Next Article in Journal
Multi-Objectives Optimization of Ventilation Controllers for Passive Cooling in Residential Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
An Intelligent Monitoring Network for Detection of Cracks in Anvils of High-Press Apparatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Absolute Measurement of the Refractive Index of Water by a Mode-Locked Laser at 518 nm

1
School of Computer Software, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin 300112, China
3
School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(4), 1143; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041143
Submission received: 16 March 2018 / Revised: 5 April 2018 / Accepted: 5 April 2018 / Published: 9 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we demonstrate a method using a frequency comb, which can precisely measure the refractive index of water. We have developed a simple system, in which a Michelson interferometer is placed into a quartz-glass container with a low expansion coefficient, and for which compensation of the thermal expansion of the water container is not required. By scanning a mirror on a moving stage, a pair of cross-correlation patterns can be generated. We can obtain the length information via these cross-correlation patterns, with or without water in the container. The refractive index of water can be measured by the resulting lengths. Long-term experimental results show that our method can measure the refractive index of water with a high degree of accuracy—measurement uncertainty at 10−5 level has been achieved, compared with the values calculated by the empirical formula.

1. Introduction

During the past decades, marine technology has attracted great attention both as a field of research, and for economical reasons [1]. The resources hidden underwater, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are receiving increasing interest because of depleting resources on land. Scientists all over the world have developed a wealth of marine instruments, so as to make sailing, as well as resource exploration, convenient and efficient. The acoustic method is the most-widely used technique, owing to a lower attenuation when travelling underwater; however, due to the multipath effect, considerable noise could exist in the signal returns [2,3,4], resulting in a very complicated data process. In addition, the measurement resolution of the acoustic wave is strongly limited by beam size and divergence. The electro-magnetic wave (~GHz) can be exploited in short distance measurements underwater (tens of meters), based on phase measurement and power attenuation [5,6]. In the case of the phase measurement, accuracy and precision cannot be very high on account of the larger electro-magnetic wavelength. In terms of power attenuation, power-based measurements are negatively affected by extreme environments underwater. In short-path underwater measurements, optical waves, with a transmission window of between 480 nm and 540 nm, are an ideal candidate [7,8,9]. With excellent laser alignment and inherent high power, the underwater optical technique has shown itself to be highly effective in marine applications [10]. Different from acoustic and electro-magnetic waves, one basic issue associated with the optical method is the correction of the refractive index of water [11].
Measurement of the refractive index of water is of fundamental importance in the application of optical underwater techniques, and various methods have been proposed to address the issue. Analogous with measurements of the refractive index of air, indirectly, the refractive index of water can be corrected based on a knowledge of the wavelength, temperature, and density of the water, by using an empirical formula [12,13]. Directly, the refractive index of water can be measured using the methods of refraction and interferometrics. Classical schemes mostly rely on Snell’s law, e.g., Abbe refractometer [14], Pulfrich refractometer (based on the measurement of the deflection angle of the incident ray on a V-shaped prism [15]), and numerous other variants [16,17]. For these methods, knowledge of the refractive index of the prism is required, as well as the precise determination of the corresponding angles. In general, the measured angles can be determined by autocollimators; however, the resulting system is very complicated, and often involves moveable elements. Measurement uncertainty is at 10−4 level. In contrast to refraction methods, the interferometric technique, based on fringe counting, can provide better resolution and lower measurement uncertainty (better than 10−5). Traditionally, a water container (sample cell) is placed in the measurement path of the interferometer [18,19], a Michelson interferometer or Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The refractive index of water can be determined by measuring the optical path difference between the reference and measurement beam, with or without water in the container. Consequently, the geometrical length of the container is required. In this case, the thermal expansion of the water container can make considerably increase measurement uncertainty. To overcome this problem, scientists have proposed many solutions, e.g., the auto-compensating interferometer [20], and the multi-step interferometer [21], etc. B. Richerzhagen presented a configuration of a Michelson interferometer without compensation, where the measurement mirror is fixed in the water [22]. The measurement mirror should be well thermally isolated from the water container, and should be fixed on a moveable stage, to yield an absolute measurement of the refractive index. In addition, dispersive interferometry with a low coherence source [23], and the technique of fiber sensors [24] have also been reported.
Frequency combs have achieved huge success in many applications since their invention [25]. Benefitting from extremely high accuracy and precision of the frequency elements, frequency combs have advanced a wealth of fields, including precision spectroscopy [26], time/frequency transfer [27], and length metrology [28], etc. Length is a fundamental quantity in science and technology. During the past decade, frequency combs have revolutionized techniques of absolute distance measurement, as well as measurements of the quantity related to length, such as thickness [29], vibration/speed [30], surface profiling [31], and refractive index [32], etc. We focus on the measurement of refractive indices in this paper. To date, the measurement of the refractive index of air using a frequency comb has already achieved a 10−9 uncertainty [33], far surpassing those obtained using empirical formulas. Thickness and refractive index measurements of solids (glass, wafer) using frequency comb have also been in development for more than a decade [34,35,36], and various methods have been investigated in great depth. However, there are few reports about measurements of the refractive index of liquids using frequency comb.
In this study, we carried out absolute measurements of the refractive index of water using a frequency comb at 518 nm. We develop an interferometric system, where both the measurement and reference mirrors of the Michelson interferometer are under water in a quartz-glass container. Consequently, the expansion compensation of the water container is not required. Cross-correlation patterns can be obtained with a scanning stage, which can be processed to determine the corresponding lengths. The refractive index of water can be measured via the obtained lengths. Experimental results showed an agreement at 10−5 level, compared with the empirical formula [13].

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The frequency comb (Menlosystem FC1000 (Menlosystem, Martinsried, Germany), 100 MHz repetition frequency, 500 mW maximum output power, 518 nm center wavelength) emits a pulsed laser, which is split at a beam splitter. One part is directed into the Michelson interferometer, which can introduce a measured length L. Please note that the entire Michelson interferometer is placed in the water container, which means that the reference path and the measurement path are thermally expanded at the same time. In addition, the thermal expansion coefficient of quartz glass is relatively lower. Therefore, the system can automatically compensate for the thermal expansion of the water container. The other part is scanned by using a moving stage (PI M521, PI, Karlsruhe, Germany), 200 mm travel range), and is then combined with the output of the Michelson interferometer at a beam splitter. A photo-detector (PD1, Thorlabs APD430A, Thorlabs, NJ, USA) is used to detect the combined beam, and an oscilloscope (LeCroy 640Zi, LeCroy, NYC, USA) is used to measure and store the cross-correlation patterns. To obtain the precise position of the scanning mirror (MS), a fringe counting interferometer based on a cw laser (Thorlabs HRS015B, Thorlabs, NJ, USA), 632.991 nm, 2 MHz frequency stability) is used as the distance meter. The temperature and the density of water are measured by Valeport Mini SVP in real time, which can be used to calculate the refractive index of water with the empirical formula (i.e., Harvey formula) [13]. Please note that the Harvey formula is used in the case of pure water. In our experiments, we used the tap water, which is sufficiently clean for the Harvey formula to be applicable.
We measure the refractive index of water with two steps. First, the water container is not filled with water. We can obtain a length value La in air, and La = naL. na is the group refractive index of air, which can be corrected by using empirical formulae, and L is the geometrical length difference between the reference and measurement beams of the Michelson interferometer. Second, the water container is full with water. Considering the group refractive index of water, we can obtain a length value Lgw, i.e., ngwL, where ngw is the group refractive index of water. In the case of phase refractive index at a certain wavelength, the corresponding length value Lp can be expressed as npL, where np is the corresponding phase refractive index of water. Consequently, the group refractive index of water ngw can be calculated as:
n g w = L g w L = L g w L a / n a
For a certain wavelength, the phase refractive index of water can be indicated as:
n p = L p L = L p L a / n a
After we obtain the values of Lgw, Lp, La and na, the group and phase refractive indices of water can be measured.

3. Results

The source spectrum is shown in Figure 2, with a center wavelength of approximately 518 nm and a spectral width of around 4 nm. The environmental parameters are: 19.2 °C temperature, 1032.5 hPa pressure, and 35% humidity. The group refractive index of air na can be calculated as 1.00029157 by Ciddor formula [37].

3.1. Measurement of Group Refractive Index of Water

In this section, we describe the measurement of the group refractive index of water. The speed of the moving stage is set to 50 mm/s, i.e., travel time for a single stroke is 4 s. First, the water container is not filled with water. We can obtain a pair of cross-correlation patterns, shown in Figure 3a, which correspond to the reference and measurement mirrors respectively. Figure 3b shows a detailed observation of the cross-correlation pattern; in it, we see that the pulse width is about 100 μm (333 fs).
Performing a Hilbert transform of the cross-correlation patterns in Figure 3a, we can obtain the results shown in Figure 4, where the inset is the curve expansion. Based on the peak positions, the length La can be measured, using a fringe counting interferometer, at 70.783 mm. Therefore, length L can be calculated as 70.783 mm/1.00029157, i.e., 70.762 mm.
Second, the container is full with water. The obtained cross-correlation patterns are indicated in Figure 5a. Figure 5b is the expansion of a single cross-correlation pattern in the time axis. We find that, the cross-correlation pattern is obviously broadened to about 350 μm (1.2 ps). This broadening is due to water dispersion. The length Lgw can be measured by the same process as that of Figure 4, and is 96.676 mm. Based on Equation (1), the group refractive index of water can be thus calculated as: 96.676/70.762 = 1.36621. The water conditions were: 14.4 °C temperature and 999.2 kg/m3 density, and based on the empirical formula, the group refractive index of water can be calculated to be 1.36622. Finally, we find a difference of 1 × 10−5 between our result and that obtained using the empirical formula. Please note that the empirical formula in this work refers to Reference [13].
We performed a measurement over a 5-h period; the results are shown in Figure 6. In Figure 6a, the red solid line indicates the results obtained by our method, and the black dashed line represents results obtained using the empirical formula. Please note that, for convenience of display, both results are shifted by −1.36622. We observed that the group refractive index of water changed by up to around 3 × 10−4 in a 5-h period. Figure 6b shows the difference between the results obtained using the empirical formula and our method. In long-term experiments, we observed the difference to be be well below 2 × 10−5.

3.2. Measurement of Phase Refractive Index of Water

In this section, we measure the phase refractive index of water at a particular wavelength. Different from the Section 3.1, here we used a Fourier transform to determine the distance for each wavelength. In fact, as a classical method of data processing, Fourier transforms can also be used in Section 3.1. In that case, the length can be measured through the slope of the unwrapped phase, and the results are nearly the same.
Assuming that the phase of the wavelength λ is φ0 for the reference mirror, and φ1 for the measurement mirror, the length Lp can be calculated as (φ1φ0)/(2π) × λ for the wavelength λ [38,39]. Please note that φ1 and φ0 are the unwrapped phases. The data process of the Fourier transform is shown in Figure 7. The first cross-correlation pattern, (A) in Figure 5, is picked up, and zero padding is needed. To enhance process efficiency and save memory, we subsample the raw data, which is a mature technique widely used in the signal processing [40,41]; the resulting curve is shown in Figure 7a. Please note that the subsampling coefficient N0/N1 should be defined carefully; it must meet the condition that the frequency spectrum of the Fourier transform be completely located within a range from 0 to fs/2 (without spectrum leakage), analogous to the demonstration mentioned in Reference [42]. N0 is the sample number of the raw data (3 × 106 in our experiments), N1 is the sample number after subsampling (544 in our experiments), and fs is the sampling rate. Figure 7b shows the frequency spectrum, and we find that no spectrum leakage exists. Figure 7c,d shows the wrapped phase and unwrapped phase respectively. The data process of the second cross-correlation pattern (B in Figure 5) is the same as that shown in Figure 7. After the phases are obtained, Lp can be determined, and the phase refractive index can be measured based on Equation (2).
With water conditions of 14.4 °C and 999.2 kg/m3, the experimental results of phase refractive index measurements in the spectral range from 515 nm to 521 nm are shown in Figure 8. The pink dashed line indicates the results obtained using our method, and the green solid line shows the those from the empirical formula. In the range from 515 nm to 521 nm, the difference between our method and the empirical formula can be less than 1 × 10−5. We also find that water dispersion is very significant when green light transmits in water (~2.5 × 10−4 in the 6-nm spectral range), and that the pulse can be strongly broadened.
We carried out 5-h experiments; the experimental results for 518 nm wavelength (vacuum wavelength) are shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9a, the red solid line indicates the results obtained using our method, and the black dashed line represents those results obtained using the empirical formula. Please note that for convenience of display, both the results are shifted by −1.34272. We found that the results obtained using our method and those from the empirical formula changed under the same law, and the phase refractive index of water at 518 nm varied by up to about 2.5 × 10−4 in a 5-h period. Figure 9b shows the difference between the results obtained using the empirical formula and our method. In long-term experiments, we found measurement uncertainty to be well below 1.2 × 10−5.

4. Uncertainty evaluation

Based on Equation (1), the measurement uncertainty of ngw is related to Lgw, La and na, and can be calculated as:
u n g w 2 = ( L g w L a u n a ) 2 + ( n a L a u L g w ) 2 + ( n g w L a u L a ) 2
The first term of Equation (3) is related to the refractive index of air na based on the Ciddor formula. This part is related to the uncertainty of the Ciddor formula itself, the uncertainty of the sensor network, and the stability of the environment. Considering that the total optical path is relatively short, the inhomogeneity of the environment can be neglected. The average value of Lgw is 96.664 mm in 5-h experiments, and La equals to 70.783 mm. This part, dependent upon na, can thus be evaluated to 1.4 × 10−8, which is negligible. The second term of Equation (3) is related to the uncertainty of Lgw, which can be affected by the stability of the water and the algorithm of the data process. We fast performed five measurements; the stability of the measurement of Lgw is 1.3 μm (standard deviation). The second term can be calculated to 1.8 × 10−5. The third term of Equation (3) is related to the uncertainty of La, and the short-term stability of La is 0.6 μm (standard deviation). This part can be estimated to be 1.2 × 10−5. The expansion coefficient is 5 × 10−7/°C. The temperature change is about 3.5 °C (from 14.4 °C to 17.9 °C) in long-term experiments. Thermal expansion can be calculated at 0.1 μm, corresponding to 1.8 × 10−6 uncertainty. Finally, the combined uncertainty can be calculated to be 2.2 × 10−5, with a coverage factor of k=1, which shows a good agreement with the results in Figure 6b.
Based on Equation (2), the measurement uncertainty of np is related to Lp, La and na, and can be calculated as:
u n p 2 = ( L p L a u n a ) 2 + ( n a L a u L p ) 2 + ( n p L a u L a ) 2
As mentioned above, the first term of Equation (4) can be neglected. Considering the second term, the short-term stability of Lp is 0.45 μm, corresponding to 0.64 × 10−5 uncertainty of the refractive index. The third term of Equation (4) can be calculated to 1.1 × 10−5 uncertainty. The uncertainty due to thermal expansion is also 1.8 × 10−6. Therefore, combined uncertainty can be evaluated to be 1.3 × 10−5, with a coverage factor of k = 1, which shows a good agreement with the results in Figure 9b.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we present a method which enables the absolute measurement of the refractive index of water using a frequency comb. Based on changes of the optical path in air and water, the refractive index of water can be determined with high precision, which is of fundamental importance in the optical method when used underwater. Our results show a measurement uncertainty of 10−5, that is to say, the corresponding measurement uncertainty is only several mm when we measure a distance of up to 100 m underwater. This kind of performance can satisfy most applications. Thanks to the low power attenuation of blue-green light underwater, frequency-comb instruments show great promise for marine technology, significantly improving upon the current technologies. However, the entire system is relatively expensive on account of the cost of the frequency comb. The development of a portable and low-cost frequency comb would solve this problem [43,44].

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61505140).

Author Contributions

Zhaopeng Meng, Xiaoyu Zhai, and Hanzhong Wu proposed the method; Zhaopeng Meng, Xiaoyu Zhai, Zhiyang Wang and Hanzhong Wu designed and performed the experiments; Xiaoyu Zhai, Jianguo Wei and Zhiyang Wang analyzed the data; Zhaopeng Meng, Xiaoyu Zhai and Hanzhong Wu wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, J.; Kong, M.; Lin, A.; Song, Y.; Han, J.; Xu, Z.; Xu, B.; Gao, S.; Deng, N. Directly modulated green-light diode-pumped solid-state laser for underwater wireless optical communication. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 1664–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Amiri-Simkooei, A.; Snellen, M.; Simons, D. Principal component analysis of single-beam echo-sounder signal features for seafloor classification. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2011, 36, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Petillot, Y.; Tena Ruiz, I.; Lane, D. Underwater vehicle obstacle avoidance and path planning using a multi-beam forward looking sonar. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2001, 26, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hasan, R.; Ierodiaconou, D.; Monk, J. Evaluation of four supervised learning methods for benthic habitat mapping using backscatter from multi-beam sonar. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3427–3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, D.; Kwak, K.; Chung, W.; Kim, J. Development of underwater short-range sensor using electromagnetic wave attenuation. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2016, 41, 318–325. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Shamma, A.; Shaw, A.; Saman, S. Propagation of electromagnetic waves at MHz frequencies through seawater. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2004, 52, 2843–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, B.; Liu, T.; Hu, H.; Han, J.; Yu, M. Underwater image recovery considering polarization effects of objects. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 9826–9838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gu, Y.; Carrizo, C.; Gilerson, A.; Brady, P.; Cummings, M.; Twardowski, M.; Sullivan, J.; Ibrahim, A.; Kattawar, G. Polarimetric imaging and retrieval of target polarization characteristics in underwater environment. Opt. Express 2016, 55, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guo, Y.; Song, H.; Liu, H.; Wei, H.; Yang, P.; Zhan, S.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Liao, N.; Mu, Q.; et al. Model-based restoration of underwater spectral images captured with narrowband filters. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 13101–13120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bartolini, L.; Dominicis, L.; Collibus, M.; Fornetti, G.; Guarneri, M.; Paglia, E.; Poggi, C.; Ricci, R. Underwater three-dimensional imaging with an amplitude-modulated laser radar at a 405 nm wavelength. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 7130–7135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, S. Refractive index measurement and its applications. Phys. Scr. 2002, 65, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schiebener, P.; Straub, J. Refractive index of water and steam as function of wavelength, temperature and density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1990, 19, 677–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harvey, A.; Gallagher, J.; Sengers, J.L. Revised formulation for the refractive index of water and steam as a function of wavelength, temperature and density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1998, 27, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuhler, K.; Dereniak, E.; Buchanan, M. Measurement of the index of refraction of the plastic Phenoxy PKFE. Appl. Opt. 1991, 30, 1711–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moreels, E.; de Greef, C.; Finsy, R. Laser light refractometer. Appl. Opt. 1984, 23, 3010–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Santic, B.; Gracin, D.; Juraic, K. Measurement method for the refractive index of thick solid and liquid layers. Appl. Opt. 2009, 48, 4430–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nemoto, S. Measurement of the refractive index of liquid using laser beam displacement. Appl. Opt. 1992, 31, 6690–6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lu, W.; Worek, W. Two-wavelength interferometric technique for measuring the refractive index of salt-water solutions. Appl. Opt. 1993, 32, 3992–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dobbins, H.; Peck, E. Change of refractive index of water as a function of temperature. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1973, 63, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carroll, L.; Henry, M. Autocompensating interferometer for measuring the changes in refractive index of supercooled water as a function of temperature at 632.8 nm. Appl. Opt. 2002, 41, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. St-Arnaud, J.; Ge, J.; Orbriot, J.; Bose, T.; Marteau, P. An accurate method for refractive index measurements of liquids using two Michelson laser interferometers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1991, 62, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Richerzhagen, B. Interferometer for measuring the absolute refractive index of liquid water as a function of temperature at 1.064 μm. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 1650–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Harvey, A. Determination of the optical constants of thin films in the visible by static dispersive Fourier transform spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1998, 69, 3649–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, C.; Su, C. Measurement of the refractive index of liquids at 1.3 and 1.5 micron using a fiber optic Fresnel ratio meter. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 1683–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Newbury, N.R. Searching for applications with a fine-tooth comb. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 186–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nishiyama, A.; Yoshida, S.; Hariki, T.; Nakajima, Y.; Minoshima, K. Sensitivity improvement of dual-comb spectroscopy using mode-filtering technique. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 31730–31738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Deschenes, J.; Sinclair, L.; Giorgetta, F.; Swann, W.; Baumann, E.; Bergeron, H.; Cermak, M.; Coddington, I.; Newbury, N. Synchronization of distant optical clocks at the femtosecond level. Phys. Rev. X 2016, 6, 021016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balling, P.; Křen, P.; Mašika, P.; van den Berg, S.A. Femtosecond frequency comb based distance measurement in air. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 9300–9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jin, J.; Kim, J.W.; Kang, C.; Kim, J.; Eom, T.B. Thickness and refractive index measurement of a silicon wafer based on an optical comb. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 18339–18346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mahjoubfar, A.; Goda, K.; Ayazi, A.; Fard, A.; Kim, S.; Jalali, B. High-speed nanometer-resolved imaging vibrometer and velocimeter. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 101107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Moteki, D.; Shioda, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Kurokawa, T. Frequency-comb-based interferometer for profilometry and tomography. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 1976–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, J.; Lu, Z.H.; Wang, L.J. Precision measurement of the refractive index of air with frequency combs. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 3314–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Minoshima, K.; Arai, K.; Inaba, H. High-accuracy self-correction of refractive index of air using two-color interferometry of optical frequency combs. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 26095–26105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maeng, S.; Park, J.; Byungsun, O.; Jin, J. Uncertainty improvement of geometrical thickness and refractive index measurement of a silicon wafer using a femtosecond pulse laser. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 12184–12190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Eom, T.; Jin, J.; Kang, C. Vibration-insensitive measurement of thickness variation of glass panels using double-slit interferometry. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 6486–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Park, J.; Bae, J.; Jin, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. Vibration-insensitive measurements of the thickness profile of large glass panels. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 32941–32949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ciddor, P.E. Refractive index of air: New equations for the visible and near infrared. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 1566–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Van den Berg, S.A.; van Eldik, S.; Bhattacharya, N. Mode-resolved frequency comb interferometry for high-accuracy long distance measurement. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhu, Z.; Xu, G.; Ni, K.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, G. Synthetic-wavelength-based dual-comb interferometry for fast and precise absolute distance measurement. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 5747–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vaughan, R.; Scott, N.; White, D. The theory of bandpass sampling. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 1991, 39, 1973–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Groot, P.; Deck, L. Three-dimensional imaging by sub-Nyquist sampling of white-light interferograms. Opt. Lett. 1993, 18, 1462–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, G.; Zhou, Q.; Shen, L.; Ni, K.; Zeng, X.; Li, Y. Experimental optimization of the repetition rate difference in dual-comb ranging system. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 106602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, C.; Chu, S.; Little, B.E.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Leon-Saval, S. Portable frequency combs for optical frequency metrology. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 16671–16676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, H.; Zhao, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, K.; Xue, B.; Li, J.; He, M.; Qu, X. Long distance measurement up to 1.2 km by electro-optic dual-comb interferometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 251901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental setup. BS: beam splitter; MR: reference mirror; MM: measurement mirror; S: sensors; PD: photodetector; MS: scanning mirror; MRc: reference mirror of the cw interferometer; MSc: scanning mirror of the cw interferometer; cw: continuous wave laser.
Figure 1. Experimental setup. BS: beam splitter; MR: reference mirror; MM: measurement mirror; S: sensors; PD: photodetector; MS: scanning mirror; MRc: reference mirror of the cw interferometer; MSc: scanning mirror of the cw interferometer; cw: continuous wave laser.
Sensors 18 01143 g001
Figure 2. The source spectrum.
Figure 2. The source spectrum.
Sensors 18 01143 g002
Figure 3. (a) Cross-correlation patterns corresponding to the reference mirror and the measurement mirror, without water in the container; (b) detailed observation of the cross-correlation pattern, without water in the container.
Figure 3. (a) Cross-correlation patterns corresponding to the reference mirror and the measurement mirror, without water in the container; (b) detailed observation of the cross-correlation pattern, without water in the container.
Sensors 18 01143 g003
Figure 4. Results of Hilbert transform.
Figure 4. Results of Hilbert transform.
Sensors 18 01143 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cross-correlation patterns corresponding to the reference mirror and the measurement mirror, with water in the container; (b) detailed observation of the cross-correlation pattern, with water in the container.
Figure 5. (a) Cross-correlation patterns corresponding to the reference mirror and the measurement mirror, with water in the container; (b) detailed observation of the cross-correlation pattern, with water in the container.
Sensors 18 01143 g005
Figure 6. Long time measurements of the group refractive index of water. (a) Results obtained using the empirical formula and our measurements; red solid line: result of our method; black dashed line: result of the empirical formula; (b) difference between the results of empirical formula and our measurements.
Figure 6. Long time measurements of the group refractive index of water. (a) Results obtained using the empirical formula and our measurements; red solid line: result of our method; black dashed line: result of the empirical formula; (b) difference between the results of empirical formula and our measurements.
Sensors 18 01143 g006
Figure 7. Fourier transform data process. (a) Data after the sub sampling; (b) frequency spectrum of Fourier transform; (c) wrapped phase of Fourier transform; (d) unwrapped phase of Fourier transform.
Figure 7. Fourier transform data process. (a) Data after the sub sampling; (b) frequency spectrum of Fourier transform; (c) wrapped phase of Fourier transform; (d) unwrapped phase of Fourier transform.
Sensors 18 01143 g007aSensors 18 01143 g007b
Figure 8. Results of the phase refractive index measurement; pink dashed line: result of our method; green solid line: result of the empirical formula.
Figure 8. Results of the phase refractive index measurement; pink dashed line: result of our method; green solid line: result of the empirical formula.
Sensors 18 01143 g008
Figure 9. Time measurements of the phase refractive index of water at 518 nm. (a) Results of empirical formula and our measurements; red solid line: result of our method; black dashed line: result of the empirical formula; (b) difference between the results of empirical formula and our measurements.
Figure 9. Time measurements of the phase refractive index of water at 518 nm. (a) Results of empirical formula and our measurements; red solid line: result of our method; black dashed line: result of the empirical formula; (b) difference between the results of empirical formula and our measurements.
Sensors 18 01143 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, Z.; Zhai, X.; Wei, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, H. Absolute Measurement of the Refractive Index of Water by a Mode-Locked Laser at 518 nm. Sensors 2018, 18, 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041143

AMA Style

Meng Z, Zhai X, Wei J, Wang Z, Wu H. Absolute Measurement of the Refractive Index of Water by a Mode-Locked Laser at 518 nm. Sensors. 2018; 18(4):1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Zhaopeng, Xiaoyu Zhai, Jianguo Wei, Zhiyang Wang, and Hanzhong Wu. 2018. "Absolute Measurement of the Refractive Index of Water by a Mode-Locked Laser at 518 nm" Sensors 18, no. 4: 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop