nanofiber toward CO gas was studied. For 100 ppm of CO gas, the Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF showed twice higher sensitivity than that of a pure ZnO NF at 300 °C. The enhancement of its sensing performance could be attributed to the hollow structure and the p–n junction. The introduction of a hollow structure improves the specific surface area and active sites. The introduction of Cu/CuO brought efficient electronic transfer. These two factors resulted in significant enhancement in sensitivity, even in low operating temperatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.H. and S.K.L.; data curation, Y.K.K. and S.H.H.; formal analysis, Y.K.K. and S.H.H.; methodology, Y.K.K.; project administration, S.K.L.; supervision, S.K.L.; writing—original draft, S.-H.H.; writing—review and editing, S.K.L.

Funding

This research was funded by DGIST R and D Program of the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea, grant number 19-NT-02.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, R.; Mittal, J.; Kushwaha, N.; Rao, B.V.; Pandey, S.; Liu, C.P. Room temperature carbon monoxide gas sensor using Cu doped OMS-2 nanofibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raub, J.A.; Mathieu-Nolf, M.; Hampson, N.B.; Thom, S.R. Carbon monoxide poisoning—A public health perspective. Toxicology 2000, 145, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, S.K.; Hong, S.H.; Hwang, S.H.; Choi, W.M.; Kim, S.; Park, H.; Jeong, M.G. Synthesis of Al-doped ZnO nanorods via microemulsion method and their application as a CO gas sensor. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lim, S.K.; Hwang, S.-H.; Chang, D.; Kim, S. Preparation of mesoporous In2O3 nanofibers by electrospinning and their application as a CO gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 149, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lim, S.K.; Hwang, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, H. Preparation of ZnO nanorods by microemulsion synthesis and their application as a CO gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Yin, C.; Yang, L.; Jiang, J.; Guo, Y. Optimizing the gas sensing characteristics of Co-doped SnO2 thin film based hydrogen sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 785, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haiduk, Y.S.; Khort, A.A.; Lapchuk, N.M.; Savitsky, A.A. Study of WO3–In2O3 nanocomposites for highly sensitive CO and NO2 gas sensors. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 273, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Basu, A.K.; Chauhan, P.S.; Awasthi, M.; Bhattacharya, S. α-Fe2O3 loaded rGO nanosheets based fast response/recovery CO gas sensor at room temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 465, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Han, C.; Li, X.; Shao, C.; Li, X.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Composition-controllable p-CuO/n-ZnO hollow nanofibers for high-performance H2S detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 285, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Datta, N.; Ramgir, N.; Kaur, M.; Kailasa Ganapathi, S.; Debnath, A.K.; Aswal, D.K.; Gupta, S.K. Selective H2S sensing characteristics of hydrothermally grown ZnO-nanowires network tailored by ultrathin CuO layers. Sens. Actuators B 2012, 166–167, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yoon, D.H.; Yu, J.H.; Choi, G.M. CO gas sensing properties of ZnO–CuO composite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1998, 46, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tuncel, D.; Ökte, A.N. ZnO@CuO derived from Cu-BTC for efficient UV-induced photocatalytic applications. Catal. Today 2019, 328, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Z.; Yang, T.; Dong, Y.; Wang, X. A room temperature VOCs gas sensor based on a layer by layer multi-walled carbon nanotubes/poly-ethylene glycol composite. Sensors 2018, 18, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nandy, T.; Coutu, R.A.; Ababei, C. Carbon monoxide sensing technologies for next-generation cyber-physical systems. Sensors 2018, 18, 3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rai, P.; Jeon, S.H.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, J.H.; Yu, Y.T. Functionalization of ZnO nanorods by CuO nanospikes for gas sensor applications. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 23604–23609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Youl Bae, H.; Man Choi, G. Electrical and reducing gas sensing properties of ZnO and ZnO–CuO thin films fabricated by spin coating method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1999, 55, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kayaci, F.; Vempati, S.; Ozgit-Akgun, C.; Donmez, I.; Biyikli, N.; Uyar, T. Transformation of polymer-ZnO core–shell nanofibers into ZnO hollow nanofibers: Intrinsic defect reorganization in ZnO and its influence on the photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 176, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, S.H.; Ankonina, G.; Youn, D.Y.; Oh, S.G.; Hong, J.M.; Rothschild, A.; Kim, I.D. Hollow ZnO nanofibers fabricated using electrospun polymer templates and their electronic transport properties. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 2623–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lallave, M.; Bedia, J.; Ruiz-Rosas, R.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T.; Otero, J.C.; Marquez, M.; Barrero, A.; Loscertales, I.G. Filled and hollow carbon nanofibers by coaxial electrospinning of alcell lignin without binder polymers. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 4292–4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, P.; Yao, M.; Ren, H.; Wang, N.; Komarneni, S. Nanocomposites of hierarchical ultrathin MnO2 nanosheets/hollow carbon nanofibers for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 463, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Wei, L.; Liu, Y.; Shao, C. ZnO hollow nanofibers: Fabrication from facile single capillary electrospinning and applications in gas sensors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 19397–19403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baquiran, T.L.; Garcia, M.C.T.; Herrera, M.U. Electrical characteristics of zinc oxide-copper oxide heterojunction at different illumination intensities. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 201, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, Y.K.; Kim, M.; Hwang, S.H.; Lim, S.K.; Park, H.; Kim, S. CdS-loaded flexible carbon nanofiber mats as a platform for solar hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hwang, S.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Yoon, S.H.; Lim, S.K.; Park, H. ZnO rods rooted on manifold carbon nanofiber paper as a scalable photocatalyst platform: The effects of ZnO morphology. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 85521–85528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, Y.K.; Seo, H.J.; Kim, S.; Hwang, S.H.; Park, H.; Lim, S.K. Effect of ZnO electrodeposited on carbon film and decorated with metal nanoparticles for solar hydrogen production. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ishikawa, T.; Yamaoka, H.; Harada, Y.; Fujii, T.; Nagasawa, T. A general process for in situ formation of functional surface layers on ceramics. Nature 2002, 416, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jeong, H.W.; Choi, S.Y.; Hong, S.H.; Lim, S.K.; Han, D.S.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; Park, H. Shape-dependent charge transfers in crystalline ZnO photocatalysts: Rods versus plates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21331–21338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dung Dang, T.M.; Tuyet Le, T.T.; Fribourg-Blanc, E.; Chien Dang, M. The influence of solvents and surfactants on the preparation of copper nanoparticles by a chemical reduction method. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 025004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Wen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cao, G.; Sun, Q.; Cao, J. CuO nanorods-decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocatalysts for catalytic oxidation of CO. Catalysts 2016, 6, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, Y.K.; Hwang, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, H.; Lim, S.K. ZnO nanostructure electrodeposited on flexible conductive fabric: A flexible photo-sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 240, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krishnakumar, T.; Jayaprakash, R.; Pinna, N.; Donato, N.; Bonavita, A.; Micali, G.; Neri, G. CO gas sensing of ZnO nanostructures synthesized by an assisted microwave wet chemical route. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 143, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, J.F.; Kuo, H.H.; Leu, I.C.; Hon, M.H. The effects of thickness and operation temperature on ZnO:Al thin film CO gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002, 84, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gong, H.; Hu, J.Q.; Wang, J.H.; Ong, C.H.; Zhu, F.R. Nano-crystalline Cu-doped ZnO thin film gas sensor for CO. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 115, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghosh, A.; Bhowmick, T.; Labhasetwar, N.; Majumder, S.B. Catalytic oxidation and selective sensing of carbon monoxide for sense and shoot device using ZnO–CuO hybrids. Materialia 2019, 5, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Jia, Q.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Ji, H. A CuO–ZnO nanostructured p–n junction sensor for enhanced N-butanol detection. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 2504–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Daemi, S.; Ghasemi, S.; Akbar Ashkarran, A. Electrospun CuO-ZnO nanohybrid: Tuning the nanostructure for improved amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide as a non-enzymatic sensor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 550, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, H.Y.; Lau, S.P.; Chen, L.; Lin, J.; Huan, C.H.A.; Tan, K.L.; Pan, J.S. Synergism between Cu and Zn sites in Cu/Zn catalysts for methanol synthesis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 152, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Poloju, M.; Jayababu, N.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. Improved gas sensing performance of Al doped ZnO/CuO nanocomposite based ammonia gas sensor. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 227, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 19 03151 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ZnO nanofibers prepared at different annealing temperatures for 4 h: (a) 400 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ZnO nanofibers prepared at different annealing temperatures for 4 h: (a) 400 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 600 °C; (d) 700 °C.
Sensors 19 03151 g001
Sensors 19 03151 g002 550
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of ZnO NF-500 sample at different annealing times: (a) 1 h; (b) 2 h; (c) 3 h; (d) 4 h.
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of ZnO NF-500 sample at different annealing times: (a) 1 h; (b) 2 h; (c) 3 h; (d) 4 h.
Sensors 19 03151 g002
Sensors 19 03151 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. Red circle, characteristic peaks of ZnO (JCPDS No. 36-1451); green hexagon and blue star, characteristic peaks of ZnAc (JCPDS No. 33-1464). (b) CO gas (100 ppm)-sensing responses depending on temperatures of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. (c) Photoluminescence spectra of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. (d) Repeatability test of the ZnO nanofibers as CO gas sensors.
Figure 3. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. Red circle, characteristic peaks of ZnO (JCPDS No. 36-1451); green hexagon and blue star, characteristic peaks of ZnAc (JCPDS No. 33-1464). (b) CO gas (100 ppm)-sensing responses depending on temperatures of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. (c) Photoluminescence spectra of as-prepared ZnO nanofibers with different annealing temperatures for 4 h. (d) Repeatability test of the ZnO nanofibers as CO gas sensors.
Sensors 19 03151 g003
Sensors 19 03151 g004 550
Figure 4. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping images (left) and SEM images (right) of Cu/CuO-photodeposited ZnO hollow nanofibers (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs) with different concentrations of CuAc2: (a) 0 mM; (b) 0.1 mM; (c) 0.5 mM; (d) 1 mM.
Figure 4. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping images (left) and SEM images (right) of Cu/CuO-photodeposited ZnO hollow nanofibers (Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs) with different concentrations of CuAc2: (a) 0 mM; (b) 0.1 mM; (c) 0.5 mM; (d) 1 mM.
Sensors 19 03151 g004
Sensors 19 03151 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) XRD spectra of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs with different concentrations of CuAc2; (b) enlarged XRD spectra in a 2-theta range of 40°–44°; (c) enlarged XRD spectra in the 2-theta range of 60°–64°; (d) enlarged XRD spectra in the 2-theta range of 71°–75°.
Figure 5. (a) XRD spectra of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs with different concentrations of CuAc2; (b) enlarged XRD spectra in a 2-theta range of 40°–44°; (c) enlarged XRD spectra in the 2-theta range of 60°–64°; (d) enlarged XRD spectra in the 2-theta range of 71°–75°.
Sensors 19 03151 g005
Sensors 19 03151 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) CO gas-sensing (100 ppm) responses depending on temperatures of as-prepared Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs; (b) repeatability test of Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF for CO gas in different working temperatures.
Figure 6. (a) CO gas-sensing (100 ppm) responses depending on temperatures of as-prepared Cu/CuO@ZnO HNFs; (b) repeatability test of Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF for CO gas in different working temperatures.
Sensors 19 03151 g006
Sensors 19 03151 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD patterns of as-prepared Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF and sample after annealing in air at different temperatures for 30 min. Red diamond, characteristic peak of CuO (022); blue circle, characteristic peak of Cu (111).
Figure 7. XRD patterns of as-prepared Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF and sample after annealing in air at different temperatures for 30 min. Red diamond, characteristic peak of CuO (022); blue circle, characteristic peak of Cu (111).
Sensors 19 03151 g007
Table
Table 1. Elemental composition of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF.
Table 1. Elemental composition of Cu/CuO@ZnO HNF.
SampleCu (%)Zn (%)Cu/Zn
ZnO NF-50001000
Cu/CuO(0.1 mM)@ZnO HNF8.9591.050.098 ± 0.007
Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF19.8580.150.248 ± 0.012
Cu/CuO(1 mM)@ZnO HNF29.3970.610.416 ± 0.005
Table
Table 2. Comparison of sensing characteristics toward CO of some ZnO-based sensors.
Table 2. Comparison of sensing characteristics toward CO of some ZnO-based sensors.
SampleCO (ppm)Temperature (°C)Response (%)Reference
ZnO20030090[31]
Al/ZnO20030050[32]
CuO/ZnO10030063[15]
Cu/ZnO10030069[33]
ZnO-CuO/Al2O320030013[16]
CuO/ZnO25017511[34]
Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF10030078This work
10020065
Table
Table 3. Electrical conductivity and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of the samples.
Table 3. Electrical conductivity and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of the samples.
SampleElectrical Conductivity (S m−1)BET Surface Area (m2 g−1)
ZnO NF-400 (no hollow)-7.8
ZnO NF-5006.261 × 10−612.4
Cu/CuO(0.5 mM)@ZnO HNF5.195 × 10−524.1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, S.-H.; Kim, Y.K.; Hong, S.H.; Lim, S.K. Cu/CuO@ZnO Hollow Nanofiber Gas Sensor: Effect of Hollow Nanofiber Structure and P–N Junction on Operating Temperature and Sensitivity. Sensors 2019, 19, 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143151

AMA Style

Hwang S-H, Kim YK, Hong SH, Lim SK. Cu/CuO@ZnO Hollow Nanofiber Gas Sensor: Effect of Hollow Nanofiber Structure and P–N Junction on Operating Temperature and Sensitivity. Sensors. 2019; 19(14):3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Sung-Ho, Young Kwang Kim, Seong Hui Hong, and Sang Kyoo Lim. 2019. "Cu/CuO@ZnO Hollow Nanofiber Gas Sensor: Effect of Hollow Nanofiber Structure and P–N Junction on Operating Temperature and Sensitivity" Sensors 19, no. 14: 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop