Next Article in Journal
The Anti-Listeria Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolated from the Horticultural Environment in New Zealand
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Investigation of the Antibacterial Activity of Nine Commercial Water Disinfectants, Acidifiers, and Glyceride Blends against the Most Important Poultry Zoonotic Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Insect Pathogens: Implications for Plant Reproduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype I in UK Ruminants and Associated Zoonotic Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens12020348
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ticks and Rickettsiae Associated with Wild Animals Sold in Bush Meat Markets in Cameroon

by
Archile Paguem
1,2,
Kingsley Manchang
2,3,
Pierre Kamtsap
1,
Alfons Renz
1,
Sabine Schaper
4,
Gerhard Dobler
4,5,
Deon K. Bakkes
6 and
Lidia Chitimia-Dobler
4,*
1
Department of Comparative Zoology, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Buea, Buea P.O. Box 63, Cameroon
3
Bangangte Multipurpose Research Station, Bangangte P.O. Box 222, Cameroon
4
Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany
5
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Zoology, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
6
Gertrud Theiler Tick Museum, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria 0110, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(2), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020348
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 February 2023 / Published: 19 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zoonotic Disease Threats and Interventions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ticks are obligate blood-sucking parasites of wild animals and transmit many zoonotic microorganisms that can spread to domesticated animals and then to humans. In Cameroon, little is known about tick diversity among wildlife, especially for animals which are hunted for human consumption. Therefore, this survey was undertaken to investigate tick and Rickettsia species diversity parasitizing the wild animals sold in bush meat markets in Cameroon. In total, 686 ticks were collected and identified to the species level based on morphology, and some were genetically analyzed using the 16S rRNA gene. Eighteen tick species belonging to five genera were identified: Amblyomma spp. (Amblyomma compressum, Amblyomma flavomaculatum, and Amblyomma variegatum), Haemaphysalis spp. (Haemaphysalis camicasi, Haemaphysalis houyi, Haemaphysalis leachi, and Haemaphysalis parmata), Hyalomma spp. (Hyalomma nitidum, Hyalomma rufipes, and Hyalomma truncatum), Ixodes spp. (Ixodes rasus and Ixodes moreli), and Rhipicephalus spp. (Rhipicephalus guilhoni, Rhipicephalus moucheti, Rhipicephalus muhsamae, Rhipicephalus microplus, Rhipicephalus camicasi, and Rhipicephalus linnaei). In terms of Rickettsia important for public health, two Rickettsia spp., namely Rickettsia aeschlimannii and Rickettsia africae, were detected in Hyalomma spp. and Amblyomma spp., respectively. Distinct tick–pathogen patterns were present for divergent sequences of R. africae associated with exclusively A. variegatum vectors (type strain) versus vectors comprising A. compressum, A. flavomaculatum, and A. variegatum. This suggests possible effects of vector species population dynamics on pathogen population circulation dynamics. Furthermore, Candidatus Rickettsia africaustralis was detected for the first time in Cameroon in I. rasus. This study highlights the high diversity of ticks among wildlife sold in bush meat markets in Cameroon.

1. Introduction

Ticks are obligate blood-sucking arthropods which parasitize every class of terrestrial vertebrate, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and even amphibians [1]. Ticks are primarily parasites of wild animals, with only ~10% of species feeding on domestic animals [2,3]. During feeding on their hosts, they can cause various clinical manifestations including tissue injury, body paralysis, and anemia during massive infestations [4]. Many tick species are known reservoirs and vectors for a multitude of pathogens such as helminths, protozoa, bacteria, and viruses [3]. Wild animals play a significant role as reservoirs for many tick-borne infections, which can be easily spread to domestic animals and then to humans via tick infestations [5]. The emergence and resurgence of several tick-borne diseases continues to pose increasing public health concerns and economic impacts [6,7,8,9,10]. Although the vectorial significance of selected tick species infesting domesticated animals and humans is well-established, there are still many unknowns with respect to genetic diversity, species delimitation, and host distribution, particularly in wildlife [5,11].
In Cameroon, 53 ixodid tick species are known from domestic and wild fauna [12,13,14,15]. The majority of studies have focused on ticks of importance for domestic animals and livestock [16,17,18,19]. The most comprehensive study dates back to 1958 [14]. Nevertheless, information on tick species that infest wild animals in Cameroon remains scant. This lack of knowledge is compounded by the rapid decline and/or extinction of many wild species in the region, with associated losses among their highly specialized obligate hematophagous tick parasites [20,21]. Amblyomma rhinocerotis, a tick specialized to feed on rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), is already extinct in Cameroon due to growing anthropogenic impacts [22]. To conserve poorly known but highly threatened tick species, which may form the basis of future discoveries yet unknown, a greater understanding of their distribution, ecology, and biology is required [20].
Six ixodid genera, Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus, which contain 34 species between them, have been reported from wildlife fauna in Cameroon [14]. Previous studies were done exclusively based on morphology using museum or private collections [12,13,14,15]. However, morphology alone can prove insufficient to differentiate between closely related tick species, especially when the specimens are damaged, engorged, or at immature stages. Molecular data applied in a phylogenetic comparative framework using verifiable and taxonomically confirmed sequence data can serve to improve the taxonomic robustness of biodiversity surveys. The aim of this study was to identify ticks parasitizing wild animals sold in the bush meat markets in Cameroon using morphological and genetic methods and, in addition, the associated Rickettsia spp.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study areas were localized in three large agroecological zones of Cameroon: the Sudano-Sahelian zone (AEZ I), the High Guinea Savannah zone (AEZ II), and the Humid Forest zone with bimodal rainfall (AEZ V) (Figure 1). A strong climatic gradient runs from the humid forest in the south up to the dry Sudano-Sahelian in the far northern region. The rainy season in the Guinea Savannah zone is from April to October, whereas in the Sudano-Sahelian zone, it is from June to September. Annual rainfall ranges from 1400 to 1700 mm in the Guinea Savannah zone and from 800 to 1400 mm in the Sudano-Sahelian zone. The Humid Forest zone with bimodal rainfall lies at altitudes ranging between 400 and 1000 m above sea level. This zone is characterized by a humid forest and savannah mosaic. The average temperature in this zone is about 26 °C, and the annual average rainfall is 2456.8 mm.
These regions were selected because of the presence of hunting, butchering, and consumption of wild meat practices. These areas are also considered to be hot spots for zoonotic disease outbreaks [23]. More than 900,000 reptiles, birds, and mammals are sold each year by or to the rural and urban populations, corresponding to around 12,000 tons of terrestrial vertebrates [24]. Mammals represent the largest proportion of hunted animals, followed by reptiles, birds, and amphibians [24].

2.2. Tick Sampling

A cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2020 to November 2021 in five bush meat markets in five localities, Kaele (10°6′00″ N 14°27′00″ E), Soramboum (7°47′14″ N 15°0′22″ E), Lom Pangar (5°22′17″ N 13°30′45″ E), Mfou (3°57′36″ N 11°55′48″ E), and Ebolowa (2°55′ 012″ N11°09′00″ E), in the regions of far-northern, northern, eastern, central, and southern Cameroon, respectively (Figure 1).
Wild animals sold in the bush meat markets of the above-mentioned places were selected randomly and/or conveniently after explaining the aims of the study and upon agreement of the sellers. Most animals were dead and presented individually on a table or on the ground, together with other farming products. No financial incentive was given. Domestic animals are rarely seen in such places, except live chickens, which are kept apart from the bush meat. Examination of each animal was done at the market with as little disturbance as possible. Selected animals were thoroughly examined for attached ticks.

2.3. Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Tick

All ticks were identified to the species level using morphological characteristics described by [25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
Total DNA was extracted using the MagNA Pure LC RNA/DNA Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in a MagNA Pure LC instrument (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was extracted from individual ticks (if a single tick was found on a single host) or pools (2–10 ticks per pool, if ticks belonged to the same species and developmental stage and were collected from the same animal). The extracted total DNA was stored at −80 °C until PCR analysis. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols as described by Halos et al. [32].

2.4. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

All obtained 16S rRNA gene sequences for ticks from this study (GenBank accessions: ON318327-ON318387), as well as additional data from GenBank, were compiled into two datasets to represent Rhipicephalinae (Rhipicephalus and Hyalomma: 117 sequences) and non-Rhipicephalinae (Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, and Amblyomma: 97 sequences). Sequences from GenBank were chosen to encompass the range of Rhipicephalus, Hyalomma, Amblyomma, Haemaphysalis, and Ixodes species that occur in Afrotropical areas as well as closely related species to counterfactually confirm species identification based on morphology. The validity of species identification using sequences from GenBank follows from recent studies that include large-scale taxonomic investigations to verify species identity via phylogenetic analysis and correlated morphology [33,34,35,36,37]. The prevalence of misidentified tick species among sequence data in GenBank is a growing problem that can only be addressed by large-scale comparative taxonomic studies. Sequence data were aligned using MAFFT (Q-INS-i, 200PAM/k = 2; Gap opening penalty, 1.53) [38]. The optimal nucleotide substitution model was selected using BIC calculations in W-IQTREE [39] and was determined as TPM2+F+G4 (Rhipicephalinae) and K3Pu+F+I+G4 (non-Rhipicephalinae). Maximum likelihood analysis was performed in MEGA v7.0.14 [40] with 1000 bootstraps as well as with calculation of pairwise p-distances. Average p-distances between conspecific sequences from GenBank and collected samples were calculated to determine species identification validity according to the generally accepted threshold of 5% or greater sequence divergence between species [33,35,41,42,43].
Rickettsia spp. detection was done using real-time PCR to amplify a fragment of the gltA gene for screening. In this first step, 114 Rickettsia spp. positive pools were detected. All positive pools with CT below 35 were further investigated by amplifying the 23S-5S intergenic space gene using a conventional PCR. Sequence data for Rickettsia 23S-5S (ON333673-ON333740) obtained from this study were compiled with reference data from Genbank and aligned using MAFFT (Q-INS-i, 200PAM/k = 2; Gap opening penalty, 1.53) [38]. The optimal nucleotide substitution model was selected using BIC calculations in W-IQTREE [39] and was determined as HKY+F. Maximum likelihood analysis was performed in MEGA v7.0.14 [40] with 1000 bootstraps.

3. Results

3.1. Tick Collection and Identification

In total, 686 tick specimens, including 392 males, 179 females, 101 nymphs, and 14 larvae were collected from 166 out of 2000 wild animals examined. Infested wild animals belonged to thirteen species: Phataginus tricuspis (white-bellied pangolin, n = 48), Varanus niloticus (Nile monitor, n = 31), Atelerix albiventris (four-toed hedgehog, n = 25), Cephalophus rufilatus (red flanked duikers, n = 15), antelopes (n = 15), Lepus victoriae (African savanna hare, n = 9), Cercopithecus sp. (monkey, n = 7), Caracal aurata (African golden cat, n = 5), Mastomys natalensis (rodent, n = 4), Civettictis civetta (African civet, n = 3), Phacochoerus africanus (warthog, n = 2), Python sebae (African rock python, n = 1), and Atherurus africanus (African brush-tailed porcupine, n = 1). Based on morphological characteristics and 16S rDNA sequencing (Figure 2 and Figure 3), 18 different tick species belonging to Amblyomma, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus genera were identified.
Overall, A. compressum was the most frequently identified species (286/686, 41.7%), followed by A. variegatum (126/686, 18.36%), Ha. houyi (76/686, 11.07%), Ha. camicasi (58/686, 8.45%), A. flavomaculatum (39/686, 5.7%), and Rh. microplus (32/686, 4.7%). The remaining 12 species were found in proportions ranging from 0.1% to 1.6%. Amblyomma compressum was also the only species in which all life stages were collected. Adults and nymphs were collected for five out of the 18 species: A. flavomaculatum, A. variegatum, Hy. truncatum, Rh. moucheti, and I. rasus. Five collected species were represented by adults (males and females): Ha. camicasi, Ha. houyi, Ha. leachi, Hy. rufipes, and Rh. guilhoni; Ha. parmata, I. moreli, and Rh. microplus were represented by only females, and Rh. camicasi was represented by only one male. Hyalomma nitidum and Rh. linnaei were less often collected, having only one nymph for each species. Only the immature stages of Rh. muhsamae were collected. An overview of the tick species, life stages, associated hosts, and collection locality data is summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Tick Species and Hosts

Associations of tick species with different hosts are presented in Table 2. Of the 18 tick species infesting 13 species of wild animal, only two species, namely A. compressum and Ha. camicasi, were common on eight and seven different host species, respectively. Most A. compressum (251/286) and A. flavomaculatum (17/39) were found on pangolins, whereas A. variegatum (99/126) was found on Nile monitors. Rhipicephalus muhsamae (9/10) was associated with rats, with only one nymph found on Nile monitors. Ten out of eighteen species were recorded from Nile monitors, whereas only one species, A. compressum, was recorded from golden cats (n = 2). Four-toed hedgehogs were infested with eight different tick species. Five species (Hy. nitidum, Hy. rufipes, I. moreli, Rh. linnaei, and Rh. camicasi) were recorded from a single host species each (Table 2). Rhipicephalus microplus was recorded for the first time on four-toed hedgehogs (31/32) and Nile monitors (1/32).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Partial 16S rRNA Gene

Phylogenetic trees are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Amblyomma flavomaculatum, Ha. camicasi, Ha. houyi, I. moreli, and Rh. moucheti were sequenced for the first time. Additionally, one fully engorged Hyalomma female that was difficult to identify morphologically was confirmed phylogenetically as Hy. truncatum. Six I. rasus, three Rh. guilhoni, and one Rh. muhsamae collected from our study areas were sequenced and phylogenetically confirmed as well.

3.4. Tick Species Distribution in the Three Agroecological Zones

The relative abundance and distribution of each tick species for each agroecological zone is described in Table 3.
In the Sudano-Sahelian zone, eight tick species were recorded: A. flavomaculatum, A. variegatum, Ha. houyi, Hy. rufipes, Hy. truncatum, Rh. microplus, Rh. muhsamae, and Rh. linnaei. Rhipicephalus microplus is reported for the first time in this region and host. In the High Guinea Savannah zone, six tick species (Ha. camicasi, Ha. houyi, Hy. nitidum, Rh. moucheti, Rh. guilhoni, and Rh. camicasi) were collected from seven hosts. Haemaphysalis species were associated with seven hosts. Rh. moucheti is reported for the first time in this region. In the Humid Forest zone with bimodal rainfall, seven tick species were collected: A. compressum, A. flavomaculatum, Ha. camicasi, Ha. parmata, Ha. leachi, I. rasus, and I. moreli.
In three cases, tick species were found in two different agroecological zones. Amblyomma flavomaculatum was found in the Sudano-Sahelian and Humid Forest with bimodal rainfall zones, whereas Ha. camicasi was found in the High Guinea Savannah and Humid Forest with bimodal rainfall zones, and Ha. houyi was found in the Sudano-Sahelian and High Guinea Savannah zones.

3.5. Rickettsia spp. Detection

In total, 66 (57.9%) out of 114 positives from screening were sequenced.
Phylogenetic analysis showed three different Rickettsia species (Figure 4) circulating in ticks collected from wild animals, namely Rickettsia africae, Rickettsia aeschlimannii, and Candidatus Rickettsia africaustralis. Rickettsia africae (61, 92.4% of the 66 sequenced samples) was detected in all Amblyomma spp., with a high infestation rate in A. compressum (47/61, 77% of all Amblyomma spp.) but less in A. variegatum (10/61, 16.4%) and A. flavomaculatum (4/61, 6.55%). Moreover, distinct tick–pathogen patterns were present among divergent sequences of R. africae associated with exclusively A. variegatum (type strain) (within-clade sequence dissimilarity: ~0.008%) versus A. compressum, A. flavomaculatum, and A. variegatum (within-clade sequence dissimilarity: ~0%) (between-clade sequence dissimilarity: ~0.006% mean pairwise dissimilarity). Rickettsia aeschlimannii was detected in two Hy. rufipes and one Hy. truncatum. Candidatus Rickettsia africaustralis was detected for the first time in Cameroon in two I. rasus females, both of which were collected from pangolins.

4. Discussion

Limited studies focused on ticks parasitizing wild animals in Central Africa and their role as carriers of rickettsial bacteria. Traditional hunting and bush meat markets play a central role in contact between animals and humans and the spread of diseases from rural to urban populations. The selection of animals sold at such markets does not necessarily reflect natural abundances of the respective animal fauna. It is, however, useful for studying the human–vector–parasite interface and the diversity of tick, pathogen, and reservoir species involved. Due to the nature of bush markets, potential limitations include ticks leaving their hosts before examination or moving from one animal to another, though the prevalence of such events are generally rare and can be controlled for with large sample sizes. Additionally, vendors usually offer only one of any game species, further limiting the possibility of cross-contamination.

4.1. Tick Species and Hosts

In total, eighteen tick species belonging to Amblyomma, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus genera were collected from thirteen wild animal species.
Three Amblyomma species were recorded from wild animals, with A. compressum and A. flavomaculatum predominantly found on pangolins (noting the endangered status of pangolins and it being illegal to trade these animals in the markets in Cameroon since April, 2020), but also on Nile monitors and monkeys, whereas A. variegatum were found on Nile monitors and Four-toed hedgehogs in the Sudano-Sahelian zone. Amblyomma compressum is known as an exclusive ectoparasite of three African pangolin species [28]. However, in our study, A. compressum was collected from seven unexpected hosts, namely warthogs, Nile monitors, African brush-tailed porcupines, monkeys, African gold cats, African civets, and antelopes. Adults and immatures were collected from pangolins, whereas adults and nymphs were collected from African civets, monkeys, and warthogs, with only adults collected from the remaining hosts. This finding suggests that A. compressum is not very host-specific, and that cohabitation of pangolins with unexpected hosts can lead to infestations of the pangolin tick. Amblyomma flavomaculatum is known as a reptile tick, especially on Nile monitors and Savannah monitors (Varanus exanthematicus) [14,44], and it was previously reported from both hosts in Cameroon [14]. However, in the present study, A. flavomaculatum was collected from four hosts other than Nile monitors, namely, pangolins, four-toed hedgehogs, monkeys, and warthogs. It seems the pangolin is also an important host, as 17 specimens were collected from this host, while 16 specimens were collected from Nile monitors. Adults and two nymphs were collected from Nile monitors, while only adults were collected from unexpected hosts.
Conversely, A. variegatum is a generalist parasitizing a large spectrum of vertebrates including domestic animals, wild animals, and humans [14]. Seven Amblyomma species were reported from wildlife in Cameroon [14], namely A. cohaerens and A. splendidum from buffalo (Syncerus coffer), A. tholloni from African elephants (Loxodonta africana), A. paulopunctatum from domestic and wild suids (warthogs, pigs, etc.), A. nuttalli from tortoises, A. exornatum and A. flavomaculatum from Nile monitors (Varanus niloticus and V. exanthematicus), and A. latum as well as A. transversale from snakes (Naja melanoleuca, Python sebae, and Python regius).
In the genus Rhipicephalus, six species were recorded on Nile monitor, four-toed hedgehog, African savanna hare, red flanked duiker, monkey, and rodent hosts. Rhipicephalus microplus, Rh. muhsamae, and Rh. linnaei were exclusively found in Sudano-Sahelian areas, whereas Rh. guilhoni, Rh. moucheti, and Rh. camicasi were found in High Guinea Savannah areas. Rhipicephalus microplus is currently expanding its geographical and host range, having been previously reported on cattle in Humid Forest and High Guinea Savannah zones, but in our study, it was found in the Sudano-Sahelian dry savannah and steppes on Nile monitors and four-toed hedgehogs for the first time. This is important to note, as Rhipicephalus are involved in the transmission of viral, bacterial, and protozoan agents to domestic and wild animals as well as humans.
From the genus Hyalomma, three species were recorded: Hy. rufipes, Hy. truncatum, and Hy. nitidum. Adults of Hy. rufipes and Hy. truncatum were found on four-toed hedgehogs, whereas immatures of Hy. truncatum and Hy. nitidum were found on Nile monitors and red flanked duikers, respectively. The genus is well-represented in Cameroon by five species: Hy. impeltatum, Hy. impressum, Hy. rufipes, Hy. truncatum, and Hy. nitidum, which are parasites of ruminants, birds, small mammals, and often humans [14]. They are involved in the transmission of R. aeschlimannii and Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever to domestic and wild animals as well as humans.
The genus Haemaphysalis is represented in Cameroon by at least six species: Haemaphysalis aciculifer, Ha. hoodi, Ha. houyi, Ha. leachi, Ha. muhsamae, and Ha. parmata [14]. Most of them feed on primitive, medium-sized, and small-sized mammals as well as birds. In this study, four species, Ha. camicasi, Ha. houyi, Ha. leachi, and Ha. parmata, were recorded. The paraphyly between Ha. leachi lineages between Chad and Cameroon is puzzling, but it may indicate an unknown divergence (species or population) or misidentification associated with sequence data. The Ha. leachi complex remains a taxonomic challenge to date [45].
Ticks of the genus Ixodes with seven species are poorly studied in Cameroon. In this highly specialized group of ticks, many immature stages are not even known. Two species were reported: I. rasus and I. moreli.
From the 18 species identified in this study, nine species are known to parasitize humans: A. variegatum, Ha. leachi, Hy. rufipes, Hy. truncatum, I. rasus, Rh. microplus, Rh. guilhoni, Rh. muhsamae, and Rh. linnaei (previously known as Rh. sanguineus s.l.)

4.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Partial 16S rRNA Gene

Five tick species collected in the present study, A. flavomaculatum, Ha. camicasi, Ha. houyi, I. moreli, and Rh. moucheti, were sequenced for the first time. The phylogenetic analysis and sequences submitted to GenBank are relevant for future studies. Additionally, sequences confirmed morphological determinations for fully engorged specimens, larvae, and/or nymphs as well as for species collected from unexpected wild animal hosts like Rh. microplus and Rh. linneai. In total, 214 specimens were sequenced and included in the genetic analysis. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the presence of Rh. camicasi in Cameroon, in sympatry with Rh. guilhoni. Both species belong to the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group and have a similar morphology, but they have different geographic distributions [29].

4.3. Rickettsia spp. Detection

The genus Amblyomma is involved in the transmission of viral, bacterial, and protozoan agents to domestic and wild animals as well as humans. These include Ehrlichia ruminantium (the agent of heartwater), Theileria mutans, and Rickettsia africae (the agent of African tick-bite fever) [46]. There are many reports about A. variegatum carrying R. africae from different African countries such as Sudan [47,48] and Ethiopia [49]. In the present study, R. africae was detected in A. compressum, A. variegatum, and A. flavomaculatum and was sequenced from 61 tests (92.4% of the 66 sequenced samples). Phylogenetic analysis showed three clusters of R. africae detected in A. variegatum but only one cluster for A. compressum (primarily), A. variegatum, and A. flavomaculatum. The mean sequence divergence between A. variegatum-exclusive sequences and the wider vector associated clade (albeit primarily associated with A. compressum) was 0.006%. This may be related to the particulars of distinct tick species and their population dynamics, and it may not be directly linked with tick–host–pathogen biochemistry. More precisely, the high phylogenetic diversity of R. africae in A. variegatum may be due to the wide host range of A. variegatum that adds complexity and redundancy to the patterns of population dynamics among R. africae and A. variegatum populations. Furthermore, this suggests possible effects of vector species population dynamics on pathogen population circulation dynamics in the context of host population dynamics (a triple-layered system), which may drive evolutionary divergences in Rickettsia populations, strains, and species, or it may potentially cause differential pathogenicities to emerge over significant evolutionary time. Rickettsia aeschlimannii is associated with the Hyalomma species, especially with Hy. rufipes in Africa [47,48] as well as in European countries where Hy. rufipes is introduced by migratory birds as nymphs [50,51]. Rickettsia aeschlimannii was detected in two Hy. rufipes and one Hy. truncatum. The low number of R. aeschlimannii reported here is possibly due to the reduced number of Hyalomma species on wild animals.
Candidatus Rickettsia africaustralis was detected for the first time in Cameroon in two I. rasus females, both collected from pangolins. This Rickettsia species was detected for the first time in small mammal tissue from South Africa [52]. Ixodes rasus may prove to be a vector and reservoir for Candidatus R. africaustralis, as in other related Ixodes spp. Further investigations are necessary regarding the pathogenicity and vector competency for this new Rickettsia species.

5. Conclusions

The present study was carried out to determine the tick species that infest wild animals in Cameroon. As far as is known, this is the first tick survey of wild animals comprising tick species among five genera from well-defined hosts and agroecological zones. Ticks were identified morphologically and further confirmed or characterized genetically. In total, eighteen tick species belonging to Amblyomma, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus genera were collected from thirteen wild animal species. The most common bush meat species were the brush-tailed porcupine (Atherurus africanus), duiker (Cephalophus monticola), pangolin (Phataginus tricuspis), and Nile monitor (Varanus niloticus) [24]. Interactions between wild hosts, vectors, and pathogens are important to understand potential epidemiological risks and drivers.

Author Contributions

A.P., investigation, writing—original draft; K.M., P.K. and S.S., investigation; L.C.-D., conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, investigation; D.K.B., investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; L.C.-D., D.K.B., G.D. and A.R., conceptualization, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the National Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) in Cameroon, which is the country’s government institution for animal health and husbandry improvement. The ethical clearance number is CEI-UD/371/01/2016/M.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the sequences were deposited in GenBank, and the raw data are in the Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the technical staff (Chiakbang Gaston and Nfoujouem Fewou Felix) of the animal health section of the Institute of Agricultural Research for development and the Programme Onchocercoses (Univ. Tübingen) technical staff Jeremy Yembo and David Ekale for assisting in tick collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sonenshine, D.E.; Roe, R.M. Biology of Ticks, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 1, ISBN 978-0-19-974405-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lane, R.P.M.; Crosskey, R.W. Medical Insects and Arachnids; Chapman and Hill: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jongejan, F.; Uilenberg, G. The Global Importance of Ticks. Parasitology 2004, 129 (Suppl. 1), S3–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hurtado, O.J.B.; Giraldo-Ríos, C.; Hurtado, O.J.B.; Giraldo-Ríos, C. Economic and Health Impact of the Ticks in Production Animals; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78985-766-5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liyanaarachchi, D.R.; Rajakaruna, R.S.; Dikkumbura, A.W.; Rajapakse, R.P.V.J. Ticks Infesting Wild and Domestic Animals and Humans of Sri Lanka with New Host Records. Acta Trop. 2015, 142, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abanda, B.; Paguem, A.; Abdoulmoumini, M.; Kingsley, M.T.; Renz, A.; Eisenbarth, A. Molecular Identification and Prevalence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Zebu and Taurine Cattle in North Cameroon. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kuehn, B. Tick-borne Diseases Increasing. JAMA 2019, 321, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wesołowski, R.; Woźniak, A.; Mila-Kierzenkowska, C. The Importance of Tick-Borne Diseases in Public Health. Med. Biol. Sci. 2014, 28, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Balinandi, S.; Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Grandi, G.; Nakayiki, T.; Kabasa, W.; Bbira, J.; Lutwama, J.J.; Bakkes, D.K.; Malmberg, M.; Mugisha, L. Morphological and Molecular Identification of Ixodid Tick Species (Acari: Ixodidae) Infesting Cattle in Uganda. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 2411–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adams, D.A. Summary of Notifiable Infectious Diseases and Conditions—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 63, 1–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schulz, A.; Barry, Y.; Stoek, F.; Pickin, M.J.; Ba, A.; Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Haki, M.L.; Doumbia, B.A.; Eisenbarth, A.; Diambar, A.; et al. Detection of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Blood-Fed Hyalomma Ticks Collected from Mauritanian Livestock. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ragenau, J. Ixodidae of the Cameroon. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Fil. 1951, 44, 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ragenau, J. Note Complémentaire Sur Les Ixodidae Du Cameroun. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1953, 46, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar]
  14. Morel, P.C.; Mouchet, J. Les tiques du Cameroun (Ixodidae et Argasidae). Ann. Parasit. Hum. Comp. 1958, 33, 69–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Morel, P.C.; Mouchet, J. Les tiques du Cameroun (Ixodidae et Argasidae)—(2e note). Ann. Parasitol. 1965, 40, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bayemi, P.H. Dynamique saisonnière de l’infestation par les tiques (Ixodoidea) des bovins commercialisés dans la région de Yaoundé, Cameroun. Rev. Élev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop. 1991, 44, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Awa, D.N.; Adakal, H.; Luogbou, N.D.D.; Wachong, K.H.; Leinyuy, I.; Achukwi, M.D. Cattle Ticks in Cameroon: Is Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Absent in Cameroon and the Central African Region? Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2015, 6, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silatsa, B.A.; Simo, G.; Githaka, N.; Mwaura, S.; Kamga, R.M.; Oumarou, F.; Keambou, C.; Bishop, R.P.; Djikeng, A.; Kuiate, J.-R.; et al. A Comprehensive Survey of the Prevalence and Spatial Distribution of Ticks Infesting Cattle in Different Agro-Ecological Zones of Cameroon. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vanegas, A.; Keller, C.; Krüger, A.; Manchang, T.K.; Hagen, R.M.; Frickmann, H.; Veit, A.; Achukwi, M.D.; Krücken, J.; Poppert, S. Molecular Detection of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks from Cameroon. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mihalca, A.D.; Gherman, C.M.; Cozma, V. Coendangered Hard-Ticks: Threatened or Threatening? Parasites Vectors 2011, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rózsa, L.; Vas, Z. Co-Extinct and Critically Co-Endangered Species of Parasitic Lice, and Conservation-Induced Extinction: Should Lice Be Reintroduced to Their Hosts? Oryx 2015, 49, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schmeller, D.S.; Courchamp, F.; Killeen, G. Biodiversity Loss, Emerging Pathogens and Human Health Risks. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 3095–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saylors, K.E.; Mouiche, M.M.; Lucas, A.; McIver, D.J.; Matsida, A.; Clary, C.; Maptue, V.T.; Euren, J.D.; LeBreton, M.; Tamoufe, U. Market Characteristics and Zoonotic Disease Risk Perception in Cameroon Bushmeat Markets. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021, 268, 113358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fa, J.E.; Seymour, S.; Dupain, J.; Amin, R.; Albrechtsen, L.; Macdonald, D. Getting to Grips with the Magnitude of Exploitation: Bushmeat in the Cross–Sanaga Rivers Region, Nigeria and Cameroon. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 129, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hoogstraal, H.; States, U. African Ixodoidea: Ticks of the Sudan; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1956; pp. 1–1108. [Google Scholar]
  26. Matthysse, J.G.; Colbo, M.H. The Ticks of Uganda; Entomological Society of America: Annapolis, MD, USA, 1987; p. 426. [Google Scholar]
  27. Apanaskevich, D.A.; Schuster, A.L.; Horak, I.G. The Genus Hyalomma: VII. Redescription of All Parasitic Stages of H. (Euhyalomma) dromedarii and H. (E.) schulzei (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2008, 45, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Voltzit, O.V.; Keirans, J.E. A Review of African Amblyomma Species (Acari, Ixodida, Ixodidae). Acarina 2003, 11, 135–214. [Google Scholar]
  29. Walker, J.B.; Keirans, J.E.; Horak, I.G. The Genus Rhipicephalus (Acari, Ixodidae): A Guide to the Brown Ticks of the World; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; ISBN 978-0-521-01977-4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tomlinson, J.A.; Apanaskevich, D.A. Two New Species of Haemaphysalis Koch, 1844 (Acari: Ixodidae) in the H. (Rhipistoma) spinulosa Subgroup, Parasites of Carnivores and Hedgehogs in Africa. Syst. Parasitol. 2019, 96, 485–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arthur, D.R. Ticks of the Genus Ixodes in Africa; The Athlone Press: London, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  32. Halos, L.; Jamal, T.; Vial, L.; Maillard, R.; Suau, A.; Menach, A.L.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Vayssier-Taussat, M. Determination of an Efficient and Reliable Method for DNA Extraction from Ticks. Vet. Res. 2004, 35, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bakkes, D.K.; Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Matloa, D.; Oosthuysen, M.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Mans, B.J.; Matthee, C.A. Integrative Taxonomy and Species Delimitation of Rhipicephalus turanicus (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 577–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Black, W.C.; Piesman, J. Phylogeny of Hard- and Soft-Tick Taxa (Acari: Ixodida) Based on Mitochondrial 16S RDNA Sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10034–10038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Langguth, J.; Pfeffer, M.; Kattner, S.; Küpper, T.; Friese, D.; Dobler, G.; Guglielmone, A.A.; Nava, S. Genetic Analysis of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato Ticks Parasites of Dogs in Africa North of the Sahara Based on Mitochondrial DNA Sequences. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 239, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dantas-Torres, F.; Latrofa, M.S.; Annoscia, G.; Giannelli, A.; Parisi, A.; Otranto, D. Morphological and Genetic Diversity of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato from the New and Old Worlds. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nava, S.; Beati, L.; Venzal, J.M.; Labruna, M.B.; Szabó, M.P.J.; Petney, T.; Saracho-Bottero, M.N.; Tarragona, E.L.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Silva, M.M.S.; et al. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806): Neotype Designation, Morphological Re-Description of All Parasitic Stages and Molecular Characterization. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1573–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A Novel Method for Rapid Multiple Sequence Alignment Based on Fast Fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lado, P.; Nava, S.; Mendoza-Uribe, L.; Caceres, A.G.; Delgado-de la Mora, J.; Licona-Enriquez, J.D.; Delgado-de la Mora, D.; Labruna, M.B.; Durden, L.A.; Allerdice, M.E.J.; et al. The Amblyomma maculatum Koch, 1844 (Acari: Ixodidae) group of ticks: Phenotypic plasticity or incipient speciation? Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, L.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.-Z.; Li, X.-S.; Yin, S.-Q.; Zhu, D.; Xue, J.-B.; Li, S.-G. High Genetic Diversity in Hard Ticks from a China-Myanmar Border County. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mans, B.J.; Featherston, J.; Kvas, M.; Pillay, K.-A.; de Klerk, D.G.; Pienaar, R.; de Castro, M.H.; Schwan, T.G.; Lopez, J.E.; Teel, P.; et al. Argasid and Ixodid Systematics: Implications for Soft Tick Evolution and Systematics, with a New Argasid Species List. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 219–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaufman, T.S. A Revision of the Genus Aponomma Neumann, 1899 (Acarina; Ixodidae); University of Maryland: College Park, MD, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tomlinson, J.A.; Horak, I.G.; Apanaskevich, D.A. Identity of Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) muhsamae Santos Dias, 1954 (Acari: Ixodidae) and H. (R.) subterra Hoogstraal, El Kammah & Camicas, 1992, Parasites of Carnivores and Rodents in Eastern and Southern Africa. Syst. Parasitol. 2018, 95, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Walker, A. Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species; Bioscience Reports: Edinburgh, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Springer, A.; Shuaib, Y.A.; Isaa, M.H.; Ezz-Eldin, M.I.-E.; Osman, A.Y.; Yagoub, I.A.; Abdalla, M.A.; Bakiet, A.O.; Mohmed-Noor, S.E.-T.; Schaper, S.; et al. Tick Fauna and Associated Rickettsia, Theileria, and Babesia spp. in Domestic Animals in Sudan (North Kordofan and Kassala States). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shuaib, Y.A.; Elhag, A.M.-A.W.; Brima, Y.A.; Abdalla, M.A.; Bakiet, A.O.; Mohmed-Noor, S.E.-T.; Lemhöfer, G.; Bestehorn, M.; Poppert, S.; Schaper, S.; et al. Ixodid Tick Species and Two Tick-Borne Pathogens in Three Areas in the Sudan. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tufa, T.B.; Wölfel, S.; Zubriková, D.; Víchová, B.; Andersson, M.; Rieß, R.; Rutaihwa, L.; Fuchs, A.; Orth, H.M.; Häussinger, D.; et al. Tick Species from Cattle in the Adama Region of Ethiopia and Pathogens Detected. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 84, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rollins, R.E.; Schaper, S.; Kahlhofer, C.; Frangoulidis, D.; Strauß, A.F.T.; Cardinale, M.; Springer, A.; Strube, C.; Bakkes, D.K.; Becker, N.S.; et al. Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on birds migrating to the Island of Ponza, Italy, and the tick-borne pathogens they carry. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Schaper, S.; Rieß, R.; Bitterwolf, K.; Frangoulidis, D.; Bestehorn, M.; Springer, A.; Oehme, R.; Drehmann, M.; Lindau, A.; et al. Imported Hyalomma Ticks in Germany in 2018. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Essbauer, S.; Hofmann, M.; Kleinemeier, C.; Wölfel, S.; Matthee, S. Rickettsia Diversity in Southern Africa: A Small Mammal Perspective. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 12 00348 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of the study area. Geographic map showing five agroecological zones of Cameroon (based on information from the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, IRAD, 2009). The sampling areas (red circle) were located in the climate zones High Guinea Savannah, Sudano-Sahelian, and Humid Forest with bimodal rainfall.
Figure 1. Map of the study area. Geographic map showing five agroecological zones of Cameroon (based on information from the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, IRAD, 2009). The sampling areas (red circle) were located in the climate zones High Guinea Savannah, Sudano-Sahelian, and Humid Forest with bimodal rainfall.
Pathogens 12 00348 g001
Pathogens 12 00348 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 16S rDNA sequences for non-Rhipicephalinae ticks (Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, and Amblyomma) using a K3Pu+F+I+G4 nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineages collected as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 16S rDNA sequences for non-Rhipicephalinae ticks (Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, and Amblyomma) using a K3Pu+F+I+G4 nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineages collected as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Pathogens 12 00348 g002
Pathogens 12 00348 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 16S rDNA sequences for Rhipicephalinae ticks (Rhipicephalus and Hyalomma) using a TPM2+F+G4 nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineages collected as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 16S rDNA sequences for Rhipicephalinae ticks (Rhipicephalus and Hyalomma) using a TPM2+F+G4 nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineages collected as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Pathogens 12 00348 g003
Pathogens 12 00348 g004 550
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 23S-5S sequences for Rickettsia spp. using an HKY+F nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineage names as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 23S-5S sequences for Rickettsia spp. using an HKY+F nucleotide substitution model. Indicated are sample names and species/lineage names as well as Genbank accession numbers and bootstrap support values. Bolded samples refer to sequences generated in this study.
Pathogens 12 00348 g004
Table
Table 1. Tick species, life stages, associated hosts, collection locality, number, and frequency.
Table 1. Tick species, life stages, associated hosts, collection locality, number, and frequency.
Tick SpeciesTick StageHostLocationnFrequency (%)
MaleFemaleNymphLarva
Amblyomma compressum175465312White-bellied pangolins, Warthogs, Nile monitors, African brush-tailed porcupines, Monkeys, African golden cat, Antelopes, African civetsEbolowa, Mfou28641.8
Amblyomma flavomaculatum3252 Nile monitors, Four-toed hedgehogs, White-bellied pangolins, Monkey, WarthogKaele, Ebolowa395.7
Amblyomma variegatum90630 Nile monitor, Four-toed hedgehogKaele12618.4
Haemaphysalis camicasi2533 Red flanked duikers, Nile monitors, Monkeys, Hares, Four-toed hedgehog, African rock pythons, AntelopesEbolowa, Lom Pangar588.5
Haemaphysalis houyi4333 Nile monitors, Red flanked duikers, Monkeys, African savanna hares, Four-toed hedgehogs, Antelopes, African rock pythonKaele, Lom Pangar7610.9
Haemaphysalis parmata 2 Nile monitor, AntelopeEbolowa20.3
Haemapysalis leachi116 White-bellied pangolins, African civetsEbolowa172.5
Hyalomma nitidum 1 Red flanked duikerLom Pangar10.1
Hyalomma rufipes41 Four-toed hedgehogKaele50.7
Hyalomma truncatum114 Four-toed hedgehogs, Nile monitorKaele60.9
Ixodes moreli 1 AntelopeEbolowa10.1
Ixodes rasus181 White-bellied pangolins, Four-toed hedgehog, Warthog, MonkeyEbolowa101.5
Rhipicephalis microplus 32 Four-toed hedgehogs, Nile monitorKaele324.7
Rhipicephalus guilhoni22 African savanna hare, Four-toed hedgehog, Nile monitorLom Pangar40.6
Rhipicephalus moucheti731 Red flanked duikers, antelope, Monkeys, Four-toed hedgehogs, hares, Nile monitorLom Pangar111.6
Rhipicephalus linnaei 1 Nile monitorKaele10.1
Rhipicephalus camicasi1 Red flanked duikerLom Pangar10.1
Rhipicephalus muhsamae 82Rats, Nile monitorSoramboum, Kaele101.5
Total 686100
Table
Table 2. Tick species and the hosts from which they were collected.
Table 2. Tick species and the hosts from which they were collected.
Tick SpeciesHost
White-Bellied PangolinWarthogNile MonitorAfrican Brush-Tailed PorcupineMonkeyAfrican Golden CatAfrican CivetAntelopeFour-Toed HedgehogRed Flanked Duiker.African Rock PythonAfrican Savanna HaresRodentTotal
A. compressum25131652243 286
A. flavomaculatum17116 1 4 39
A. variegatum 99 27 126
Ha. camicasi 7 15 117927 58
Ha. houyi 2 15 181515110 76
Ha. parmata 1 1 2
Ha. leachi3 14 17
Hy. nitidum 1 1
Hy. rufipes 5 5
Hy. truncatum 2 4 6
I. moreli 1 1
I. rasus71 1 1 10
Rh. microplus 1 31 32
Rh. guilhoni 2 1 1 4
Rh. moucheti 1 3 122 2 11
Rh. linnaei 1 1
Rh. camicasi 1 1
Rh. muhsamae 1 910
Total27851495372183597283209686
Table
Table 3. Tick species and numbers specific to each agroecological zone.
Table 3. Tick species and numbers specific to each agroecological zone.
GenusTick SpeciesNo. of Ticks CollectedSudano-Sahelian ZoneHigh Guinea Savannah ZoneHumid Forest Zone with Bimodal Rainfall
AmblyommaA. compressum286 286
A. flavomaculatum3920 19
A. variegatum126126
HaemaphysalisHa. camicasi58 562
Ha. houyi761165
Ha. parmata2 2
Ha. leachi17 17
HyalommaHy. nitidum1 1
Hy. rufipes55
Hy. truncatum66
IxodesI. moreli1 1
I. rasus10 10
RhipicephalusRh. microplus3232
Rh. guilhoni4 4
Rh. moucheti11 11
Rh. linnaei11
Rh. camicasi1 1
Rh. muhsamae1010
Total 686211138337
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paguem, A.; Manchang, K.; Kamtsap, P.; Renz, A.; Schaper, S.; Dobler, G.; Bakkes, D.K.; Chitimia-Dobler, L. Ticks and Rickettsiae Associated with Wild Animals Sold in Bush Meat Markets in Cameroon. Pathogens 2023, 12, 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020348

AMA Style

Paguem A, Manchang K, Kamtsap P, Renz A, Schaper S, Dobler G, Bakkes DK, Chitimia-Dobler L. Ticks and Rickettsiae Associated with Wild Animals Sold in Bush Meat Markets in Cameroon. Pathogens. 2023; 12(2):348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paguem, Archile, Kingsley Manchang, Pierre Kamtsap, Alfons Renz, Sabine Schaper, Gerhard Dobler, Deon K. Bakkes, and Lidia Chitimia-Dobler. 2023. "Ticks and Rickettsiae Associated with Wild Animals Sold in Bush Meat Markets in Cameroon" Pathogens 12, no. 2: 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020348

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop